Skip to main content
Log in

An alternative method for the measurement of neutron flux

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple and easy method for measuring the neutron flux is presented. This paper deals with the experimental verification of neutron dose rate–flux relationship for a non-dissipative medium. Though the neutron flux cannot be obtained from the dose rate in a dissipative medium, experimental result shows that for non-dissipative medium one can obtain the neutron flux from dose rate. We have used a 241 AmBe neutron source for neutron irradiation, and the neutron dose rate and count rate were measured using a NM2B neutron monitor and R-12 superheated droplet detector (SDD), respectively. Here, the neutron flux inferred from the neutron count rate obtained with R-12 SDD shows an excellent agreement with the flux inferred from the neutron dose rate in a non-dissipative medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P K Mondal and B K Chatterjee, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 604, 662 (2009)

  2. R Sarkar, B K Chatterjee and S C Roy, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 219, 203 (2010)

  3. R Sarkar, M Datta and B K Chatterjee, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 682, 31 (2012)

  4. P K Mondal and B K Chatterjee, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 77, 61 (2013)

  5. P K Mondal, R Sarkar and B K Chatterjee, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 90, 1 (2014)

  6. M Das, R Sarkar, P K Mondal, S Saha, B K Chatterjee and S C Roy, Pramana – J. Phys. 75, 675 (2010)

  7. R E Apfel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 162, 603 (1979)

  8. S C Roy, R E Apfel and Y C Lo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 255, 199 (1987)

  9. S C Roy and B Roy, Curr. Sci. 84, 516 (2003)

  10. B Roy, B K Chatterjee and S C Roy, Radiat. Meas. 29, 173 (1998)

  11. R Sarkar, B K Chatterjee, B Roy and S C Roy, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75, 2186 (2006)

  12. M Das, B K Chatterjee, B Roy and S C Roy, Phys. Rev. E 62, 5843 (2000)

  13. W J McNeil et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 604, 127 (2009)

  14. S V Rozov et al, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 74, 464 (2010)

  15. V A Kudryavtsev, N J C Spooner and J E McMillan, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 505, 688 (2003)

  16. N S Bowden, M Heffner, G Carosi, D Carter, M Foxe and I Jovanovic, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report No. LLNL-CONF-413682 (2009)

  17. R E Apfel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 179, 615 (1981)

  18. B Roy, M Das, S C Roy and B K Chatterjee, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 61, 509 (2001)

  19. P K Mondal and B K Chatterjee, Phys. Lett. A 375, 237 (2011)

  20. M Felizardo et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 589, 72 (2008)

  21. M Barnabe-Heider et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 555, 184 (2005)

  22. R Sarkar, B K Chatterjee, B Roy and S C Roy, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71, 735 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgements

R Sarkar thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India for the financial assistance during this work. P K Mondal thanks the University Grants Commission (UGC) for the financial assistance provided for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RUPA SARKAR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SARKAR, R., MONDAL, P.K. & CHATTERJEE, B.K. An alternative method for the measurement of neutron flux. Pramana - J Phys 85, 685–690 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0901-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0901-8

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation