Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flood routing in an ephemeral channel with compound cross-section

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural phenomenon of surface and subsurface flow interaction is an intrinsic component of the hydrological processes in any watershed. It is a highly sensitive process, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, and should be considered while dealing with any water management activity in these regions. This paper describes a novel approach for flood routing in an ephemeral channel with compound cross-sections. The proposed mathematical model couples the numerical solution for complete Saint-Venant equations for surface flow with the numerical solution for one-dimensional Richards equation for sub-surface flow through an iterative procedure. Recently developed interactive divided channel (IDC) method is incorporated for simulating the main channel and flood plain flow interactions. In the one-dimensional surface and pseudo two-dimensional sub-surface (1DSP2DSS) model presented here, the effect of lateral variation in infiltration rate at a cross section arising due to (i) lateral variation in flow depth and (ii) lateral variation in soil characteristics is incorporated by considering infiltration into different soil columns for main channel and flood plains. The proposed model is verified by comparing the model results with those available in literature for benchmark problems. Simulations are presented to demonstrate the capability of the model for flood routing in ephemeral channels with flood plains and the effect of lateral variation in infiltration rate on transmission losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorman A U, Mohamed J A and Abdulrazzak M J 1993 Infiltration-recharge through wadi beds in arid regions. Hydrol. Sci. J. 38(3): 173–186. doi:10.1080/02626669309492661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulrazzak M J and Morel-Seytoux H J 1983 Recharge from an ephemeral stream following wetting front arrival to water table. Water Resour. Res. 19(1): 194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodrich D C 1997 Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semiarid watershed. Water Resour. Res. 33(12): 2951–2965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mansell M G and Hussey S W 2005 An investigation of flows and losses within the alluvial sands of ephemeral rivers in Zimbabwe. J. Hydrol. 314(1–4): 192–203. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shentsis I 2003 Increasing transmission losses from flood events due to groundwater extraction. Hydrol. Process. 17(4): 713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cataldo J C, Behr C, Montalto F A, Pierce R J, Eng E, Hall C and Street C 2010 Prediction of transmission losses in ephemeral streams, Western U. S. A. Open Hydrol. J. 4: 19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keppel R V and Renard K G 1962 Transmission losses in ephemeral stream beds. J. Hydraulic Division, ASCE 88 (3): 59–68

  8. Lane L J 1983 Transmission losses in: SCS National Engineering Handbook. US Government Print. Off., Washington, DC. 19-1–19-21

  9. Ponce V M, Pandey R P and Kumar S 1999 Groundwater recharge by channel infiltration in El Barbon basin, Baja California, Mexico. J. Hydrol. 214: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodrich D C, Williams D G and Unkrich C L 2004 Multiple approaches to estimate ephemeral channel recharge. American Geophysical Union, Washington. 77–99. (www.tucson.ars.ag.gov/icrw/Proceedings/Goodrich.pdf)

  11. Shentsis I and Rosenthal E 2003 Recharge of aquifers by flood events in an arid region. Hydrol. Process. 17(4): 695–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Hames A S and Richards K S 1998 An integrated, physically based model for arid region flash flood prediction capable of simulating dynamic transmission loss. Hydrol. Processes. 12(8): 1219–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutton C J, Brazier R E, Nicholas A P and Nearing M 2012 On the effects of improved cross-section representation in one-dimensional flow routing models applied to ephemeral rivers. Water Resour. Res. 48(4), n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2011WR011298

  14. Kollet S J and Maxwell R M 2006 Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv. Water Resour. 29: 945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mudd S M 2006 Investigation of the hydrodynamics of flash floods in ephemeral channels: Scaling analysis and simulation using a shock-capturing flow model incorporating the effects of transmission losses. J. Hydrol. 324: 65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahan O, Shani Y, Enzel Y, Yechieli Y and Yakirevich A 2007 Direct measurements of floodwater infiltration into shallow alluvial aquifers. J. Hydrol. 344(3–4): 157–170. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dunkerley D and Brown K 1999 Flow behaviour, suspended sediment transport and transmission losses in a small (sub-bank-full) flow event in an Australian desert stream. Hydrol. Process. 13(11): 1577–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morin E, Grodek T, Dahan O, Benito G, Kulls C, Jacoby Y, Langenhove G V, Seely M and Enzel Y 2009 Flood routing and alluvial aquifer recharge along the ephemeral arid Kuiseb River, Namibia. J. Hydrol. 368(1–4): 262–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma K D and Murthy J S R 1994 Estimating transmission losses in an arid region—A realistic approach. J. Arid Environ. 27(2): 107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coes A L and Pool D R 2005 Ephemeral-stream channel and basin-floor infiltration and recharge in the Sierra Vista subwatershed of the upper San Pedro basin, Southeastern Arizona, 85. Washington. Retrieved from http://www.usgs.gov/

  21. Parissopoulos G A and Wheater H S 1992 Effects of wadi flood hydrograph characteristics on infiltration. J. Hydrol. 126(3–4): 247–263

    Google Scholar 

  22. Philipp A, Schmitz G H and Liedl R 2010 Analytical model of surge flow in non-prismatic permeable channels and its application in arid regions. J. Hydraul. Eng. 136(5): 290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sorman A U, Abdulrazzak M J and Seytoux M H J 1997 Groundwater recharge estimation from ephemeral streams. case study: Wadi Tabalah, Saudi Arabia. Hydrol. Process. 11: 1607–1619. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/WR014i002p00281

  24. Camporese M, Paniconi C, Putti M and Orlandini S 2010 Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resour. Res. 46(2), n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2008WR007536

  25. Costa A C, Foerster S, Araújo J C de and Bronstert A 2013 Analysis of channel transmission losses in a dryland river reach in north-eastern Brazil using streamflow series, groundwater level series and multi-temporal satellite data. Hydrol. Process. 27(7): 1046–1060. doi:10.1002/hyp.9243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costelloe J F, Grayson R B, Argent R M and McMahon T A 2003 Modeling the flow regime of an arid zone floodplain river, Diamantina River, Australia. Environ. Modell. Software. 18(8–9): 693–703. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00071-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Desilets S L E 2007 Flood processes in semi-arid streams: Sediment transport, flood routing, and groundwater-surface water interactions. The University of Arizona

  28. Elfeki A M M, Ewea H A R, Bahrawi J A and Al-Amri N S 2015 Incorporating transmission losses in flash flood routing in ephemeral streams by using the three-parameter Muskingum method. Arab. J. Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1511-y

    Google Scholar 

  29. Klaus J, Külls C and Dahan O 2008 Evaluating the recharge mechanism of the Lower Kuiseb Dune area using mixing cell modeling and residence time data. J. Hydrol. 358(3–4): 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lange J 2005 Dynamics of transmission losses in a large arid stream channel. J. Hydrol. 306(1–4): 112–126. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Newman B D, Vivoni E R and Groffman A R 2006 Surface water–groundwater interactions in semiarid drainages of the American southwest. Hydrol. Process. 20(15): 3371–3394. doi:10.1002/hyp.6336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Osterkamp W R, Lane L J and Menges C M 1995 Techniques of ground-water recharge estimates in arid/semi-arid areas, with examples from Abu Dhabi. J. Arid Environ. 31: 349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Philipp A and Grundmann J 2013 Integrated modeling system for flash flood routing in ephemeral rivers under the influence of groundwater recharge dams. J. Hydraul. Eng. 139(12): 1234–1246. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saber M, Hamaguchi T and Kojiri T 2008 Surface runoff modeling of ephemeral streams considering homogenization theory in arid regions, Wadi Assiut in Egypt. Annu. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. (51B): 769–783. Japan: Kyoto University

