Skip to main content
Log in

Quark star models with logarithmic anisotropy

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New models for the charged anisotropic stellar object were generated using the Einstein–Maxwell field equations. A new choice of pressure anisotropy in logarithmic form was used to generate a quark star model. Anisotropic and isotropic models were regained as a special case. We regained anisotropic models found by Maharaj, Sunzu and Ray; Abdalla, Sunzu and Mkenyeleye; and Sunzu and Danford. The isotropic models regained include the performance by Mak and Harko, and Maharaj and Komathiraj. Physical analysis showed that matter variables and the gravitational potentials are well behaved. Our model does satisfy the energy conditions and stability condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R Ruderman, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 427 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. K Schwarzschild, Skpa 424, 434 (1916)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J M Sunzu, S D Maharaj and S Ray, Astrophys. Space Sci. 352, 719 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P Mafa Takisa, S Ray and S D Maharaj, Astrophys. Space Sci. 350, 733 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. N Pant, N Pradhan and M H Marad, Astrophys. Space Sci. 355, 137 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P Bhar and M H Murad, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361, 334 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M H Murad and S Fatema, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 75, 533 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. N Naz and M F Shamir, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 35, 20550050 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M Sharif and N Farooq, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 61 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M F Shamir and G Mustafa, Int. J. Mod Phys. 35, 20550083 (2020)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. B V Ivanov, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 227 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. B S Ratarpal, D M Pandya and R Sharma, Astrophys. Space Sci. 362, 82 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S Gedela, N Pant and M Govender, Braz. J. Phys. (2021)

  14. S Thirukkanesh and S D Maharaj, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 235001 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F Rahaman, R Sharma, S Ray, R Maulick and I Karar, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2071 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S D Maharaj and P Mafa Takisa, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 1419 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. P Mafa Takisa and S D Maharaj, Astrophys. Space Sci. 343, 569 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P Mafa Takisa and S D Maharaj, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 45, 1951 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R Sharma, S Karmakar and S Mukherjee, Int. J. Mod Phys. D 15, 405 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M Gleiser and K Dev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1389 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K Dev and M Gleiser, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 1793 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S A Ngubelanga, S D Maharaj and S Moopanar, Astrophys. Space Sci. 357, 40 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J M Sunzu and P Danford, Pramana – J. Phys. 89, 44 (2017), DOI 10.1007/s12043-017-1442-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J M Sunzu and M Thomas, Pramana – J. Phys. 91, 1 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A T Abdalla, J M Sunzu and J M Mkenyeleye, Pramana – J. Phys. 95, 86 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. K Komathiraj and S D Maharaj, Int. Mod. Phys. D 16, 1803 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. S K Ngubelanga and S D Maharaj, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K D Matondo and S D Maharaj, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361, 221 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M Esculpi and E Aloma, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 521 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S K Maurya, Y K Gupta and S Ray, Eur. Phys. Scr. C. 77, 360 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. R Sharma and S D Maharaj, Mon. Not. R. Astro. Soc. 375, 1265 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. T Feroze and A A Siddiqui, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1025 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. S Thirukkanesh and F S Ragel, Pramana – J. Phys. 78, 687 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. M Sharif and A Siddiqa, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 529 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. F Rahaman, S Ray, A K Jafry and K Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104055 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. P Bhar, Astrophys. Space Sci. 359, 41 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. P Bhar, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 757 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. P Bhar, M Govender and R Sharma, Pramana - J. Phys. 90, 5 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. P Bhar, F Rahaman, A Jawad and S Islam, Astrophys. Space Sci. 360, 32 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. J M Sunzu, A K Mathias and S D Maharaj, J. Astrophys. Astron. 40 8 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. S D Maharaj, J M Sunzu and S Ray, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129 3 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M C Durgapal and R Bannerji, Phys. Rev. D 27, 328 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. J M Sunzu, S D Maharaj and S Ray, Astrophys. Space Sci. 354, 2131 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the University of Dodoma for the conducive and supportive environment to conduct research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jefta M Sunzu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juma, M., Mkenyeleye, J.M. & Sunzu, J.M. Quark star models with logarithmic anisotropy. Pramana - J Phys 96, 88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02338-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02338-7

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation