Abstract
Understanding annual extraction volumes and fluctuations in groundwater depth is essential in water resource management. This study applied various machine learning methods to predict the spatial variability of groundwater depletion (GWD) in an alluvial aquifer located along the southern coasts of the Caspian Sea (Mazandaran Plain). Initially, mean GWD values were measured from 250 piezometric wells across the plain. Subsequently, the factors controlling GWD were identified and provided. These factors encompass natural elements, including precipitation, evaporation, topography, groundwater depth, aquifer transmissivity, and proximity to water bodies. They also include anthropogenic factors such as extraction rates and proximity to industrial centres. Three machine learning models – Random Forest (RF), Deep Learning (DL), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (EGB) – were employed to model GWD using consistent training and test data. In this context, GWD was used as the output, and its controlling factors were incorporated as input variables. Correlation coefficients between GWD and its controlling factors revealed that the transmissivity of aquifer formations (R = 0.81), groundwater withdrawal within well radii (R = 0.69), and groundwater depth (R = 0.6) were the most significant factors. All three models demonstrated high efficacy during the training and testing stages. However, during testing, EGB offered the highest performance in modelling GWD due to extraction (R2 = 0.8, NSE = 0.82). The verified model was then used to predict annual drawdown or extraction across the plain. The predicted results were visually represented as an annual GWD or extraction map within a GIS framework. A comparison between observed GWD values in piezometric wells and the predicted values confirmed the robust performance of the proposed methodology (R2 = 0.8). This methodology can be employed effectively to predict spatial changes in GWD or annual extraction in other plains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal C C 2018 Neural networks and deep learning; Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-94462-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94463-0.
Alshehri F, Sultan M, Karki S, Alsefry S, Alharbi H, Sahour H and Sturchio N 2020 Mapping the distribution of shallow groundwater occurrences using remote sensing-based statistical modeling over southwest Saudi Arabia; Remote Sens. 12 1361, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091361.
Bear J 1979 Hydraulics of groundwater; Mc GrawHill Inc, New York.
Bierkens M 1998 Modeling water table fluctuations by means of a stochastic differential equation; Water Resour. Res. 34(10) 2485–2499, https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02298.
Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C J and Olshen R A 1984 Classification and regression trees; CRC Press.
Breiman L 2001 Random Forests; Mach. Learn. 45(1) 5–32.
Buyun X, Huifeng Y, Hua B, Bo S and Ruifang M 2023 Spatial variability of free porosity in the groundwater level fluctuation zone in the Baoding Plain area; Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol. 50(3) 23–33, https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202208004
Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S and Tofani V 2013 Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: Sensitivity and scaling issues; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 2815–2831, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013.
Chen W, Li H, Hou E, Wang S, Wang G and Panahi M et al. 2018 GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models; Sci. Total Environ. 634 853–867, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055.
Chen W, Pradhan B, Li S, Shahabi H, Rizaei H, Hou E and Wang S 2019 Novel hybrid integration approach of bagging-based fishers linear discriminate function for groundwater potential analysis; Nat. Resour. Res. 28 1239–1258, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09465-w.
Davoodi Moghaddam D, Rezaei M, Pourghasemi H R, Pourtaghie Z S and Pradhan B 2015 Groundwater spring potential mapping using bivariate statistical model and GIS in the Taleghan watershed, Iran; Arab. J. Geosci. 8(2) 913–929, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1161-5.
Fan J, Wang X, Wu L, Zhou H, Zhang F, Yu X, Lu X and Xiang Y 2018 Comparison of support vector machine and extreme gradient boosting for predicting daily global solar radiation using temperature and precipitation in humid subtropical climates: A case study in China; Energy Convers. Manag. 164 102–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.087.
Gao C, Zhang B, Shao S, Hao M, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Kuang Y, Dong I and Wang Z 2023 Risk assessment and zoning of flood disaster in Wuchengxiyu Region, China; Urban Clim. 49 101562, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101562.
Geng X and Boufadel M C 2017 The influence of evaporation and rainfall on supratidal groundwater dynamics and salinity structure in a sandy beach; Water Resour. Res. 53 6218–6238, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020344.
Gholami V, Aghagoli H and Kaleth M A 2015 Modeling sanitary boundaries of drinking water wells on the Caspian Sea southern coasts, Iran; Environ. Earth Sci. 74(4) 2981–2990, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4329-3.
Gholami V, Torkman J and Dalir P 2019 Simulation of precipitation time series using tree-rings, earlywood vessel features, and artificial neural network; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 137 1939–1948.
Gholami V, Khaleghi M R and Taghvaei E 2020 Groundwater quality modeling using self-organizing map (SOM) and geographic information system (GIS) on the Caspian southern coasts; J. Mount. Sci. 17 1724–1734, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5483-y.
Gholami V and Booij M J 2022 Use of machine learning and geographical information system to predict nitrate concentration in an unconfined aquifer in Iran; J. Cleaner Prod. 360 360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131847.
Gholami V, Jokar E, Azodi M, Zabardast H A and Bashirgonbad M 2009 The influence of anthropogenic activities on intensifying runoff generation and flood hazard in Kasilian watershed; J. Appl. Sci. 9(20) 3723–3730.
Gholami V and Sahour H 2022 Simulation of rainfall-runoff process using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plots data; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 147 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03817-4.
Golian M, Saffarzadeh A, Katibeh H, Mahdad M and Saadat H et al. 2021 Consequences of groundwater overexploitation on land subsidence in Fars Province of Iran and its mitigation management programme; Water Environ. J. 8, https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12688.
Guzy A and Witkowski W T 2021 Land subsidence estimation for groundwater drainage induced by underground mining; Energies 14 4658, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154658.
Huang S, Lyu Y, Sha H and Xiu L 2021 Seismic performance assessment of unsaturated soil slope in different groundwater levels; Landslides 18(8) 2813–2833, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01674-w.
Hayashi M 2020 Alpine hydrogeology: The critical role of groundwater in sourcing the headwaters of the world; Ground Water 58(4) 498–510, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12965.
Hinsby K, de Melo M T C and Dahl M 2008 European case studies supporting the derivation of natural background levels and groundwater threshold values for the protection of dependent ecosystems and human health; Sci. Total Environ. 401(1–3) 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.018.
Hssaisoune M, Bouchaou L, Sifeddine A, Bouimetarhan I and Chehbouni A 2020 Moroccan groundwater resources and evolution with global climate changes; Geosci. 10(2) 81, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020081.
Hu C, Wu Q, Li H, Jian S, Li N and Lou Z 2018 Deep learning with a long short-term memory networks approach for rainfall-runoff simulation; Water 10(11) 1543, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111543.
Jiawei X, Sicheng P, Poly Z S, Seop Hyeong P and Kun G 2022 Human-factors-in-driving-loop: Driver identification and verification via a deep learning approach using psychological behavioral data; IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE-TITS), https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3225782.
Lee S, Hyun Y and Lee M 2019 Groundwater potential mapping using data mining models of big data analysis in Goyang-si, South Korea; Sustainability 11(6) 1678, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061678.
Liu Z, Xu J, Liu M, Yin Z, Liu X, Yin L and Zheng W 2023 Remote sensing and geostatistics in urban water-resource monitoring: A review; Mar. Freshw. Res., https://doi.org/10.1071/MF22167.
Mao R, Zhu H, Zhang L and Chen A 2006 A new method to assist small data set neural network learning. In sixth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications; IEEE 1 17–22.
Mirzaei S, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B and Alavi S J 2021 Flood susceptibility assessment using extreme gradient boosting (EGB), Iran; Earth Sci. Inf. 14 51–67, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00530-0.
Motevalli A, Naghibi S A, Hashemi H, Berndtsson R, Pradhan B and Gholami V 2019 Inverse method using boosted regression tree and k-nearest neighbor to quantify effects of point and non-point source nitrate pollution in groundwater; J. Cleaner Prod. 228 1248–1263.
Mogaji K A and Lim H S 2018 Application of Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence model to geoelectric and hydraulic parameters for groundwater potential zonation; NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 7(1) 134–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2017.12.008.
Mousavi S M, Golkarian A, Naghibi S A, Kalantari B and Pradhan B 2017 GIS-based groundwater spring potential mapping using data mining boosted regression tree and probabilistic frequency ratio models in Iran; Geosci. 3(1) 91–115, https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2017.1.91.
Naghibi S A, Hashemi H, Berndtsson R and Lee S 2020 Application of extreme gradient boosting and parallel random forest algorithms for assessing groundwater spring potential using DEM-derived factors; J. Hydrol. 589 125197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125197.
Nayak P, Satyaji Rao Y R and Sudheer K P 2006 Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow groundwater using artificial neural network approach; Water Resour. Manag. 20 77–90, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-4007-z.
Nicodemus K K 2011 Letter to the editor: On the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures; Brief Bioinform. 12(4) 369–373, https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbr016.
Nordqvist R, Gustafsson E, Andersson P, Thur P and Giosigma A B 2008 Groundwater flow and hydraulic gradients in fractures and fracture zones at Forsmark and Oskarshamn; SKB Rapport, 69p.
Rahmati O, Naghibi S A, Shahabi H, Bui D T and Pradhan B et al. 2018 Groundwater spring potential modeling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches; J. Hydrol. 565 248–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.027.
Rahmati O, Pourghasemi H R and Melesse A M 2016 Application of GIS-based data-driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: A case study at Mehran Region, Iran; Catena 137 360–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.010.
Reghunath R, Murthy T R and Raghavan B R 2005 Time series analysis to monitor and assess water resources: A moving average approach; Environ. Monit. Assess. 109 65–72, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-5838-4.
Panahi G H, Eskafi H M, Faridhosseini A, Khodashenas S R and Rohani A 2023 Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations under climate change based on machine learning algorithms in the Mashhad aquifer, Iran; J. Water Clim. Change 14(3) 1039–1059, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.027.
Sahour S, Khanbeyki M, Gholami V, Sahour H, Kahvazade I and Karimi H 2023 Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(16) 46,004–46,021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25596-3.
Sahour H, Gholami V and Vazifedan M 2020 A comparative analysis of statistical and machine learning techniques for mapping the spatial distribution of groundwater salinity in a coastal aquifer; J. Hydrol. 591 125321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125321.
Sahour H, Gholami V, Torkaman J, Vazifedan M and Saeedi S 2021 Random forest and extreme gradient boosting algorithms for streamflow modeling using vessel features and tree-rings; Environ; Earth Sci. 80 1–14.
Sahour H, Sultan M, Abdellatif B, Emil M, Abotalib A Z, Abdelmohsen K, Vazifedan M, Mohammad A T, Hassan S M, Metwalli M R and El Bastawesy M 2022 Identification of shallow groundwater in arid lands using multi-sensor remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms; J. Hydrol. 614 128509.
Shen C 2018 A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists; Water Resour. Res. 54(11) 8558–8593, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022643.
Shiati K 1999 World water vision for food: Country case study Iran; Paper presented at the MENA Consultation Meeting, May 1999, Bari, Italy.
Shiri N, Shiri J, Yaseen Z M, Kim S, Chung I M, Nourani V and Zounemat-Kermani M 2021 Development of artificial intelligence models for well groundwater quality simulation: Different modeling scenarios; PLOS ONE 16(5) e0251510, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251510.
Smedema L K and Shiati K 2002 Irrigation and salinity: A perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone; Irrig. Drain. 16 161–174, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016008417327.
Sušanj I, Ožanić N and Marović I 2016 Methodology for developing hydrological models based on an artificial neural network to establish an early warning system in small catchments; Adv. Meteorol. 2 9125219, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9125219.
Yin X, Shu L, Wang Z, Lu C and Liu B 2023 Time-frequency analysis of groundwater depth variation based on the ICA-WTC composite method; J. Hydrol. 617 128914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128914.
Wei H F, Ledoux E and De Marsily G 1990 Regional modelling of groundwater flow and salt and environmental tracer transport in deep aquifers in the Paris Basin; J. Hydrol. 120(1–4) 341–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90158-T.
Wu C L and Chau K W 2013 Prediction of rainfall time series using modular soft computing methods; Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(3) 997–1007.
Zhu G, Liu Y, Wang L, Sang L, Zhao K, Zhang Z, Lin X and Qiu D 2023 The isotopes of precipitation have climate change signal in arid Central Asia; Global Planet Change 225 104103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104103.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Regional Water Company of Mazandaran (RWCM), for providing the hydrological and meteorological data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Vahid Gholami, Mohammad Reza Khaleghi and Mehdi Teimouri: Material preparation, data collection, and analysis. Hossein Sahour: Rewrote the manuscript using his experience in the field of geology and groundwater in the revision process.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Riddhi Singh
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gholami, V., Khaleghi, M.R., Teimouri, M. et al. Prediction of annual groundwater depletion: An investigation of natural and anthropogenic influences. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02184-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02184-0