Skip to main content

Mapping quantitative trait loci for binary trait in the F2:3 design

Abstract

In the analysis of inheritance of quantitative traits with low heritability, an F2:3 design that genotypes plants in F2 and phenotypes plants in F2:3 progeny is often used in plant genetics. Although statistical approaches for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) in the F2:3 design have been well developed, those for binary traits of biological interest and economic importance are seldom addressed. In this study, an attempt was made to map binary trait loci (BTL) in the F2:3 design. The fundamental idea was: the F2 plants were genotyped, all phenotypic values of each F2:3 progeny were measured for binary trait, and these binary trait values and the marker genotype informations were used to detect BTL under the penetrance and liability models. The proposed method was verified by a series of Monte-Carlo simulation experiments. These results showed that maximum likelihood approaches under the penetrance and liability models provide accurate estimates for the effects and the locations of BTL with high statistical power, even under of low heritability. Moreover, the penetrance model is as efficient as the liability model, and the F2:3 design is more efficient than classical F2 design, even though only a single progeny is collected from each F2:3 family. With the maximum likelihood approaches under the penetrance and the liability models developed in this study, we can map binary traits as we can do for quantitative trait in the F2:3 design.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bovenhuis H. and Weller J. I. 1994 Mapping and analysis of dairy cattle quantitative traits loci by maximum likelihood methodology using milk protein genes as genetic markers. Genetics 136, 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman A., Pantalone V. R., Ustun A., Allen F. L. and Landau-Ellisetal D. 2003 Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F2 and F4:6 soybean population. Euphytica 129, 387–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham C. C. and Zeng Z.B. 1996 Deign III with marker loci. Genetics 143, 1437–1456.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y. H. and Wu R. L. 2005 Mapping genome-genome epistasis: a high-dimensional model. Bioinformatics 21, 2447–2455.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster A. P., Laird N. M. and Rubin D. B. 1977 Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D. S. and Mackay T. F. C. 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch R. D., Ragot M. and Gay G. 1996 A generalization of the mixture model in the mapping of quantitative trait loci for progeny from a bi-parental cross of inbred lines. Genetics 143, 571–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C. J. and Zeng Z. B. 1997 Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines. Genetica 101, 47–56.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C. H. 2004 Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci controlling endosperm traits. Genetics 167, 1987–2002.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C. H. 2006 Mapping Quantitative trait loci using the experimental designs of recombinant inbred populations. Genetics 174, 1373–1386.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander E. and Botstein D. 1989 Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121, 185–199.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J., Wang S. C. and Zeng Z.-B. 2006 Multiple-interval mapping for ordinal traits. Genetics 173, 1649–1663.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L., Zhang Y. M. and Xu S. 2005 A quantitative genetics model for viability selection. Heredity 94, 347–355.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z. W. and Wu C. I. 2001 Modeling linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a locus affecting complex dichotomous traits in natural populations. Genetics 158, 1785–1800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre L. M., Coffman C. J. and Doerge R. W. 2001 Detection and localization of a single binary trait locus in experimental populations. Genet. Res. 78, 79–92.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon M. J. and Weller J. I. 1995 Methodology and accuracy of estimation of quantitative trait loci parameters in a half-sib design using maximum likelihood. Genetics 141, 755–770.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T. and Flannery B. P. 2001 Numerical Recipes. In C++: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd version. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron M. D., Kliger E. F., Seroussi E. and Rzra E. 2001 Multiple quantitative trait locus analysis of bovine chromosome 6 in the Israeli Holstein population by a daughter design. Genetics 159, 727–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R. 1972 The maximum likelihood approach to the estimate of liability. Ann. Hum. Genet. 36, 221–231.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weller J. I., Kashi Y. and Soller M. 1990 Power of “daughter” and “granddaughter” designs for genetic mapping of quantitative traits in dairy cattle using genetic markers. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 2525–2537.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C. W., He X. H. and Xu S. Z. 2003 Mapping quantitative loci underlying triploid endosperm traits. Heredity 90, 228–235.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C. W., Zhang Y. M. and Xu S. Z. 2005 An EM algorithm for mapping quantitative resistance loci. Heredity 94, 119–128.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S. Z., Yi N. J., Burke D., Galecki A. and Miller R. 2003 An EM algorithm for mapping binary disease loci: application to fibrosarcoma in a four-way-cross mouse family. Genet. Res. 82, 127–138.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi N. J., Xu S., George V., and Allison D. B. 2004 Mapping multiple quantitative trait loci for complex ordinal traits. Behavior Genetics 34, 3–15

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y. M. and Xu S. Z. 2004 Mapping quantitative trait loci in F2 incorporating phenotypes of F3 progeny. Genetics 166, 1981–1993.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C. S., Huang J. and Zhang Y. M. 2007 Mapping binary trait loci in the F2:3 design. J. Heredity 98, 337–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C. S. and Zhang R. M. 2007 Efficiency of triple test cross for detecting epistasis with marker information. Heredity 98, 401–410.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan-Ming Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, C., Zhang, YM. & Guo, Z. Mapping quantitative trait loci for binary trait in the F2:3 design. J Genet 87, 201–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-008-0033-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-008-0033-3

Keywords

  • binary trait
  • F2:3 design
  • liability model
  • maximum likelihood
  • Monte-Carlo simulation
  • penetrance model