Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative cytogenetic analysis of four species of Dendropsophus (Hylinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic forest

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted a cytogenetic study of four hyline frog species (Dendropsophus elegans, D. microps, D. minutus and D. werneri) from southern Brazil. All species had 2n = 30 chromosomes, with interspecific and intraspecific variation in the numbers of metacentric, submetacentric, subtelocentric and telocentric chromosomes. C-banding and fluorochrome staining revealed conservative GC-rich heterochromatin localized in the pericentromeric regions of all species. The location of the nucleolus organizer regions, as confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, differed between species. Telomeric probes detected sites that were restricted to the terminal regions of all chromosomes and no interstitial or centromeric signals were observed. Our study corroborates the generic synapomorphy of 2n = 30 chromosomes for Dendropsophus and adds data that may become useful for future taxonomic revisions and a broader understanding of chromosomal evolution among hylids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaro-Ghilardi R. C., Silva M. J. J., Rodrigues M. T. and Yonenaga-Yassuda Y. 2008 Chromosomal studies in four species of genus Chaunus (Bufonidae, Anura): localization of telomeric and ribosomal sequences after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetica 134, 159–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badissera Jr F. A., Oliveira P. S. L. and Kasahara S. 1993 Cytogenetics of four Brazilian Hyla species (Amphibia, Anura) and description of a case of supernumerary chromosome. Rev. Brasil Gen. 16, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart J. 1973 Evolution of anuran karyotypes. In: Evolutionary biology of Anurans (ed. J. Vial). University of Missouri Press, Columbia.

  • Campos J. R. C., Ananaias F., Brasileiro C., Yamamoto M., Haddad C. F. B. and Kasahara S. 2009 Chromosome evolution in three Brazilian Leptodactylus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with phylogenetic considerations. Hereditas 146, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catroli G. F. and Kasahara S. 2009 Cytogenetic data on species of the family Hylidae (Amphibia, Anura): results and perspectives. Publ. UEPG CiBiol. Saúde 15, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho K. A., Garcia P. C. and Recco-Pimentel S. M. 2009 NOR dispersion, telomeric sequence detection in centromeric regions and meiotic multivalent configurations in species of the Aplastodiscus albofrenatus group (Anura, Hylidae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 126, 359–367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Datson P. M. and Murray B. G. 2006 Ribosomal DNA locus evolution in Nemesia: transposition rather than structural rearrangement as the key mechanism? Chromosome Res. 14, 845–857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faivovich J., Haddad C. F. B., Garcia P. C. A., Frost D. R., Campbell, J. A. and Wheeler W. D. 2005 A systematics review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to the Hylinae, a phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 294, 1–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouquet A., Noona B. P., Blanc M. and Orrico V. G. D. 2011 New distributional records and phylogenetic position for Dendropsophus gaucheri. Zootaxa 3035, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost D. R. 2014 Amphibian species of the world: an online reference, version 6.0 (accessed on 13th March 2014). Electronic database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html.

  • Green D. M. and Sessions S. K. 1991 Nomenclature for chromosomes. In Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution (ed. D. M. Green and S. K. Sessions). Academic Press, San Diego.

  • Gruber S. L., Haddad C. F. B. and Kasahara S. 2005 Evaluating the karyotypic diversity in species of Hyla (Anura; Hylidae) with 2n = 30 chromosomes based on the analysis of ten species. Folia Biol. 51, 68–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka T. and Galetti P. M. 2004 Mapping of the 18S and 5S ribosomal RNA genes in the fish Prochilodus argenteus Agassiz, 1829 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Genetica 122, 239–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell W. M. and Black D. A. 1980 Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer. Experientia 36, 1014–1015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ijdo J. W., Wells R. A., Baldini A. and Reeders S. T. 1991 Improved telomere detection using a telomere repeat probe (TTAGGG) generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 4780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2013 The IUCN red list of threatened species, version 2013.2 (accessed on 2nd February 2013). Electronic database accessible at http://www.iucnredlist.org.

  • Kaiser H., Mais C., Bolaños F., Steinlein C., Feichtinger W. and Schmid M. 1996 Chromosomal investigation of three Costa Rican frogs from the 30-chromosome radiation of Hyla with the description of a unique geographic variation in nucleolus organizer regions. Genetica 98, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg R. 1932 Mexican tailless amphibians in the United States National Museum. Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus. 160, 1–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • King M., Contreras N. and Honeycutt R. L. 1990 Variation within and between nucleolar organizer regions in Australian hylid frogs (Anura) shown by 18S + 28S in-situ hybridization. Genetica 80, 17–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros L. R., Rossa-Feres D. C. and Recco-Pimentel S. M. 2003 Chromosomal differentiation of Hyla nana and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) with a description of NOR polymorphism in H. nana. J. Hered. 94, 149–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros L. R., Rossa-Feres D. C., Jim J. and Recco-Pimentel S. M. 2006 B-chromosomes in two Brazilian populations of Dendropsophus nanus (Anura, Hylidae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 29, 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros L. R., Lourenço L. B., Rossa-Feres D. C., Lima A. P., Andrade G. V., Giaretta A. et al. 2013 Comparative cytogenetic analysis of some species of the Dendropsophus microcephalus group (Anura, Hylidae) in the light of phylogenetic inferences. BMC Genet. 14, 59–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noleto R. B., Amaro R. C., Verdade V. K., Campos J. R. C., Gallego L. F. K., Lima A. M. X. et al. 2011 Comparative cytogenetics of eight species of Cycloramphus (Anura, Cycloramphidae). Zool. Anz. 250, 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyron R. A. and Wiens J. J. 2011 A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61, 543–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rocchi M., Archidiacono N., Schempp W., Capozzi O. and Stanyon R. 2012 Centromere repositioning in mammals. Heredity 108, 59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M., Steinlein C., Bogart J. P., Feichtinger W., León P., La Marca E. et al. 2010 The chromosomes of terraranan frogs. Insights into vertebrate cytogenetics. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 130–131, 1–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D. 1981 Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding. Hum. Genet. 57, 1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skuk G. and Langone J. A. 1992 Los cromosomas de cuatroespeciesdel género Hyla (Anura: Hylidae) com número diploide de 2n = 30. Acta Zool. Lilloana 41, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez P., Cardozo D., Baldo D., Pereyra M. O., Faivovich J., Orrico V. G. D. et al. 2013 Chromosome evolution in Dendropsophini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 141, 295–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner A. 1972 A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 75, 304–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsipouri V., Schueler M. G., Hu S., NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Dutra A., Pak E. et al. 2008 Comparative sequence analyses reveal sites of ancestral chromosomal fusions in the Indian muntjac genome. Genome Biol. 9, R155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J. J., Kuczynski C. A., Hua X. and Moen D. S. 2010 An expanded phylogeny of treefrogs (Hylidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 55, 871–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woznicki P., Sanchez L., Martinez P., Pardo B. G. and Jankun M. 2000 A population analysis of the structure and variability of NOR in Salmo trutta by Ag, CMA 3 and ISH. Genetica 108, 113–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our thanks to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that improved the manuscript; Michele Orane, Luiz Fernando Kraft, Rafael Balen and Gisele Perazzo for help in lab work; the Grassmann family for permision to collect on their property; and Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Instituto Ambiental do Paraná for environmental licenses. Besides, we are very grateful to Dr Mark A. McPeek for revising the English style of the manuscript. This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico eTecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-862, Campinas, SP, Brazil

    IGOR SOARES DE OLIVEIRA & LUÍS FELIPE TOLEDO

  2. Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual do Paraná, Campus União da Vitória, 84600-000, União da Vitória, PR, Brazil

    RAFAEL BUENO NOLETO

  3. Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

    ADRIELE KARLOKOSKI CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA

  4. Laboratório de Citogenética Animal e Mutagênese Ambiental, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

    MARTA MARGARETE CESTARI

Authors
  1. IGOR SOARES DE OLIVEIRA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. RAFAEL BUENO NOLETO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ADRIELE KARLOKOSKI CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. LUÍS FELIPE TOLEDO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. MARTA MARGARETE CESTARI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to IGOR SOARES DE OLIVEIRA.

Additional information

[Oliveira I. S., Noleto R. B., Oliveira A. K. C., Toledo L. F. and Cestari M. M. 2016 Comparative cytogenetic analysis of four species of Dendropsophus (Hylinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J. Genet. 95, xx–xx]

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 532 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SOARES DE OLIVEIRA, I., BUENO NOLETO, R., KARLOKOSKI CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA, A. et al. Comparative cytogenetic analysis of four species of Dendropsophus (Hylinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J Genet 95, 349–355 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-016-0645-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-016-0645-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation