Skip to main content
Log in

Results from atmospheric neutrinos

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the announcement of new evidence for muon neutrino disappearance observed by the super-Kamiokande experiment, the more than a decade old atmospheric neutrino anomaly moved from a possible indication for neutrino oscillations to an apparently inescapable fact. The evidence is reviewed, and new indications are presented that the oscillations are probably between muon and tau neutrinos. Implications and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J Haines et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1986 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. IMB Collaboration: R Clark et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 345 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R Becker-Szendy et al, Phys. Rev. D46, 3720 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D Casper et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2561 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamiokande Collaboration: Y Oyama et al, hep-ex/9706008 (1997)

  6. K S Hirata et al, Phys. Lett. B205, 416 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. K S Hirata et al, Phys. Lett. B280, 146 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y Fukuda et al, Phys. Lett. B335, 237 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. John G Learned, Sandip Pakvasa and Thomas J Weiler, Phys. Lett. B207, 79 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V Barger and K Whisnant, Phys. Lett. B209, 365 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. K Hidaka, M Honda and S Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1537 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paolo Lipari, T K Gaisser and Todor Stanev, Phys. Rev. D58, 73003 (1998) preprint astroph/9803093, and references therein

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. See also report of Atmospheric Neutrino Working Group, D Casper et al, in these Proceedings

  14. http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/doc/sk/pub/

  15. The super-Kamiokande Collaboration: Y Fukuda et al, Phys. Lett. B433, 9 (1998), preprint hep-ex/9803006

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. The super-Kamiokande Collaboration: Y Fukuda et al, Phys. Lett. B436, 33 (1998) hep-ex/9805006

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. The super-Kamiokande Collaboration: T Futagami et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5194 (1999) preprint astro-ph/9901139

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. The super-Kamiokande Collaboration: Y Fukuda et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998) preprint hep-ex/9807003

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Measurement of the flux and zenith-angle distribution of upward through-going muons by super-Kamiokande, The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration: Y Fukuda et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2644 (1999) preprint hep-ex/9812014

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. John W Flanagan, John G Learned and Sandip Pakvasa, Phys. Rev. D57, 2649 (1998) preprint hep-ph/9709438

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Also see J W Flanagan dissertation, UH 1997, available at the SK web page

  22. See PhD dissertation of M Messier, BU 1999 for derivation of the correction used for translating observed energy into L/E. This author has used a different form and definition in the past. The figure presented is the SuperK official plot

  23. V Barger, J G Learned, S Pakvasa and T J Weiler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2640 (1999) preprint astro-ph/9810121

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. V Barger, J G Learned, P Lipari, M Lusignoli, S Pakvasa and T J Weiler, Phys. Lett. B462, 109 (1999) preprint hep-ph/9907421

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. P Antonioli et al, to be published in NIM in the Proceedings of the RICH98 Workshop in Israel, preprint CERN-LAA/99-03, 5/5/99, and talk of T Ypsilantis at this Workshop

  26. Nonetheless, this author (personal opinion, not collaboration) suspects that the process pulls the minima slightly towards lower values of δm 2. The reasoning is that the introduced parameters un-weight the effect of R on the fitting, which pulls upwards, while the shape pulls downwards. The author’s bet remains that δm 2 settles at around 5 × 10−3 eV2, whereas the official fits give 2.5 to 3.5

  27. A D Sakharov, JETP Lett. 5, 24 (1967)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. V A Kuzmin, JETP Lett. 12, 228 (1970)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baryogenesis via neutrino oscillations, E Kh Akhmedov, V A Rubakov and A Yu Smirnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1359 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Learned, J.G. Results from atmospheric neutrinos. Pramana - J Phys 55, 3–18 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-000-0079-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-000-0079-0

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation