Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring the nearshore currents pattern along the anthropogenically influenced coast of Puducherry

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics of nearshore hydrodynamics has always been difficult due to the practical necessity of deploying an array of sensors to demonstrate the spatial variability of coastal processes. Lagrangian data collection techniques are frequently used to gather valuable information on the complex flow structure along the coast, both spatially and temporally. The present study uses multiple field-measured datasets to investigate the dynamics of nearshore currents along a wave-dominated coastal stretch of Puducherry, located on India's East Coast. The observations were also used to validate the hydrodynamic model. In-situ data collected with Lagrangian GPS drifters during three seasons in 2017 show that wave action and strong seaward winds significantly influence nearshore surface currents. Furthermore, the observation revealed that nearshore currents change direction from north to south due to seasonal variation and are influenced by coastal anthropogenic features. The hydrodynamics computed from a three-dimensional numerical model created with Delft3D agree well with in-situ measurements. After the calibration process, the values of 0.025 and 14 m2/s were found to be the optimal values of bottom friction and eddy viscosity for Lagrangian-based comparison. However, the simulated drogue trajectories revealed some uncertainties due to model input parameters such as grid discretization, bathymetry, boundary condition, and input of ocean circulation outside the surf zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abascal A J, Castanedo S, Medina R, Losada I J and Alvarez-Fanjul E 2009 Application of HF radar currents to oil spill modeling; Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58 238–248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anandabaskaran V and Vijayakumar G 2017 Studies on morphological changes of Puducherry coast – A review; Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 6(8) 424–427, https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV6IS080216.

  • Anoop T R, Kumar V S and Glejin J 2014 A study on reflection pattern of swells from the shoreline of peninsular India; Nat. Hazards 74 1863–1879, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1282-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun Kumar S V V, Kumar V A, Luhar R K, Sharma R and Kumar R 2020 Design and development of a low-cost GNSS drifter for rip currents; Curr. Sci. 118(2) 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun Kumar S V V, Sivaiah B, Venkateswarlu C, Gireesh B and Sridevi T 2021 Investigation of rip current processes along Visakhapatnam beaches, east coast of India: A study based on GNSS drifters and dye experiments; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 130 72, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01579-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji R and Satheeshkumar J 2021 Numerical modeling of flooding and salinity intrusion along River Ambica, Gujarat; Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Ocean Eng. (ICOE2019). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 106 Springer, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8506-7_17.

  • Balaji R, Ramana Murthy M V and Satheeshkumar J 2019 Measurement of surf zone hydrodynamics along the coastline of Pondicherry, India; Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Ocean Eng. (ICOE2018). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 23 Springer, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3134-3_3.

  • Booij N, Ris R and Holthuijsen L H 1999 A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104(C4) 7649–7666, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622.

  • Chien H, Cheng H Y and Zhong Y 2017 Validating of coherent-on-receive marine radar in nearshore using drifter cluster; Proc. OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen, Aberdeen 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2017.8084883.

  • Clarke L B, Ackerman D and Largier J 2007 Dye dispersion in the surf zone: Measurements and simple models; Cont. Shelf Res. 27 650–669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dora S, Khedekar R and Aparna S G 2020 Trajectories of three drifters deployed simultaneously in the northeastern Arabian Sea; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 129 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1292-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhn F, von Kameke A, Allen-Perkins S, Montero P, Venancio A and Perez-Munuzuri V 2012 Horizontal Lagrangian transport in a tidal-driven estuary – Transport barriers attached to prominent coastal boundaries; Cont. Shelf Res. 39 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jena B K, Chandramohan P and Sanil Kumar V 2001 Longshore transport based on directional waves along north Tamilnadu Coast, India; J. Coast. Res. 17(2) 322–327, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4300182.

  • Johnson D and Pattiaratchi C 2004 Transient rip currents and nearshore circulation on a swell-dominated beach; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 109(C2) 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Stocker R, Head R, Imberger J and Pattiaratchi C 2003 A compact, low-cost GPS drifter for use in the Oceanic nearshore zone, lakes, and estuaries; J. Atmos. Ocean Technol. 20 1880–1884, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020%3C1880:ACLGDF%3E2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankara R S, Ramana Murthy M V and Rajeevan M 2018 National assessment of shoreline changes along Indian coast – A status report for 1990–2016; NCCR Publication.

  • Kumar S S and Balaji R 2015 Effect of bottom friction on tidal hydrodynamics along Gulf of Khambhat, India; Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 154 129–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kim D H, Lee S and Lee J L 2016 Lagrangian observation of rip currents at Haeundae Beach using an optimal buoy type GPS drifter; J. Coast. Res. 75(sp1) 1177–1181, https://doi.org/10.2112/SI75-236.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser G R, Roelvink J A, van Kester T M and Stelling G S 2004 Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model; Coast. Eng. 51 883–915, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.07.014.

  • MacMahan J, Thornton E and Reniers A 2006 Rip current review; Coast. Eng. 53 191–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahan J, Brown J and Thornton E 2009 Low-cost handheld Global Positioning System for measuring surf-zone currents; J. Coast. Res. 25 744–754, https://doi.org/10.2112/08-1000.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahan J, Brown J, Brown J, Thornton E, Reniers A, Stanton T, Henriquez M, Gallagher E, Morrison J, Austin M J, Scott T M and Senechal N 2010 Mean Lagrangian flow behavior on an open coast rip-channeled beach: A new perspective; Mar. Geol. 268 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2009.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani N, Suara K, Fairweather H, Brown R, McCallum A and Sidle R C 2020 Improving the accuracy of hydrodynamic model predictions using Lagrangian calibration; Water 12(2) 575, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molcard A, Poje A C and Özgökmen T M 2006 Directed drifter launch strategies for Lagrangian data assimilation using hyperbolic trajectories; Ocean Model 12 268–289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy M V R, Ravichandran V, Vendhan M, Raju K A A, Avula S K, Varthini A K S and Abhishek T 2020 Shore protection measures along Indian Coast – Design to implementation based on two case studies; Curr. Sci. 118(11) 1769–1773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan B, Niraj P S and Satheeshkumar J 2019 Input reduction and acceleration techniques in a morphodynamic modeling: A case study of Mumbai harbour; Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 31 100765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100765.

  • Ris R, Holthuijsen L and Booij N 1999 A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 2. Verification; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104(C4) 7667–7681, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JC900123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhya K G, Nair T B, Bhaskaran P K, Sabique L N and Jeykumar A K 2014 Wave forecasting system for operational use and its validation at coastal Puducherry, east coast of India; Ocean Eng. 80 64–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.01.009.

  • Satheeshkumar J and Balaji R 2015 Inter-comparison of hydrodynamic models of Gulf of Khambhat; Int. J. Ocean Climate Syst. 6(1) 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satheeshkumar J and Balaji R 2021 Field measurement and modeling of sediment transport along a Sandy Pocket Beach, central west coast of India; J. Waterw. Port Coast Ocean Eng. 147(6) 05021014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000678.

  • Schmidt W E, Woodward B T, Millikan K S, Guza R T, Raubenheimer B and Elgar S 2003 A GPS-tracked surf zone drifter; J. Atmos. Ocean Technol. 20(7) 1069–1075, https://doi.org/10.1175/1460.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W, Holland K T and Guza R T 2005 Surf zone drifters: Applications and observations; Proc. IEEE/OES Eighth Working Conf. on Current Meas. Tech., pp. 106–110.

  • Scott T, Masselink G, Austin J and Russell P 2014 Controls on macrotidal rip current circulation and hazard; Geomorphology 214 198–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard F P and Inman D L 1950 Nearshore water circulation related to bottom topography and wave refraction; Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 31(2) 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard F P, Emery K O and La Fond E C 1941 Rip currents: A process of geological importance; J. Geol. 49(4) 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirisha P, Remya P G, Modi A, Tripathy R R, Nair T M B and Rao B V 2019 Evaluation of the impact of high-resolution winds on the coastal waves; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 128 226, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1247-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spydell M, Feddersen F, Guza R T and Schmidt W E 2007 Observing surf zone dispersion with drifters; J. Phys. Oceanogr. 37(12) 2920–2939, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3580.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spydell M S, Feddersen F, Olabarrieta M, Chen J, Guza R T, Raubenheimer B and Elgar S 2015 Observed and modeled drifters at a tidal inlet; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120 4825–4844, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas C V, Venkatesan R, Somayaji K M and Singh A B 2006 A numerical study of sea breeze circulation observed at a tropical site Kalpakkam on the east coast of India, under different synoptic flow situations; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 115 557–574, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan R, Zacharia S, Gowthaman V, Sudhakar T and Atmanand M A 2020 Ocean current mapping with indigenous drifting buoys; Curr. Sci. 118(11) 1778–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suara K, Wang C, Feng Y, Brown R J, Chanson H and Borgas M 2015 High-resolution GNSS-tracked drifter for studying surface dispersion in shallow water; J. Atmos. Ocean Technol. 32 579–590, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00127.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suara K A, Wang H, Chanson H, Gibbes B and Brown R J 2018 Response of GPS-tracked drifters to wind and water currents in a tidal estuary; IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 44 1077–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vikranth T, Krishna R, Srinivasan R and Sudhakar T 2019 A study on rip current behaviour in coastal Andhra Pradesh with real time surface drifter; Proc. Int. Symposium on Advanced in Coastal Research Special Reference to Indo-Pacific-2019, 17–19 Dec 2019, Chennai.

  • Vikranth T, Srinivasan R, Sudhakar T and Ramakrishna S S V S 2020 Design and development shallow water surface drifter to study rip current behavior at coastal Andhra Pradesh in real time; Global Oceans 2020: Singapore – U.S. Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA 2020 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WL | Delft Hydraulics 2006 Delft3D-FLOW User Manual.

  • Zhong Y 2019 Observation of mixing and dispersion characteristics in inner shelf and estuary; PhD dissertation, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

  • Zhong Y Z, Chien H, Cheng H, Chang Y C and Balaji R 2016 Development of low-cost drifters array for nearshore current mapping in coastal groin effect basins; 12th Int. Conf. Hydrosci. Eng. Environ. Res., pp. 373–377.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof Hwa Chien of Taiwan's National Central University for providing GPS drifters and technical assistance during field measurement campaigns and analyses. The National Center for Coastal Research (NCCR) and the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) are acknowledged for their assistance with field experiments and sharing tide, current, and wave datasets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SJ: Field data collection, numerical modelling, analysis and interpretation of results and drafting the original manuscript. BR: Conceptualization of work, supervision of field data collection and numerical modelling, revision of the draft manuscript and overall support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balaji Ramakrishnan.

Additional information

Communicated by P A Francis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeyaraj, S., Ramakrishnan, B. Monitoring the nearshore currents pattern along the anthropogenically influenced coast of Puducherry. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 163 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02179-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02179-x

Keywords

Navigation