Abstract
I present a short overview of current observational results and theoretical models for a cosmological constant. The main motivation for invoking a small cosmological constant (or A-term) at the present epoch has to do with observations of high redshift Type Ia supernovae which suggest an accelerating universe. A flat accelerating universe is strongly favoured by combining supernovae observations with observations of CMB anisotropies on degree scales which give the ‘best-fit’ values ΘA ⋍ 0.7 and Θ m ⋍ 0.3. A time dependent cosmological A-term can be generated by scalar field models with exponential and power law potentials. Some of these models can alleviate the ‘fine tuning’ problem which faces the cosmological constant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A Albrecht and C Skordis, (1999) astro-ph/9908085
I Antoniadis, S Dimopoulos and G Dvali, Nucl. Phys. B516, 70 (1998)
T Barreiro, E J Copeland and N J Nunes, astro-ph/9910214
R A Battye, M Bucher and D Spergel, astro-ph/9908047 (1999)
K Benakli, Phys. Rev D60, 104002 (1999)
M C Bento and O Bertolami, gr-qc/9905075 (1999)
P Binetruy, Phys. Rev. D60, 0635002 (1999)
E Branchina, hep-ph/0002013
P Brax and J Martin, astro-ph/9905040 (1999)
P Brax and J Martin, astro-ph/9912046 (1999)
S M Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3067 (1998)
K Choi, hep-ph/9902292 (1999)
K Choi, hep-ph/9912218 (1999)
D Cormier and R Holman, hep-ph/0001168
P G Ferreira and M Joyce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4740 (1997)
J Frieman, C T Hill, A Stebbins and I Waga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2077 (1995)
D Huterer and M S Turner, Phys. Rev. D60 81301 (1999)
C Kolda and D H Lyth, hep-ph/9811375 (1998)
E J Lidsey, A R Liddle, E W Kolb, E J Copeland, T Barreiro and M Abney, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 373 (1997)
A Masiero, M Pietroni and F Rosati, Phys. Rev. D61, 023504 (2000)
A Melchiorri et al. astro-ph/9911445
B Ratra and P J E Peebles, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988)
L Parker and A Raval, Phys. Rev. D60, 063512 (1999)
J A Peacock, Cosmological Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1999)
S J Perlmutter et al, Nature 391, 51 (1998a)
S J Perlmutter et al, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)
P J E Peebles and B Ratra, Astrophys. J. 325, L17 (1988)
A G Riess et al, Astrophys. J. 116, 1009 (1998)
T D Saini, S Raychaudhury, V Sahni and A Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2000) (in press)
V Sahni and S Habib, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1766 (1998)
V Sahni and L Wang (1999) astro-ph/9910097
V Sahni and A A Starobinsky (1999) astro-ph/9904398 (IJMP (D) (in press))
A A Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 68, 757 (1998)
A Vilenkin, Phys. Rep. 121, 263 (1985)
I Waga and A M R Miceli, Phys. Rev. D59, 103507 (1999)
I Waga and J A Frieman (2000) astro-ph/0001354
S Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989)
C Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B302, 668 (1988)
Ya B Zeldovich, Sov. Phys. — Uspekhi 95, 209 (1968)
I Zlatev, L Wang and P J Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999)
B Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B89, 535 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahni, V. The case for the cosmological constant. Pramana - J Phys 55, 43–52 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-000-0082-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-000-0082-5