Skip to main content
Log in

Gauge boson production at colliders – Predictions for precision studies

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The status of today’s theoretical description of Standard Model (SM) processes involving gauge bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC, and of the tools that are used in their phenomenological studies are reviewed. A few recent ideas to further improve on the way technically challenging calculations can be performed also are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDF Collaboration: T Aaltonen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 , 131801 (2010), arXiv:0909.1505 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. CDF Collaboration: T Aaltonen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 171801 (2011), arXiv:1104.0699 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2011/wjj/

  4. T Plehn and M Takeuchi, J. Phys. G38, 095006 (2011), arXiv:1104.408 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J M Campbell, A Martin and C Williams, Phys. Rev. D84, 036005 (2011), arXiv:1105.4594 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Z Sullivan and A Menon, arXiv:1108.4676 [hep-ph]

  7. D0 Collaboration: V M Abazov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 011804 (2011), arXiv:1106.1921 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsEWK

  9. S Catani, L Cieri, G Ferrera, D de Florian and M Grazzini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082001 (2009), arXiv:0903.2120 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R Gavin, Y Li, F Petriello and S Quackenbush, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2388 (2011), arXiv:1011.3540 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G Bozzi, S Catani, G Ferrera, D de Florian and M Grazzini, Phys. Lett. B696, 207 (2011), arXiv:1007.2351 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Q H Cao, C R Chen, C Schmidt and C P Yuan, arXiv:0909.2305 [hep-ph]

  13. CMS Collaboration: S Chatrchyan et al, arXiv:1108.0566 [hep-ex]

  14. CMS collaboration, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsEWK

  15. G Balossini, G Montagna, C M Carloni Calame, M Moretti, O Nicrosini, F Piccinini, M Treccani and A Vicini, J. High Energy Phys. 1001, 013 (2010), arXiv:0907.0276 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H L Lai, M Guzzi, J Huston, Z Li, P M Nadolsky, J Pumplin and C P Yuan, Phys. Rev. D82, 074024 (2010), arXiv:1007.2241 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A D Martin, W J Stirling, R S Thorne and G Watt, Eur. Phys. J. C63, 189 (2009), arXiv:0901.0002 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. The NNPDF Collaboration: R D Ball et al, arXiv:1107.2652 [hep-ph]

  19. ATLAS Collaboration: G Aad et al, Phys. Lett. B701, 31 (2011), arXiv:1103.2929 [hep-ex]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R D Ball, V Bertone, F Cerutti, L Del Debbio, S Forte, A Guffanti, N P Hartland and J I Latorre et al, Nucl. Phys. B855, 608 (2012), arXiv:1108.1758 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. The ATLAS Collaboration: S Ask, arXiv:1106.2061 [hep-ex]

  22. Of course, this statement depends on the precise definition of the jets, in particular on their p t cut.

  23. Frank Petriello, These proceedings

  24. R K Ellis, Z Kunszt, K Melnikov and G Zanderighi, arXiv:1105.4319 [hep-ph]

  25. R K Ellis, G Martinelli and R Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B211, 106 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W T Giele, E W N Glover and D A Kosower, Phys. Lett. B309, 205 (1993), hep-ph/9305220

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Z Bern, L J Dixon and D A Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B513, 3 (1998), hep-ph/9708239

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Z Nagy and Z Trocsanyi, Phys. Rev. D59, 014020 (1999), Erratum, ibid. D62, 099902 (2000), hep-ph/9806317

