Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical study on the impact of errors in a 325 MHz radiofrequency quadrupole and assessing the validity of quasistatic approximation in the analysis

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of a radiofrequency quadrupole (RFQ) is known to be sensitive to its geometric errors, as well as to the amplitude and phase errors of the input RF. Extensive statistical simulations are typically performed using the available computer codes, for assessing the effect of various errors, to fix the tolerances on these errors. Each of the statistical simulation requires beam dynamics calculations to be performed with a modified electromagnetic (EM) field configuration corresponding to the particular set of geometric errors. Although modified EM field due to geometrical errors should be accurately obtained using EM codes such as CST-MWS, such an approach is time-consuming. It is therefore common practice to obtain the EM fields, under quasistatic approximation, which is faster. Such an approach is routinely followed in codes such as TRACEWIN. In this paper, we first present extensive error studies, using this approach, for a 325 MHz, 3 MeV RFQ, which has been designed as a front-end accelerator for the envisaged Indian Facility for Spallation Research. The validity of quasistatic approximation for such error analysis is explicitly checked in this paper by comparing the results obtained using TRACEWIN, with those obtained using the EM fields derived from the CST-MWS code. To the best of our knowledge, such a comparison has not been reported before. Also, since the available computer codes do not give the option to study the effect of RF phase jitter in an RFQ, techniques evolved for this study are also described in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Sharma et al, RRCAT report RRCAT/2016-11 (2016), arXiv:1609.04518v2

  2. R Gaur and V Kumar, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4, 9 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018004

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G Bellodi et al, CERN-ATS-Note-2011-021 (2011)

  4. D Uriot, TraceWin, http://irfu.cea.fr/Sacm/logiciels/index3.php

  5. R Gaur and V Kumar, Error study of a 325 MHz, 3 MeV RFQ for ISNS, Proc. of the 8th DAE-BRNS Indian Part. Accel. Conf. (InPAC2018) (Indore, India, 2018) ID-245

  6. T P Wangler, RF linear accelerators, 2nd Edn (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. CST Studio Suite 2014, v2014.01. www.cst.com

  8. L Tchelidze and J Stovall, Beam loss limits in high power proton linear accelerators, Proc. of the 4th Int. Part. Accel. Conf. (IPAC2013) (Shanghai, China, 2014) THPWO075

  9. L Tchelidze and J Stovall, ESS AD Technical Note, ESS/AD/0039 (2012)

  10. W E Shoupp et al, Phys. Rev. 73, 421 (1948), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.421

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M Eshraqi et al, Statistical error studies in the ESS linac, Proc. of the 5th Int. Part. Accel. Conf. (IPAC2014) (Dresden, Germany, 2014) THPME044

  12. E Sargsyan, ESS RFQ error study, Technical Note, v1.3 (2013), https://docdb01.esss.lu.se/DocDB/0003/000308/002/ESS_RFQ_Error_Study_v1.3.pdf

  13. R Duperrier, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 3, 124201 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R Duperrier, Intense beam dynamics in RFQs, Thesis for Doctor of Science (The University of Paris, XI Orsay, 2000)

  15. K R Crandall et al, RFQ Design Codes, LA-UR-96-1836, LANL, USA (2005)

  16. Y K Batygin et al, Beam emittance growth effects in high-intensity RFQ, Proc. of 4th Int. Part. Accel. Conf. (IPAC2013) (Shanghai, China, 2013), TUPWA067

  17. MATLAB 2014a, v 8.3, https://in.mathworks.com

  18. R Gaur and V Kumar, Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. A 991, 165021 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.165021

  19. S V L S Rao and P Singh, PramanaJ. Phys. 74, 2 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S V L S Rao et al, Commissioning of the LEHIPA 3 MeV RFQ, Proc. of the 9th DAE-BRNS Indian Part. Accel. Conf. (InPAC2019) (New Delhi, India, 2019)

  21. General Particle Tracer, v 3.38. www.pulsar.nl/gpt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Gaur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaur, R., Kumar, V. Numerical study on the impact of errors in a 325 MHz radiofrequency quadrupole and assessing the validity of quasistatic approximation in the analysis. Pramana - J Phys 96, 126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02375-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02375-2

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation