Abstract
The pursuit of superior working liquids for heat / mass transfer mechanisms in engineering is on the rise, not only to maximise revenue but also to accommodate heat dissipation or chemical separation under extreme conditions. The addition of a small amount of nanoparticle, i.e. a product called nanofluid, has been initiated over the last decade. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of unsteady three-dimensional (3D) flow of the Eyring–Powell nanofluid under convective and nanoparticles mass flux conditions. The effects of constructive / destructive chemical reactions and nonlinear thermal radiation are also considered in the Eyring–Powell nanofluid model. Additionally, suitable transformations are utilised to obtain coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) from the system of partial differential equations (PDEs) and the numerical solution of the system of the coupled ODEs is obtained by means of the bvp4c scheme. The obtained numerical data are plotted for the temperature and concentration profiles of nanofluids for various and converging values of physical parameters. Our findings demonstrate that the temperature of the Eyring–Powell nanofluid fall-off by changing the heat sink parameter. Furthermore, it is perceived from the sketches that the concentration of Eyring–Powell magneto-nanofluid decays at higher values of chemical reaction parameter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S U S Choi, ASME Int. Mech. Eng. 66, 99 (1995)
H F Oztop and E Abu-Nada, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 1326 (2008)
O D Makinde and A Aziz, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 50, 1326 (2011)
D Pal and H Mondal, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16, 1942 (2011)
D Pal and H Mondal, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 38, 463 (2011)
M Turkyilmazoglu, Chem. Eng. Sci. 84, 182 (2012)
W A Khan, M Khan and R Malik, PLoS ONE 9(8), e10510 (2014)
M Khan, R Malik, A Munir and W A Khan, PLoS ONE 10(5), e0125683 (2015)
A V Kuznetsou and D A Nield, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 77, 126 (2014)
T Hayat, M Waqas, S A Shehzad and A Alsaedi, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26, 214 (2014)
T Hayat, M Imtiaz and A Alsaedi, J. Mol. Liq. 212, 203 (2015)
T Hayat, M Imtiaz and A Alsaedi, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 395, 294 (2015)
M Khan and W A Khan, AIP Adv. 5, 107138 (2015)
M Khan and W A Khan, AIP Adv. 6, 025211 (2016)
N C Peddisetty, Pramana – J. Phys. 87, 62 (2016)
M Khan and W A Khan, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 2359 (2016)
N A Sheikh, F Ali, I Khan, M Gohar and M Saqib, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 540 (2017)
M Khan, M Iran and W A Khan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 22054 (2017)
G Pizza, J Mantzaras and C E Frouzakis, Catal. Today 155, 123 (2010)
T Hayat, M Waqas, M I Khan and A Alsaedi, J. Mol. Liq. 225, 302 (2017)
T Hayat, M I Khan, M Waqas and A Alsaedi, Colloids Surf. A 518, 263 (2017)
M I Khan, T Hayat, M Waqas and A Alsaedi, J. Mol. Liq. 230, 143 (2017)
Y Wang, Z Zhou and W Yang, Energy Convers. Manage. 51(6), 1127 (2010)
Y H Li, G B Chen and F H Wu, Combust. Flame 159(4), 1644 (2012)
T Yasmeen, T Hayat, M I Khan, M Imtiaz and A Alsaedi, J. Mol. Liq. 223, 1000 (2016)
W A Khan, A S Alshomrani and M Khan, Results Phys. 6, 772 (2016)
A Khalid, I Khan, A Khan and S Shafie, AIP Adv. 5, 127125 (2015)
W A Khan and M Khan, Results Phys. 6, 829 (2016)
T Hayat, M Waqas, S A Shehzad and A Alsaedi, Pramana – J. Phys. 86, 3 (2016)
N A Sheikh, F Ali, M Saqib, I Khan, S A A Jan, A S Alshomrani and M S Alghamdi, Results Phys. 7, 789 (2017)
M Khan, W A Khan and A S Alshomrani, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 101, 570 (2016)
F Ali, N A Sheikh, I Khan and M Saqib, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 423, 327 (2017)
M Irfan, W A Khan and M Khan, Results Phys. 7, 3315 (2017)
M Irfan, M Khan and W A Khan, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 517 (2017)
F Ali, M Saqib, I Khan, N A Sheikh and S A A Jan, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 95 (2017)
F Ali, N A Sheikh, I Khan and M Saqib, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42, 2565 (2017)
L Ahmed, M Khan and W A Khan, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 373 (2017)
A Khan, I Khan, A Khalid and S Shafie, Results Phys. 7, 3301 (2017)
T Hayat, Z Abbas, M Qasim and S Obaidat, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 8, 1817 (2012)
B J Gireesha, R S R Gorla and B Mahanthesh, J. Nanofluids 4, 474 (2015)
M Khan, M Irfan, W A Khan and L Ahmad, Results Phys. 7, 1899 (2017)
M Khan, M Irfan and W A Khan, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 130, 375 (2017)
F Ali, N A Sheikh, M Saqib and A Khan, Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A 8(1), 101 (2017)
M M Bhatti, A Zeeshan and R Ellahi, Pramana – J. Phys. 89: 48 (2017)
M Khan, L Ahmad and W A Khan, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 4475 (2017)
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No. RG-8-130-38. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks the DSR technical and financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, W.A., Alshomrani, A.S., Alzahrani, A.K. et al. Impact of autocatalysis chemical reaction on nonlinear radiative heat transfer of unsteady three-dimensional Eyring–Powell magneto-nanofluid flow. Pramana - J Phys 91, 63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1634-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1634-x
Keywords
- Unsteady 3D flow
- Eyring–Powell model
- nanoparticles
- nonlinear thermal radiation
- new mass flux boundary conditions