  29. J M Campbell and R K Ellis, Phys. Rev. D65, 113007 (2002), hep-ph/0202176

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J M Campbell, R K Ellis and G Zanderighi, J. High Energy Phys. 0712, 056 (2007), arXiv:0710.1832 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S Dittmaier, S Kallweit and P Uwer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 062003 (2008), arXiv:0710.1577 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. T Binoth, T Gleisberg, S Karg, N Kauer and G Sanguinetti, Phys. Lett. B683, 154 (2010), arXiv:0911.3181 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. F Campanario, C Englert, S Kallweit, M Spannowsky and D Zeppenfeld, J. High Energy Phys. 1007, 076 (2010), arXiv:1006.0390 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R K Ellis, K Melnikov and G Zanderighi, Phys. Rev. D80, 094002 (2009), arXiv:0906.1445 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. C F Berger, Z Bern, L J Dixon, F Febres Cordero, D Forde, T Gleisberg, H Ita, D A Kosower et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 222001 (2009), arXiv:0902.2760 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. C F Berger, Z Bern, L J Dixon, F Febres Cordero, D Forde, T Gleisberg, H Ita, D A Kosower et al, Phys. Rev. D82, 074002 (2010), arXiv:1004.1659 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. T Melia, K Melnikov, R Rontsch and G Zanderighi, J. High Energy Phys. 1012, 053 (2010), arXiv:1007.5313 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. T Melia, K Melnikov, R Rontsch and G Zanderighi, Phys. Rev. D83, 114043 (2011), arXiv:1104.2327 [hep-ph]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. G Bevilacqua, M Czakon, A van Hameren, C G Papadopoulos and M Worek, J. High Energy Phys. 1102, 083 (2011), arXiv:1012.4230 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A Denner, S Dittmaier, S Kallweit and S Pozzorini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052001 (2011), arXiv:1012.3975 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. C F Berger, Z Bern, L J Dixon, F Febres Cordero, D Forde, T Gleisberg, H Ita, D A Kosower et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 092001 (2011), arXiv:1009.2338 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. H Ita, Z Bern, L J Dixon, F F Cordero, D A Kosower and D Maitre, arXiv:1108.2229 [hep-ph]

  43. K Arnold, J Bellm, G Bozzi, M Brieg, F Campanario, C Englert, B Feigl, J Frank et al, arXiv:1107.4038 [hep-ph]

  44. S Frixione, F Stoeckli, P Torrielli, B R Webber and C D White, arXiv:1010.0819 [hep-ph]

  45. P Nason, J. High Energy Phys. 0411, 040 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0409146 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. S Alioli, P Nason, C Oleari and E Re, J. High Energy Phys. 1006, 043 (2010), arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. J M Campbell and R K Ellis, Phys. Rev. D60, 113006 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9905386

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. J M Campbell, R K Ellis and C Williams, J. High Energy Phys. 1107, 018 (2011), arXiv:1105.0020 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. T Melia, P Nason, R Rontsch and G Zanderighi, J. High Energy Phys. 1111, 078 (2011), arXiv:1107.5051 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. CDF Collaboration: T Aaltonen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 201801 (2010), arXiv:0912.4500 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. D0 Collaboration: V M Abazov et al, Phys. Rev. D80, 053012 (2009), arXiv:0907.4398 [hep-ex]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. D0 Collaboration: V M Abazov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191801 (2009), arXiv:0904.0673 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration and LEP Electroweak Working Group: J Alcaraz et al, arXiv:hep-ex/0612034

  54. K Hagiwara, S Ishihara, R Szalapski and D Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. D48, 2182 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. CMS Collaboration: S Chatrchyan et al, Phys. Lett. B699, 25 (2011), arXiv:1102.5429 [hep-ex]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. K Hagiwara, R D Peccei, D Zeppenfeld and K Hikasa, Nucl. Phys. B282, 253 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. U Baur and D Zeppenfeld, Phys. Lett. B201, 383 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. U Baur and D Zeppenfeld, Nucl. Phys. B308, 127 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. R Frederix, S Frixione, V Hirschi, F Maltoni, R Pittau and P Torrielli, arXiv:1110.4738 [hep-ph]

  60. V Hirschi, R Frederix, S Frixione, M V Garzelli, F Maltoni and R Pittau, J. High Energy Phys. 1105, 044 (2011), arXiv:1103.0621 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. T Melia, P Nason, R Rontsch and G Zanderighi, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1670 (2011), arXiv:1102.4846 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. B Jager and G Zanderighi, J. High Energy Phys. 1111, 055 (2011), arXiv:1108.0864 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. R Frederix, S Frixione, V Hirschi, F Maltoni, R Pittau and P Torrielli, J. High Energy Phys. 1109, 061 (2011), arXiv:1106.6019 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. R Frederix, S Frixione, V Hirschi, F Maltoni, R Pittau and P Torrielli, arXiv:1110.5502 [hep-ph]

  65. K Hamilton and P Nason, J. High Energy Phys. 1006, 039 (2010), arXiv:1004.1764 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. S Alioli, K Hamilton and E Re, arXiv:1108.0909 [hep-ph]

  67. M Rubin, G P Salam and S Sapeta, J. High Energy Phys. 1009, 084 (2010), arXiv:1006.2144 [hep-ph] [68]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GIULIA ZANDERIGHI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ZANDERIGHI, G. Gauge boson production at colliders – Predictions for precision studies. Pramana - J Phys 79, 603–616 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-012-0366-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-012-0366-6

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation