Skip to main content
Log in

Push-outs of derivations

  • Published:
Proceedings Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \( \mathfrak{A} \) be a Banach algebra and let X be a Banach \( \mathfrak{A} \)-bimodule. In studying \( \mathcal{H}^1 \)(\( \mathfrak{A} \),X) it is often useful to extend a given derivation D: \( \mathfrak{A} \)X to a Banach algebra \( \mathfrak{B} \) containing \( \mathfrak{A} \) as an ideal, thereby exploiting (or establishing) hereditary properties. This is usually done using (bounded/unbounded) approximate identities to obtain the extension as a limit of operators bD(ba) − b.D(a), a ε \( \mathfrak{A} \) in an appropriate operator topology, the main point in the proof being to show that the limit map is in fact a derivation. In this paper we make clear which part of this approach is analytic and which algebraic by presenting an algebraic scheme that gives derivations in all situations at the cost of enlarging the module. We use our construction to give improvements and shorter proofs of some results from the literature and to give a necessary and sufficient condition that biprojectivity and biflatness is inherited to ideals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blanco A, Weak amenability of \( \mathcal{A} \)(E) and the geometry of E, J. London Math. Soc. 66(2) (2002) 721–740

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnham J T, Closed ideals in subalgebras of Banach algebras I, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 32 (1972) 551–555

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghahramani F and Lau AT-M, Weak amenability of certain classes of Banach algebras without bounded approximate identities, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 133 (2002) 357–371

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghahramani F and Lau A T-M, Approximate weak amenability, derivations and Arens regularity of Segal algebras, Studia Math. 169(2) (2005) 189–205

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghahramani F and Loy R J Generalized notions of amenability, J. Funct. Anal. 208 (2004) 229–260

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Grønbæk N, Commutative Banach algebras, module derivations and semigroups, J. London Math. Soc. 40(2) (1989) 137–157

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Grønbæk N, Self-induced Banach algebras, Contemp. Math. 263 (2004) 129–143

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helemskĭ A Ya, Banach and Locally Convex Algebras (NewYork: Oxford University Press) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson B E, Cohomology in Banach algebras, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 127 (1972) 1–96

    Google Scholar 

  10. Selivanov Yu V Cohomological characterizations of biprojective and biflat Banach algebras, Mh. Math. 128 (1999) 35–60

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Grønbæk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grønbæk, N. Push-outs of derivations. Proc Math Sci 118, 235–243 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-008-0016-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-008-0016-6

Keywords

Navigation