Skip to main content
Log in

An integration of geospatial and fuzzy-logic techniques for flood-hazard mapping

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hazard is a natural occurrence that might harm humans, animals or the environment. It may cause loss of life, illness or other health consequences, property damage, social and economic crisis or environmental degradation. Various regions around the world are vulnerable to one or more types of disasters. Flooding is one of the worst environmental catastrophes that impacts both civilisation and the environment globally. Various datasets and methods, such as meteorological data, satellite images and GIS, were used to create the hazard assessment map. For a particular region, flood hazards can be developed by integrating an assessment map for several parameter categories. The aim of the study was to evaluate the hazard of flooding and map the areas that will be flooded in Gujarat. This study develops and tests flood-hazard maps to visualise the spatial variation of hazards in Gujarat, India. The parameters for flood-hazard assessment are mainly considered as elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, lithology, soil, land use/cover, drainage density and distance from the river, and rainfall to create a map in the context of a GIS. The acquired data was evaluated using ArcGIS and fuzzy-logic techniques to build a flood hazard map. Five categories have been assigned to the computed flood hazard map: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Engineers, planners and local governments may find this study useful in the future when it comes to land use planning and the control of hazards. Flood hazard potential mapping is necessary to manage and mitigate flooding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed N, Hoque M A A, Howlader N and Pradhan B 2022 Flood risk assessment: Role of mitigation capacity in spatial flood risk mapping; Geocarto Int. 37(25) 8394–8416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akay H 2021 Flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical fuzzy logic and MCDM methods; Soft Comput. 25(14) 9325–9346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunkaynak A and Bizimana H 2020 Prediction of flood hazard map based on hybrid fuzzy geographic information system and its application for Ayamama watershed; Int. J. Fuzzy Comput. Model. 3(1) 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin M C and Sevgi Birincioğlu E 2022 Flood risk analysis using GIS-based analytical hierarchy process: A case study of Bitlis Province; Appl. Water Sci. 12(6) 122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay N, Bhuiyan C and Saha A K 2016 Heat waves, temperature extremes and their impacts on monsoon rainfall and meteorological drought in Gujarat, India; Nat. Hazards 82(1) 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayal K S, Deo R C and Apan A A 2018 Spatio-temporal drought risk mapping approach and its application in the drought-prone region of south-east Queensland, Australia; Nat. Hazards 93(2) 823–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagos Y G, Andualem T G, Yibeltal M and Mengie M A 2022 Flood hazard assessment and mapping using GIS integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in upper Awash River basin, Ethiopia; Appl. Water Sci. 12(7) 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham B T, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly H B, Gróf G, Ho H L, Hong H, Chapi K and Prakash I 2019 A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods; J. Hydrol. 573 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H X, Nguyen A T, Ngo A T, Phan V T, Nguyen T D, Do V T, Dao D C, Dang D T, Nguyen A T, Nguyen T K and Hens L 2020 A hybrid approach using GIS-based fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS assessing flood hazards along the south-central coast of Vietnam; Appl. Sci. Switzerland 10(20) 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugraha A L, Awaluddin M and Sasmito B 2018 Modelling multi hazard mapping in Semarang city using GIS-fuzzy method; Earth Environ. Sci. 123 012002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsian S, Amani M, Moghimi A, Ghorbanian A and Mahdavi S 2021 Flood hazard mapping using fuzzy logic, analytical hierarchy process and multi-source geospatial datasets; Remote Sens. 13(23) 4761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Gayen A, Panahi M, Rezaie F and Blaschke T 2019 Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran; Sci. Total Environ. 692 556–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyan S, Pourghasemi H R, Bordbar M, Rahmanian S and Clague J J 2021 A multi-hazard map-based flooding, gully erosion, forest fires and earthquakes in Iran; Sci. Rep. 11(1) 14889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiei-Sardooi E, Azareh A, Choubin B, Mosavi A H and Clague J J 2021 Evaluating urban flood risk using hybrid method of TOPSIS and machine learning; Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. (IJDRR) 66 102614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Zeinivand H and Besharat M 2016 Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis; Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 7(3) 1000–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini S Z and Ildoromi A R 2020 Suburban flood hazard mapping in Hamadan city, Iran; Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Munic. Eng. 173(2) 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilodimou H D, Bathrellos G D, Chousianitis K, Youssef A M and Pradhan B 2019 Multi-hazard assessment modelling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: A case study; Environ. Earth Sci. 78 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilodimou H D, Bathrellos G D and Alexakis E 2021 Flood hazard assessment mapping in burned and urban areas; Sustainability 13 4455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez O and Bizimana H 2021 Flood hazard risk evaluation using fuzzy logic and weightage-based combination methods in geographic information system; Sci. Iran 27(2A) 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subedi B, Devkota B and Shrestha B 2023 Flood hazard mapping using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach over the Indrawati River Basin; Jalawaayu 3(1) 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Liu Y, Hu Z, Lyu Y, Zhang G, Liu J and Liu Y et al. 2020 Flood risk assessment based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan area China; Sustainability 12(4) 1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeganeh N and Sabri S 2014 Flood vulnerability assessment in Iskandar Malaysia using multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy logic; Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 8(16) 1794–1806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mausmi Gohil has carried out the work using various techniques and prepared the manuscript. Darshan Mehta has verified the analysis work. Mohamedmaroof Shaikh has compiled the manuscript with proper corrections.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darshan Mehta.

Additional information

Communicated by Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gohil, M., Mehta, D. & Shaikh, M. An integration of geospatial and fuzzy-logic techniques for flood-hazard mapping. J Earth Syst Sci 133, 80 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02288-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02288-1

Keywords

Navigation