Sadhana

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 303–317 | Cite as

Size effect in self consolidating concrete beams with and without notches

  • H. Eskandari
  • S. Muralidhara
  • B. K. Raghuprasad
  • B. V. Venkatarama Reddy
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to obtain the fracture characteristics of low and medium compressive strength self consolidating concrete (SCC) for notched and un-notched plain concrete beams by using work of fracture GF and size effect model Gf methods and comparing them with those of normal concrete and high performance concrete. The results show that; (i) with an increase in compressive strength, GF increases and Gf decreases; (ii) with an increase in depth of beam, the decrease in nominal stress of notched beam is more when compared with that of a notchless beam.

Keywords

Size effect model self consolidating concrete notched beam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albiero E 2001 SCC: Special concrete for the foundation pier of barletta mill. Production Technol. 22–25Google Scholar
  2. Amparano F E, Xi Y, Roh Y S 2000 Experimental study on the effect of aggregate content on fracture behaviour of concrete. Eng. Frac. Mech. 67(1): 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appa Rao G, Raghu Prasad B K 2002 Fracture energy and softening behaviour of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Res. 32(2): 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr B, Hasso E B D, Sabir B 1985 The effect of test specimen size on the fracture toughness of concrete. Cement and Concrete Res. 15(5): 833–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazant Z P, Giraudon E B 2002 Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard. Cement and Concrete Res. 32(4): 529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazant Z, Kazemi M 1990 Determination of fracture energy, process zone length and brittleness number from size effect, with application to rock and concrete. Int. J. Fract. 40(2): 111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazant Z, Pfeiffer P 1987 Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number. ACI Mater. J. 84(6): 453–480Google Scholar
  8. Belhamel F, Hisham K, Kharchi F 2002 Experimental method for the determination of the failure energy of ordinary concretes. Mater. Struct. 35(3): 182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharatkumar BH, Prasad BKR, MurthyDS R, Narayanan R, Gopalakrishnan S 2005 Effect of fly ash and slag on the fracture characteristics of high performance concrete. Mater. Struct. 38(1): 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharatkumar B 2003 Fracture characteristics and behaviour of high performance concrete (plain and reinforced). PhD thesis, IISc, India 235Google Scholar
  11. Biolzi L, Guerrini GL, Rosati G 1997 Overall structural behaviour of high strength concrete specimens. Constr. Build. Mater. 11(1): 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bury M A, Christensen B J 2002 The role of innovative chemical admixtures in producing self-consolidating concrete. Proc 1st Conf SCC, Rosemont, Illinois 137–141Google Scholar
  13. Druta C 2003, Tensile strength and bonding characteristics of self-compacting concrete. MSc thesis, Louisiana State Universityand 115Google Scholar
  14. Elices M, Guinea G, Planas J 1992 Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 3-influence of cutting the pδ tail. Mater. Struct. 25(4): 327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elices M, Guinea G, Planas J 1997 On the measurement of concrete fracture energy using three-point bend tests. Mater. Struct. 30(6): 375–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gettu R, Bažant Z P, Karr ME 1990 Fracture properties and brittliness of high-strength concrete. ACI, Mater. J. 87(6): 608–618Google Scholar
  17. Giaccio G, Rocco C, Zerbino R 1993 The fracture energy (g f) of high-strength concretes. Mater. Struct. 26(161): 381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guinea G, Planas J, Elices M 1992 Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part i-influence of experimental procedures. Mater. Struct. 25(4): 212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haidar K, Cabor G P 2002 Influence of porosity on fracture characteristics in mortar structures. Proc 15th ASCE Eng. Mech. New York 1–8Google Scholar
  20. Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Petersson P 1976 Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Res. 6(6): 773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karihaloo B 1995 Fracture mechanics and structural concrete. (UK: Longman Scientific and technical)Google Scholar
  22. Karihaloo B, Xiao Q 2002 Size effect in the strength of concrete structures. J. Ind. Nat. Acad. Sci. 27(4): 449–459Google Scholar
  23. Kim J K, Eo S H 1990 Size effect in concrete specimens with dissimilar initial cracks. Mag. Con. Res. 42(153): 233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kishi T, Hosoda A, Gurung C B, Kittiwuttichusinp S 2000 Effect of drying/autogenous shrinkage on ductility/fracture mode of beam and self-repairing function of expansive agent. Proc. JCI 22(3): 511–516Google Scholar
  25. Mata L A 2004 Implementation of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) pre-stressed concrete girders. M.Sc Thesis, North Carolina State University 119Google Scholar
  26. Mindess S 1984 The effect of specimen size on the fracture energy of concrete. Cement and Concrete Res. 14(3): 431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NT Build 491: 1999 Fracture energy (mode i)-three-point bend tests on notched beams. Nordtest Method 1–4. Available online, http://www.nordicinnovation.net/nordtestfiler/build491.pdf
  28. Perdikaris P C, Romeo A 1995 Size effect on fracture energy of concrete and stability issues in three-point bending fracture toughness testing. ACI, Mater. J. 92(5): 483–496Google Scholar
  29. Petersson P 1980a Fracture energy of concrete; method of determination. Cement and Concrete Res. 10(1): 78–89Google Scholar
  30. Petersson P 1980b Fracture energy of concrete: Practical performance and experimental results. Cement and Concrete Res. 10(1): 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raghu Prasad B K, Bharatkumar B H, Murthy D S R, Narayanan R, Gopalakrishnan S 2005 Fracture mechanics model for analysis of plain and reinforced high-performance concrete beams. ASCE, Eng. Mech. J. 131(8): 831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. RILEM FMC-50: 1985 Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams. Mater. Struct. 18(4): 287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. RILEM FMT 89: 1990 Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete. Mater. Struct. 23(6): 461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. RILEM TC89-FMT: 1991 Determination of fracture parameters (k IC and ctod c) of plain concrete using three-point bend tests. Mater. Struct. 23(6): 457–460Google Scholar
  35. Strange P C, Bryant A H 1979 The role of aggregate in the fracture of concrete. J. Mater. Sci. 14(8): 1863–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ta-Peng C, Mei-Miao S 1996 Fracture properties of lightweight concrete. Cement and Concrete Res. 26(2): 181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang T, Ouyang C, Shah S P 1996 Simple method for determining material fracture parameters from peak loads. ACI, Mater. J. 93(2): 147–157Google Scholar
  38. Wittmann F H 2002 Crack formation and fracture energy of normal and high strength concrete. J. Ind. Nat. Acad. Sci. 27(4): 413–423Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Eskandari
    • 1
  • S. Muralidhara
    • 2
    • 3
  • B. K. Raghuprasad
    • 3
  • B. V. Venkatarama Reddy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringSabzevar Tarbiat Moallem UniversitySabzevarIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringBMS College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations