Abstract
Educational psychologists have developed theories of learning based on three main paradigms – behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. Behaviourists believe that the behaviour of learners is a response to their past, and behavioural modification is the main purpose of education. According to cognitivists, the behaviour of learners is the result of his/her cognition, and the main aim of education is to change the cognitive schemas. Constructivists, on the other hand, believe that learners construct their own knowledge, and the objective of education is to provide opportunities to gain knowledge. The understanding of how children acquire knowledge has influenced teaching-learning processes in the classroom significantly. The role of teachers has changed from the person imparting information to a person facilitating the construction of knowledge. Teaching science has also been influenced by the changing psychological ideas about teaching and learning. The information age that dawned in the 20th century necessitated the acquisition of information through informal modes like listening to the radio, watching television or surfing the world wide web. Developments in digital technology have, thus, changed the way students make meaning of given information. All these changes have forced the educationists to design appropriate methods of teaching and learning. A journey into the changes that learning theories have witnessed influencing the teaching of school science is outlined in this article.
Similar content being viewed by others
Suggested Reading
S C Agarkar, Combating Learning Hurdles Arising Out of Social Deprivation In Yew Jin Lee (Ed.) Handbook of Science Education Research in Asia, Dordrecht: Springer Publishers, 2010.
David Layton, A Victorian Sharman of Science, New Scientists, Vol.75, No.1067, 1977.
Sarah Lock, Capacity for Change: A Review of the Nuffield Foundation Commonwealth Programme, London: Nuffield Foundation, 2010.
K Mukund, The Hoshangabad Science Teaching Project, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.23 No.42, 1988.
S C Agarkar, Inquisitiveness Among Underprivileged Students: Analysis and Implications, Journal of Education and Psychology, Vol.3, Nos.III & IV, 1998.
R F Gunstone, P Fensham and R T White, The Content of Science: A Construc-tivistic Approach to its Teaching and Learning, London: Falmer Press, 1994.
Phyllis C Blumenfeld, Elliott Soloway, Ronald Marks, Joseph Krajick, Mark Guzdial and A Palincsar, Motivating Project-based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning, Educational Psychologists, Vol.26, Nos.3 & 4, 1991.
Sadhana Saxena and Kamal Mahendroo, Constructivism and Science Education: Revisiting Hoshangabad Science Teaching Project, In Chitra Natarajan, Sugra Chunawala (Eds.) Proceedings of Episteme 2, Mumbai: HBCSE, TIFR, 2006.
Rosalind Driver, Ann Squires, Peter Rushworth and Valerie Wood-Robinson, Making Sense of Secondary Science Research into Children’s Ideas, London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2004.
Renders Duit and David Treagust, Conceptual Change — A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning, International Journal of Science Education, 25:6, pp.671–688, 2003.
Special Issue on Modelling Conceptual Change, Science and Education, Vol.23, No.7, Springer Netherlands, 2014.
Y C Cheng, K T Tsui, K W Chow and N M Mok, Subject Teaching and Teacher Education in the New Century: Research and Innovation, Hong Kong: HK Institute of Education, 2002.
Renders Duit and David Treagust David, Learning in science — From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond, In B J Fraser and K G Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
Peter Fensham, Defining and Identity: The Evolution of Science Education as a Field of Research, Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2004.
Michael Shayer and Philip Adey, Towards Science of Science Teaching: Cognitive Development and Curriculum Demands, London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1987.
Derek Hodson, Time for Action: Science Education for an Alternative Future, International Journal of Science Education, 25:6, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Sudhakar C Agarkar holds a PhD in Science Education and has had a long association with the Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education of TIFR. He works in the area of science and mathematics education, focusing on the education of socially deprived students. He has developed Remedial Instructional Strategy (RIS) to overcome learning hurdles faced by disadvantaged students and is involved in designing Open Educational Resources (OER) in school science and mathematics. Presently, he is occupied with the development of a Mobile App to make the learning of science entertaining, engaging and empowering.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarkar, S.C. Influence of Learning Theories on Science Education. Reson 24, 847–859 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-019-0848-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-019-0848-7