Skip to main content
Log in

Response of Endogenous Hormone Concentrations to Two Floral Inductive Treatments, viz. KNO3 and PBZ, in Mango cv. ‘Tommy Atkins’ Growing Under Tropical Conditions

  • Published:
Tropical Plant Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floral induction (FI) has been intensively studied in mango, more under sub-tropical than under tropical environments. Decreases in temperature below 20 °C, which is common in sub-tropical regions but seldom occurs in many tropical ones, has been considered a critical factor for FI in this species. Trying to understand the way by which two FI treatments, potassium nitrate (KNO3) and paclobutrazol (PBZ), can regulate flowering by modulating the endogenous concentrations of plant hormones, the following compounds were analyzed in terminal buds, wood and bark sections of lateral branches from treated and untreated ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango trees growing under tropical conditions: indole-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins (GAs), zeatin/zeatin riboside (Z/ZR) and N 62-isopentenyl) adenine/N 62-isopentenyl) adenosine. Behavior in the contents of these endogenous hormones was often irregular but their course was in general similar for all three treatments. However, levels of GAs were consistently lower in most evaluations of wood and bark sections of PBZ-treated trees compared to KNO3-treated and control plants. In contrast, the endogenous levels of the presumably FI promoting Z/ZR raised considerably at the time close to FI in buds of KNO3-treated trees. These KNO3-treated trees flowered earlier and more profusely than those from other treatments. Although PBZ could be related in this work to a reduction in GA contents, no direct influence of this compound over FI could be established. KNO3 might partially exert its promoting effect on mango FI by increasing Z/ZR contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bally ISE, Harris M, Whiley AW (2000) Effect of water stress on flowering and yield of ‘Kensington Pride’ mango (Mangifera indica L). Acta Horticult 509:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangerth F (2006) Flower induction in perennial fruit trees: still an enigma? Acta Horticult 727:177–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bangerth KF (2009) Floral induction in mature, perennial angiosperm fruit trees: similarities and discrepancies with annual/biennial plants and the involvement of plant hormones. Sci Hortic 122(2):153–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G (2003) The role of cytokinins in the floral transition process revisited. Flower Newsl 36:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P (1993) Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5(10):1147–1155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie SJ, Kulkarni VJ, Müller WJ (2004) Effects of morphactin and paclobutrazol flowering treatments on shoot and root phenology in mango cv. Kensington Pride. Sci Hortic 101(1–2):51–68. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2003.09.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bondad ND, Linsangan E (1979) Flowering in mango induced with potassium nitrate. HortScience 14(4):527–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WS (1987) Endogenous growth substances in relation to shoot growth and flower bud development of mango. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:360–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TL (2003) Management of flowering in three tropical and subtropical fruit tree species. HortScience 38(7):1331–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TL (ed) (2009) Reproductive physiology. The mango: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca N, Castro Neto MT, Ledo CAS (2005) Paclobutrazol e estresse hídrico no florescimento e produção da mangueira (Mangifera indica) ‘Tommy Atkins’. Rev Bras Frutic 27(1):21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt EE, Tamim M, Goren R (1997) Gibberellins and flowering in citrus and other fruit trees: a critical analysis. Acta Horticult 463:201–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González A, Lu P, Müller W (2004) Effect of pre-flowering irrigation on leaf photosynthesis, whole-tree water use and fruit yield of mango trees receiving two flowering treatments. Sci Hortic 102(2):189–211. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2003.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström I, Soto-Manitiu J, Jirón LF (1986) Efecto de una interrupción de la estación lluviosa sobre la floración del mango (Mangifera indica) en el Pacífico Seco de Costa Rica. Agron Costarric 10(1–2):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez VM, Guevara E, Herrera J, Bangerth F (2005) Evolution of endogenous hormone concentration in embryogenic cultures of carrot during early expression of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep 23(8):567–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Chacko EK (2000) Effect of water stress on mango flowering in low latitude tropics of Northern Australia. Acta Horticult 509:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee SK, Litz RE (eds) (2009) Introduction: botany and importance. The mango: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Naphrom D, Sruamsiri P, Hegele M, Boonplod N, Bangerth F, Manochai P (2004) Hormonal changes in various tissues of mango trees during flower induction following cold temperature. Acta Horticult 645:453–457

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CM, Browning G (1993) Gibberellin structure-activity effects on flower initiation in mature trees and on shoot growth in mature and juvenile Prunus avium. Plant Growth Regul 13(1):55–63. doi:10.1007/bf00207592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Barraza MH, Vázquez-Valdivia V, Osuna-García JA (2009) Floral bud development of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango under tropical condition in Nayarit, Mexico. Acta Horticult 820:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Prang L (2000) Zur hormonellen Regulation der Blüteninduktion beim Apfel (Malus domestica Borkh.) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gibberelline. University of Hohenheim

  • Prang L, Stephan M, Schneider G, Bangerth F (1998) Gibberellin signals originating from apple fruit and their possible involvement in flower induction. Acta Horticult 463:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher W (2000) Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51(1):501–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez F, Davenport TL, Fischer G (2010) The number of leaves required for floral induction and translocation of the florigenic promoter in mango (Mangifera indica L.) in a tropical climate. Sci Hortic 123(4):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas E (1996) Efecto del nitrato de calcio en la brotación floral y vegetativa del mango (Mangifera indica) cv. Haden. Rev Fac Agron (Venezuela) 22(1-2):37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto CJ, Bortoletto N, Vidigal de Castro J, Limonta Carvalho CR, Igue T (2004) Response of mango varieties to pachlobutrazol. Acta Horticult 654:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-García S, Pérez-Barraza MH, Vázquez-Valdivia V (2000) Effect of ammonium nitrate sprays on flowering and harvest time of ‘Manila’, ‘Ataulfo’, and ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango in Nayarit, Mexico. Acta Horticult 509:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon E, Reuveni O (1994) Effect of paclobutrazol treatment on the growth and first flowering of intact and autografted seedlings of mango. Sci Hortic 60(1–2):81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent E, Ferrari D, Leal F (1997) Effects of potasium nitrate and paclobutrazol on flowering induction and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Haden. Acta Horticult 455:180–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shu ZH, Sheen TF (1987) Floral induction in axillary buds of mango (Mangifera indica L.) as affected by temperature. Sci Hortic 31(1–2):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano-Segura M (1998) Respuesta de mango (cv. Tommy Atkins) al uso de tres inductores de floración y al método de decapitación de yemas terminales en la provincia de Alajuela. Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhvibul N, Whiley AW, Smith MK, Hetherington SE, Vithanage V (1999) Effect of temperature on inflorescence and floral development in four mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. Sci Hortic 82(1–2):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongumpai P, Subhadrabandhu S, Suppakitjarak N, Ketsa S (1997) Study of paclobutrazol on mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Khiew Sawoey I. Effect on gibberellin-like substances in terminal shoot and flowering. Thai J Agric Sci 30:147–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeshitela T, Robbertse PJ, Stassen PJC (2004) Effects of various inductive periods and chemicals on flowering and vegetative growth of ‘Tommy Atkins’ and ‘Keitt’ mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 32(2):209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the collaboration of personnel from Inversiones Acón Ulloa & Chan S.A. for the agricultural management of the experimental plot and application of products, as well as the help of A. Azofeifa, L. Barboza, E. Tavares, E. Rodríguez, G. Solano, J. Calvo and P. Esquivel during sampling. EG received financial support from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) in form of a short-time fellowship and gratefully acknowledges it. This investigation was partially funded by the University of Costa Rica (project number VI-734-A5-180).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Guevara.

Additional information

Communicated by: Desiree M. Hautea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guevara, E., Jiménez, V.M. & Bangerth, F.K. Response of Endogenous Hormone Concentrations to Two Floral Inductive Treatments, viz. KNO3 and PBZ, in Mango cv. ‘Tommy Atkins’ Growing Under Tropical Conditions. Tropical Plant Biol. 5, 253–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-012-9107-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-012-9107-8

Keywords

Navigation