Skip to main content

Decentralized linear quadratic power system stabilizers for multi-machine power systems


Linear quadratic stabilizers are well-known for their superior control capabilities when compared to the conventional lead–lag power system stabilizers. However, they have not seen much of practical importance as the state variables are generally not measurable; especially the generator rotor angle measurement is not available in most of the power plants. Full state feedback controllers require feedback of other machine states in a multi-machine power system and necessitate block diagonal structure constraints for decentralized implementation. This paper investigates the design of Linear Quadratic Power System Stabilizers using a recently proposed modified Heffron–Phillip’s model. This model is derived by taking the secondary bus voltage of the step-up transformer as reference instead of the infinite bus. The state variables of this model can be obtained by local measurements. This model allows a coordinated linear quadratic control design in multi machine systems. The performance of the proposed controller has been evaluated on two widely used multi-machine power systems, 4 generator 10 bus and 10 generator 39 bus systems. It has been observed that the performance of the proposed controller is superior to that of the conventional Power System Stabilizers (PSS) over a wide range of operating and system conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9


  • Anderson J 1971 The control of a synchronous machine using optimal control theory. Proceedings of the IEEE 59: 25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjona M, Escarela-Perez R, Espinosa-Perez G, and Alvarez-Ramirez J 2009 Validity testing of third-order nonlinear models for synchronous generators. Electric Power Systems Research 79: 953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnautovic D and Medanic J 1987 Design of decentralized multivariable excitation controllers in multi machine power systems by projective controls. IEEE Trans. Energy Conv. EC-2(4): 598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S and Lim C 1982 Design of wide range power system stabilizers via pole-placement technique. Computers and Electrical Eng. 9(2): 103–110

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J and Sanchez-Gasca J 1989 Pole-placement designs of power system stabilizers. IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 4(1): 271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison E and Rau N 1971 The optimal output feedback control of a synchronous machine. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems 90: 2123–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demello F P and Concordia C 1969 Concepts of synchronous machine stability as affected by excitation control. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. PAS-88(4): 316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer R G and Agrawal B L 1983 State-of-the-art technique for power system stabilizer tuning. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. PAS-102(3): 699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurunath G 2010 Power system stabilizing controllers—Multi machine systems. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

  • Gurunath G and Sen I 2008 A modified Heffron–Phillip’s model for the design of power system stabilizers. In POWERCON 2008, New Delhi, India

  • Gurunath G and Sen I 2010 Power system stabilizers design for interconnected power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 5(2): 1042–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibullah B and Yu Y N 1974 Physically realizable wide power range optimal controllers for power systems. IEEE Trans. Power. Appar. Syst. PAS-93: 1498–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffron W G and Phillips R A 1952 Effect of a modern amplidyne voltage regulator on under excited operation of large turbine generators. Power Apparatus and Systems, Part III. Trans. Am. Inst. Electrical Eng. 71(1), Part III: 692–697

  • IEEE Std 421.5 I 2005 IEEE Recommended practice for excitation system models for power system stability studies

  • IEEE Task Force 1986 Current usage and suggested practices in power system stability simulations for synchronous machines. IEEE Trans. Energy Conv. EC-1(1): 77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundur P, Klein M, Rogers G and Zywno M 1989 Application of power system stabilizers for enhancement of overall system stability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 4(2): 614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam D M and Yee H 1998 A study of frequency responses of generator electrical torques for power system stabilizer design. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 13(3): 1136–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen E V and Swann D 1981 Applying power system stabilizers, parts I, II and III. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. PAS-100(6): 3017–3046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q, Sun Y and Mei S 2001 Nonlinear control systems and power system dynamics. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan M A, Parvatisam K and Bhuvanaika Rao S V M 1978 Design of supplementary stabilizing signals for synchronous machines by state feedback and eigenvalue placement. IEEE PES Winter Meeting

  • Moussa H and Yu Y 1972a Optimal stabilization of power systems over wide range operating conditions. IEEE Sumrmer Power Meeting C72

  • Moussa H and Yu Y 1972b Optimal power system stabilization through excitation and/or governor control. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems 91: 1166–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padiyar K R 1996 Power system dynamics stability and control. John Wiley; Interline Publishing

  • Padiyar K R, Prabhu S S, Pai M A and Gomathi K 1980 Design of stabilizers by pole assignment with output feedback. Int. J. Electrical Power and Energy Syst. 2(3): 140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagola F L, Pkrez-Arriaga I J and Verghese G C 1989 On sensitivities, residues and participations: Applications to oscillatory stability analysis and control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 4(1): 278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes Costa A, Freitas F D and e Silva A S 1997 Design of decentralized controllers for large power systems considering sparsity. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 12(1): 144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromotich F and Fleming R J 1972 Generator damping enhancement using suboptimal control methods. IEEE Summer Power Meeting C72: 472–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y-N 1983 Electric power system dynamics. London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Vongsuriya K and Wedman L 1970 Application of an optimal control theory to a power system. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems 89: 55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to A VENKATESWARA REDDY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

REDDY, A.V., KUMAR, M.V., SEN, I. et al. Decentralized linear quadratic power system stabilizers for multi-machine power systems. Sadhana 37, 521–537 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Power system stabilizer
  • linear quadratic regulator
  • small-signal stability
  • transient stability