Skip to main content
Log in

Problems with tunneling of thin shells from black holes

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that exp(−2 Im(∫ p dr)) is not invariant under canonical transformations in general. Specifically for shells tunneling out of black holes, this quantity is not invariant under canonical transformations. It can be interpreted as the transmission coefficient only in the cases in which it is invariant under canonical transformations. Although such cases include alpha decay, they do not include the tunneling of shells from black holes. The simplest extension to this formula which is invariant under canonical transformations is proposed. However, it is shown that this gives half the correct temperature for black holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S W Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), Erratum, Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J B Hartle and S W Hawking, Phys. Rev. D13, 2188 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S B Giddings, The black hole information paradox, arXiv:hep-th/9508151

  4. W Israel, Nuovo Cimento B44S10, 1 (1966), Erratum, Nuovo Cimento B48, 463 (1967) NUCIA,B44,1.1966

    Google Scholar 

  5. P Kraus and F Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B433, 403 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9408003

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M K Parikh and F Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9907001

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E T Akhmedov, V Akhmedova, T Pilling and D Singleton, arXiv:hep-th/0605137.

  8. S Q Wu and Q Q Jiang, arXiv:hep-th/0603082

  9. Y P Hu, J Y Zhang and Z Zhao, arXiv:gr-qc/0601018

  10. M Arzano, Phys. Lett. B634, 536 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512071

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. I Radinschi, arXiv:gr-qc/0511142

  12. M Nadalini, L Vanzo and S Zerbini, J. Phys. A39, 6601 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0511250

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A J M Medved and E C Vagenas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A20, 2449 (2005), arXiv:grqc/0504113

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R Kerner and R B Mann, Phys. Rev. D73, 104010 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603019

  15. K Melnikov and M Weinstein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13, 1595 (2004), arXiv:hepth/0205223

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J G Zhang, Y P Hu and Z Zhao, arXiv:hep-th/0512121

  17. M B Einhorn, arXiv:hep-th/0510148

  18. B Greene, M Parikh and J P van der Schaar, arXiv:hep-th/0512243

  19. V D Gladush, J. Math. Phys. 42, 2590 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0001073

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. V A Rubakov, Classical theory of gauge fields (Princeton University Press, USA, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. E Poisson, A relativist’s toolkit (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M Heusler, C Kiefer and N Straumann, Phys. Rev. D42, 4254 (1990), Erratum, Phys. Rev. D44, 1342 (1991)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. K Srinivasan and T Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D60, 024007 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9812028

  24. Here outer horizon means the outer horizon of a multiple horizon black hole and not the horizon of the outer manifold of the shell. In [2] since there are only test shells, there is just one manifold

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borun D. Chowdhury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chowdhury, B.D. Problems with tunneling of thin shells from black holes. Pramana - J Phys 70, 3–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-008-0001-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-008-0001-8

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation