Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 505–508 | Cite as

Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target

  • Marcus W. Feldman
  • John Odling-Smee
  • Kevin N. Laland
Comments

Abstract

Gupta et al., in their article in this issue (‘Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche?’. doi: 10.1007/s12041-017-0787-6), lament ‘serious problems with the way science is being done’ and suggest that ‘niche construction theory exemplifies this state of affairs.’ However, their aggressively confrontational but superficial critique of niche construction theory (NCT) only contributes to these problems by attacking claims that NCT does not make. This is unfortunate, as their poor scholarship has done a disservice to the evolutionary biology community through propagating misinformation. We correct Gupta et al.’s misunderstandings, stressing that NCT does not suggest that the fact that organisms engage in niche construction is neglected, nor does it make strong claims on the basis of its formal theory. Moreover, the treatment of niche construction as an evolutionary process has been highly productive, and is both theoretically and empirically well-validated. We end by reflecting on the potentially deleterious implications of their publication for evolutionary science.

Keywords

niche construction evolutionary biology 

References

  1. Bickerton D. 2009 Adam’s tongue. Hill and Wang, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Erwin D. H. and Valentine J. W. 2013 The Cambrian explosion. Roberts and Co., Greenwood Village, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Fuentes A. 2009 Evolution of human behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Gupta M., Prasad N. G., Dey S., Joshi A. and Vidya T. N. C. 2017 Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche? J. Genet. 96. doi: 10.1007/s12041-017-0787-6
  5. Kendal J., Tehrani J. J. and Odling-Smee F. J. 2011 Human niche construction in interdisciplinary focus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 785–792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Laland K. N., Matthews B. and Feldman M. W. 2016 An introduction to niche construction theory. Evol. Ecol. 30, 191–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewontin R. C. 1982 Organism and environment. In Learning, development and culture (ed. E. C. Plotkin). Wiley, Hoboken, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Lewontin R. C. 1983 Gene, organism, and environment. In Evolution from molecules to men (ed. D. S. Bendall), pp. 273–285. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Lewontin R. C. 2000 The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Odling-Smee F. J., Laland K. N. and Feldman M. W. 2003 Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Scott-Phillips T. C., Laland K. N., Shuker D. M., Dickins T. E. and West S. A. 2014 The niche construction perspective. A critical appraisal. Evolution 68, 1231–1243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith B. 2007 Human niche construction and the behavioral context of plant and animal domestication. Evol. Anthro. 16, 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sultan S. E. 2015 Organism and environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Uller T. and Helanterä H. 2017 Niche construction and conceptual change in evolutionary biology. Br. J. Philos. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Zeder M. A. 2015 Core questions in domestication research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3191–3198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus W. Feldman
    • 1
  • John Odling-Smee
    • 2
  • Kevin N. Laland
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Mansfield CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.University of St Andrews School of BiologySt AndrewsScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations