Assessment of genetic diversity in Indian rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.): use of random versus trait-linked microsatellite markers
- 195 Downloads
Assessment of genetic diversity in a crop germplasm is a vital part of plant breeding. DNA markers such as microsatellite or simple sequence repeat markers have been widely used to estimate the genetic diversity in rice. The present study was carried out to decipher the pattern of genetic diversity in terms of both phenotypic and genotypic variability, and to assess the efficiency of random vis-à-vis QTL linked/gene based simple sequence repeat markers in diversity estimation. A set of 88 rice accessions that included landraces, farmer’s varieties and popular Basmati lines were evaluated for agronomic traits and molecular diversity. The random set of SSR markers included 50 diversity panel markers developed under IRRI’s Generation Challenge Programme (GCP) and the trait-linked/gene based markers comprised of 50 SSR markers reportedly linked to yield and related components. For agronomic traits, significant variability was observed, ranging between the maximum for grains/panicle and the minimum for panicle length. The molecular diversity based grouping indicated that varieties from a common centre were genetically similar, with few exceptions. The trait-linked markers gave an average genetic dissimilarity of 0.45 as against that of 0.37 by random markers, along with an average polymorphic information constant value of 0.48 and 0.41 respectively. The correlation between the kinship matrix generated by trait-linked markers and the phenotype based distance matrix (0.29) was higher than that of random markers (0.19). This establishes the robustness of trait-linked markers over random markers in estimating genetic diversity of rice germplasm.
Keywordsgermplasm genetic diversity microsatellite markers principal component analysis
- Ford-Lloyd B. V., Jackson M. T. and Newbury H. J. 1997 Molecular markers and the management of genetic resources in seed genebanks: a case study of rice. In Biotechnology and plant genetic resources: conservation and use (ed. J. A. Callow, B. V. Ford-Lloyd and H. J. Newbury). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
- Hammer Ø., Harper D. A. T. and Ryan P. D. 2001 PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9.Google Scholar
- Kumar S., Bisht I. S. and Bhatt K. V. 2010 Assessment of genetic diversity among rice (Oryza sativa L.) landrace populations under traditional production using microsatellite (SSR) markers. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 1, 474–483.Google Scholar
- Perrier X. and Collet J. P. 2006 DARwin software (http://darwin.cirad.fr/).
- Rai M. 1999 Rice germplasm evaluation and enhancement in India: issues, status, options, and future plan of action. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rice Germplasm Evaluation and Enhancement (ed. J. N. Rutger, J. F. Robinson and R. H. Dilday), pp. 83–91, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Fayetteville, Arkansas.Google Scholar
- Singh B., Mishra M. K. and Naik R. K. 2010 Genetic diversity among some traditional aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L) varieties of orissa. Indian J. Agric. Res. 44, 141–145.Google Scholar
- Sivaranjani A. K. P., Pandey M. K., Sudharshan I., Kumar G. R., Madhav M. S., Sundaram R. M. et al. 2010 Assessment of genetic diversity among basmati and non-basmati aromatic rices of India using SSR markers. Curr. Sci. 99, 221–226.Google Scholar