Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of water resources availability (WRA) using gridded evapotranspiration data: A simpler alternative to Central Water Commission’s WRA assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Central Water Commission (CWC) revised its estimates of water resources availability (WRA) for river basins of India in June 2019 (CWC19). Despite more than six years of modelling effort, several major drawbacks remain – the model needs extensive inputs on water management and seasonal crop growth; model calibration is cumbersome and not very effective; and, it cannot be easily extended to other years or ungauged basins. This paper proposes a conceptually equivalent, but simpler, alternative to estimate WRA using evapotranspiration (ET) products based on remote sensing or land surface models (ETRS). In this approach, WRA is formulated in terms of ET and necessary assumptions are made to account for ET from irrigated areas. The proposed alternative does not involve any modelling, does not require any inputs on water management or crop growth, and is applicable even in ungauged basins. The analysis presented here has two main parts. In the first part, since ETRS products are prone to systematic biases they are evaluated for their validity against basin-scale proxy observations of ET. In the second part, the validated ETRS products are used to estimate WRA using the proposed approach. Over Godavari and Krishna river basins of peninsular India, and also 15 sub-basins within these two basins, five state-of-the-art ETRS products (ERA5-Land, GLEAM, NTSG/MOD16, NTSG/PLSH and FEWS/SSEBop) are evaluated. At a basin-scale two of these products, ERA5 and SSEBop, are found to have limited bias and reasonably captured annual basin-scale ET. Using these two products, WRA is estimated for the two basins and their 15 sub-basins. Resulting WRA estimates are found to be similar to, and highly consistent with, those from CWC19. Potential causes of discrepancies in WRA between CWC19 and this study are discussed, drawbacks of this approach and potential improvements, and next steps in expanding this work to other river basins of India are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CWC 2018 Hydrological Year Books for the Year 2017–18; http://cwc.gov.in/sites/default/files/admin/10BGBWYB17-18.pdf, http://cwc.gov.in/sites/default/files/admin/10AKBWYB17-18.pdf.

  • CWC 2019 Reassessment of Water Availability in India using Space Inputs, Central Water Commission, Basin Planning and Management Organisation; http://www.cwc.gov.in/water-resource-estimation.

  • Goroshi S, Pradhan R, Singh R P, Singh K and Parihar J S 2017 Trend analysis of evapotranspiration over India: Observed from long-term satellite measurements; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 126(8) 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobeichi S, Abramowitz G and Evans J P 2021 Robust historical evapotranspiration trends across climate regimes; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25(7) 3855–3874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hora T, Srinivasan V and Basu N B 2019 The groundwater recovery paradox in South India; Geophys. Res. Lett. 46(16) 9602–9611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadian M, Behrangi A, Smith W K and Fisher J B 2020 Global trends in evapotranspiration dominated by increases across large cropland regions; Remote Sens. 12(7) 1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi P and Bastiaanssen W G 2015 Spatial evapotranspiration, rainfall and land use data in water accounting–part 1: Review of the accuracy of the remote sensing data; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19(1) 507–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi P, Bastiaanssen W G and Molden D 2013 Water accounting plus (WA+) – a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17(7) 2459–2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan R, Sanjay J, Gnanaseelan C, Mujumdar M, Kulkarni A and Chakraborty S 2020 Assessment of climate change over the Indian region: A report of the ministry of earth sciences (MOES), Government of India; Springer Nature, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-15-4327-2.

  • Lehner B and Doll P 2004 Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands; J. Hydrol. 296(1–4) 1–22, https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/global-lakes-and-wetlands-database-lakes-and-wetlands-grid-level-3.

  • Lehner B and Grill G 2013 Global river hydrography and network routing: Baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems; Hydrol. Process. 27(15) 2171–2186, https://www.hydrosheds.org/.

  • Madhusoodhanan C, Sreeja K and Eldho T 2017 Assessment of uncertainties in global land cover products for hydro-climate modeling in India; Water Resour. Res. 53(2) 1713–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahto S S and Mishra V 2019 Does ERA-5 outperform other reanalysis products for hydrologic applications in India?; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124(16) 9423–9441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens B, Miralles D G, Lievens H, Schalie R v d, De Jeu R A, Fernandez-Prieto D, Beck H E, Dorigo W A and Verhoest N E 2017 Gleam v3: Satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture; Geosci. Model Dev. 10(5) 1903–1925.

  • McNamara I, Baez-Villanueva O M, Zomorodian A, Ayyad S, Zambrano-Bigiarini M, Zaroug M, Mersha A, Nauditt A, Mbuliro M and Wamala S et al. 2021 How well do gridded precipitation and actual evapotranspiration products represent the key water balance components in the Nile basin?; J. Hydrol. Regional Stud. 37.

  • Miralles D G, Holmes T, De Jeu R, Gash J, Meesters A and Dolman A 2011 Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15(2) 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu Q, Zhao M and Running S W 2011 Improvements to a modis global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm; Remote Sens. Environ. 115(8) 1781–1800, http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/MOD16/MOD16A2_MONTHLY.MERRA_GMAO_1kmALB/GEOTIFF_0.05degree/.

  • Munoz-Sabater J, Dutra E, Agusti-Panareda A, Albergel C, Arduini G and Balsamo G et al. 2021 ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications; Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13(9) 4349–4383.

  • NRSC 2007 National land use and land cover mapping using multi-temporal Awifs data, second cycle report, 2005–06; Bhuvan Thematic Services, https://bhuvan-app1.nrsc.gov.in/2dresources/bhuvanstore.php.

  • Pai D, Sridhar L, Rajeevan M, Sreejith O, Satbhai N and Mukhopadhyay B 2014 Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25 × 0.25) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region; Mausam 65(1) 1–18, https://imdpune.gov.in/Clim_Pred_LRF_New/Grided_Data_Download.html.

  • Ranade A, Singh N, Singh H and Sontakke N 2008 On variability of hydrological wet season, seasonal rainfall and rainwater potential of the river basins of India (1813–2006); J. Hydrol. Res. Dev. 23 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao K D, Rao V V, Dadhwal V, Sharma J and Jyothsna R 2014 Transforming to hydrological modelling approach for long-term water resources assessment under climate change scenario–a case study of the Godavari basin, India; Curr. Sci. 106(2) 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodell M, Velicogna I and Famiglietti J S 2009 Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India; Nature 460(7258) 999–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadore E, Mul M, Tran B and Karimi P 2020 Water accounting study for three sub-basins of the Krishna water system in Karnataka, India; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands, https://www.wateraccounting.org/projects/adb.html.

  • Senay G B, Kagone S and Velpuri N M 2020 Operational global actual evapotranspiration: Development, evaluation, and dissemination; Sensors 20(7) 1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah M, Vijayshankar P and Harris F 2021 Water and agricultural transformation in India: A symbiotic relationship-I; Econ. Polit. Wkly 56(29).

  • Singh R, Mishra V, Narasimhan B, Ghosh S, Sharma A, Dutta S and Mujumdar P 2020 Hydrological modeling in India; Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 86 479–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite C W and Mather J R 1957 Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance; Technical report, Centerton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerasinghe I, Bastiaanssen W, Mul M, Jia L and Griensven A V 2020 Can we trust remote sensing evapotranspiration products over Africa? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24(3) 1565–1586.

  • Westenbroek S M, Engott J A, Kelson V A and Hunt R J 2018 Swb version 2.0 – a soil-water-balance code for estimating net infiltration and other water-budget components; US Geological Survey, https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/tm6A59.

  • Zhang K, Kimball J S, Nemani R R and Running S W 2010 A continuous satellite-derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983 to 2006; Water Resour. Res. 46(9), http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/ET_global_monthly/Global_8kmResolution/.

  • Zhang K, Kimball J S and Running S W 2016a A review of remote sensing based actual evapotranspiration estimation; Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water 3(6) 834–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Pena-Arancibia J L, McVicar T R, Chiew F H, Vaze J, Liu C, Lu X, Zheng H and Wang Y et al. 2016b Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components; Sci. Rep. 6(1) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their help in making this manuscript better. A number of publicly available datasets are used in this study and are cited wherever applicable. National boundaries are obtained from Survey of India and are shown for spatial reference only. Software used in this analysis includes the R statistical computing and graphics software for data analysis (https://www.r-project.org/), QGIS for GIS analysis (https://qgis.org/en/site/), and Open Office for spreadsheet compilation (https://www.openoffice.org/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All analyses presented here were performed by the author of this paper using only his personal computer and publicly available resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopi Goteti.

Additional information

Communicated by Riddhi Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goteti, G. Estimation of water resources availability (WRA) using gridded evapotranspiration data: A simpler alternative to Central Water Commission’s WRA assessment. J Earth Syst Sci 131, 225 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-01956-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-01956-4

Keywords

Navigation