  35. Sharma K D and Murthy J S R 1998 A practical approach to rainfall-runoff modelling in arid zone drainage basins. Hydrol. Sci. J. 43(3): 331–348. doi:10.1080/02626669809492130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Walters M O 1990 Transmission losses in arid region. J. Hydraul. Eng. 116(1): 129–138. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(129)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. He Z, Wu W and Wang S S Y 2008 Coupled finite-volume model for 2D surface and 3D subsurface flows. ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 13: 835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morita M and Yen B C 2002 Modeling of conjunctive two dimensional surface—three-dimensional subsurface flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 128(2): 184–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Erduran K S 2012 Integrated numerical model for vegetated surface and saturated subsurface flow interaction. Appl. Math. Mech. 33(7): 881–898. doi:10.1007/s10483-012-1592-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Ghobadian R and Fathi-Moghadam M 2014 Estimation of seepage losses in ephemeral network and branching streams. J. Hydrol. Eng. 19(2): 299–307. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cao Z, Meng J, Pender G and Wallis S 2006 Flow resistance and momentum flux in compound open channels. J. Hydraul. Eng. 132(12): 1272–1282. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vyverberg K 2010 A review of stream processes and forms in dry land watersheds. Report submitted to California Department of Fish and Game. 1–36

  43. Yen O C 2002 Open channel flow resistance. J. Hydraul. Eng. 128(1): 20–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bousmar D and Zech Y 1999 Momentum transfer for practical flow computation in compound channels. J. Hydraul. Eng. 125(7): 696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Costabile P and Macchione F 2012 Analysis of one-dimensional modelling for flood routing in compound channels. Water Resour. Manag. 26: 1065–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Helmio T 2002 Unsteady 1D flow model of compound channel with vegetated floodplains. J. Hydraul. 269: 89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huthoff F, Roos P C, Augustijn D C M and Hulscher S J M H 2009 Interacting divided channel method for compound channel flow. J. Hydraul. Eng. 134(8): 1158–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rashid R S M and Chaudhry H M 1995 Flood routing in channels with flood plains. J. Hydrol. 171(1–2): 75–91. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02693-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yoshida H and Dittrich A 2002 1D unsteady-state flow simulation of a section of the upper Rhine. J. Hydrol. 269: 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Freeze R A and Cherry J A 1979 Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  51. Van Genuchten M T 1980 A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivities of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nujic M 1995 Efficient implementation of non-oscillatory schemes for the computation of free-surface flows. J. Hydraul. Res. IAHR 33(1): 101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Singh V and Bhallamudi S M 1998 Conjunctive surface-subsurface modeling of overland flow. Adv. Water Resour. 21: 567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yee H C 1989 A class of high resolution explicit and implicit shock-capturing methods, NASA Technical Memorandum 101088, Ames Research Center, CA

    Google Scholar 

  55. Garcia-Navarro P, Hubbard M E and Priestley A 1995 Genuinely multidimensional upwinding for the 2D shallow water equations. J. Comput. Phys. 121(1): 79–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Chaudhry M H 2008 Open-channel flow. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2008. xvi, 523 p

  57. Hong L D, Akiyama and Ura M 1994 Efficient mass conservative numerical solution for the two-dimensional unsaturated flow equation. J. Hydrosci. Hydraul. Eng. 11(2): l–18

  58. Panday S and Huyakorn P S 2004 A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Adv. Water Resour. 27(4): 361–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lai C J, Liu C L and Lin Y Z 2000 Experiments on flood – wave propagation in compound channel. J. Hydraul. Eng. 126: 492–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sutfin N A, Shaw J R, Wohl E E and Cooper D J 2014 A geomorphic classification of ephemeral channels in a mountainous, arid region, South Western Arizona, USA. Geomorphology 221: 164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bull L J and Kirkby M J 2002 Dryland river characteristics and concepts. In: Bull L J and Kirkby M J (Eds.) Dryland rivers: Hydrology and geomorphology of semi-arid channels. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 3–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors thank Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India for providing facilities to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, India

    M Balamurugan & S Murty Bhallamudi

Authors
  1. M Balamurugan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Murty Bhallamudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Murty Bhallamudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balamurugan, M., Murty Bhallamudi, S. Flood routing in an ephemeral channel with compound cross-section. Sādhanā 41, 771–785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0511-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0511-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation