Abstract
A fundamental component of safety assessment is the appropriate representation and incorporation of uncertainty. A procedure for handling hybrid uncertainties in stochastic mechanics problems is presented. The procedure can be used for determining the bounds on failure probability for cases where failure probability is a monotonic function of the fuzzy variables. The procedure is illustrated through an example problem of safety assessment of a nuclear power plant piping component against stress corrosion cracking, considering the stochastic evolution of stress corrosion cracks with time. It is found that the bounds obtained enclose the values of failure probability obtained from probabilistic analyses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth RA 1996 Failure assessment diagrams for use in R6 assessments for austenitic components. Int. J. Pres. Vessels Piping 65(3): 303–309
Anoop MB, Balaji Rao K, Gopalakrishnan S 2006 Conversion of probabilistic information into fuzzy sets for engineering decision analysis. Comp. and Struct. 84(3–4): 141–155
Anoop M B, Balaji Rao K, Lakshmanan N 2008 Safety assessment of austenitic steel nuclear power plant pipelines against stress corrosion cracking in the presence of hybrid uncertainties. Int. J. Pres. Vessels Piping. 85(4): 238–247
API 2000 API 579: Recommended practice for fitness-for-service. (Washington DC: American Petroleum Institute)
Chen S, Nikolaidis E, Cudney H H, Rosca R, Haftka R T 1999 Comparison of probabilistic and fuzzy set methods for designing under uncertainty. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. St. Louis
Dubois D, Prade H 1980 Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. (San Diego: Academic Press Inc.)
Dubois D, Prade H, Sandri S 1993 Onpossibility/probability transformations. In: R Lowen, M Roubens (Eds.) Fuzzy Logic. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers)
Dubois D, Prade H, Yager R 1999 Merging fuzzy information. In: JC Bezdek, D Dubois, H Prade (Eds.) Fuzzy sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers)
Ferrari P, Savoia M 1998 Fuzzy number theory to obtain conservative results with respect to probability. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 160: 205–222
Haldar A, Reddy R K 1992 A random-fuzzy analysis of existing structures. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 48(2):201–210
Harris D O, Dedhia D D, Lu S C 1992 Theoretical and User’s Manual for pc-PRAISE. NUREG/CR-5864
Helie M, Peyrat C, Raquet G, Santarini G, Sornay Ph 1996 Phenomenological modelling of stress corrosion cracking. Intercorr/96 First Global Internet Corrosion Conference. http://www.corrosionsource.com/events/intercorr/techsess/papers/session3/abstracts/helie.html
Helton J C, Oberkampf W L 2004 Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty. Reliab. Engng. Syst. Safety 85(1–3): 1–10
Lin C C 1996 Radiochemistry in nuclear power reactors. (Washington DC: National Academy Press)
Lu B T, Chen Z T, Luo J L, Patchett BM, Xu Z H 2005 Pitting and stress corrosion cracking behaviour in welded austenitic stainless steel. Electrochimica Acta 50(6): 1391–1403
Nikolaidis E, Haftka R T 2001 Theories of uncertainty for risk assessment when data is scarce. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Syst. 4(1): 49–56
Priya C, Balaji Rao K, Lakshmanan N, Gopika V, Kushwaha H S, Saraf R K 2005 Probabilistic failure analysis of austenitic nuclear pipelines against stress corrosion cracking. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 219(7): 607–626
Rahman S 1997 Probabilistic failure analysis of cracked pipes with circumferential flaws. Int. J. Pres. Vessels Piping 70(3): 223–236
Ross T J 1995 Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. (New York: McGraw-Hill Inc)
Savoia M 2002 Structural reliability analysis through fuzzy number approach, with application to stability. Comp. and Struct. 80(12): 1087–1102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anoop, M.B., Balaji Rao, K. Determination of bounds on failure probability in the presence of hybrid uncertainties. Sadhana 33, 753–765 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-008-0032-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-008-0032-3