Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tectonic evolution of Nellore Schist Belt along the southeastern margin of Eastern Dharwar Craton, South India: A critical study with a geological and geophysical approach

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Nellore Schist Belt (NSB) along the southeastern margin of Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC) is similar to all other Late Archaean greenstone belts of EDC. The NSB of EDC is bounded by Proterozoic Cuddapah sediments including the deformed and metamorphosed Mesoproterozoic Nallamalai Fold Belt (NFB) in the west; and high-grade Palaeo- to Mesoproterozoic Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) towards further east. Two parallel Western and Eastern arms of different environmental facies of NSB found to be evolved in foreland and back-arc/continental-arc basinal setups, respectively. An initial Late Archaean subducting coupled with the east to west convergence mechanism with regards to evolution of the NSB is discussed in detail. Based on gravity and seismic studies, an elliptical gravity high over the Eastern arm and with its gradual decrease in intensity towards the Western arm indicates the presence of a high-density layer over the Eastern arm of NSB with its continuity and wedging out below the Western arm defines the subducting and convergence mechanism from east to west in concurrence with several established studies. Accordingly, the NSB is differentiated as one continuous single segment, i.e., Late Archaean in contrary to earlier views. The steep gravity gradient in the west defines the Cuddapah Eastern Marginal Thrust, which separates the NFB in the west and NSB in the east. A similar gravity gradient is differentiated as low-angle Malakondasatram Thrust corroborating with the geological features in the eastern part, which defines the eastern limit of EDC. In the NSB domain of Kanigiri–Pamuru area, an isolated structurally controlled Mesoproterozoic metasedimentary unit is established unconformably overlying both Western and Eastern arms of the NSB. This unit is transformed as high-grade kyanite schist in the Vinjamuru domain of extreme eastern part at the EGMB front. The occurrence of Mesoproterozoic high-grade schist over the low-grade schist of NSB is interpreted as a post-dated overprint with composition and layer specific metamorphism in response to the Proterozoic tectono-thermal events of Easternghat orogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babu V R R M 1998 The Nellore Schist Belt: An Archaean greenstone belt, Andhra Pradesh, India; Gondwana Res. Group Memoir 4 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu V R R M 2001 Plate tectonic history of The Indian plate Nellore–Khammam Schist belt; Indian Academy of Geoscience, Geology Department, Osmania University, 183p.

  • Bhattacharya H N, Bhattacharya B, Pal S and Roy A 2015 Late Archaean tidalites from western margin of Chitradurga greenstone belt, southern India; Precamb. Res. 257 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burhanuddin M 2017 Deformed Mesoproterozoic Pakhal sequence in south-eastern Pranhitha–Godavari basin along eastern margin of Eastern Dharwar Craton: Interpreted as an outcome of Easternghat orogeny during India-east Antarctica amalgamation; Indian J. Geosci. 70–71 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burhanuddin M, Chandrashekhraih K C, Laxmana B K and Manjunatha 1990 Geology of central part of Chitradurga Schist Belt, Chitradurga district, Karnataka; Unpublished Geol. Surv. Ind. Report.

  • Burhanuddin M and Mohakul J P 2020 Litho-stratigraphic analysis of Dharwar Supergroup in Chitradurga schist belt, Karnataka: A re-appraisal; Indian J. Geosci. 74 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burhanuddin M and Ravi Kumar B 2019 A mesoproterozoic clastic metasedimentary sequence occurrence over the Nellore schist belt, beyond the limit of Cuddapah eastern margin thrust and at the Easternghat front: A critical study from eastern margin of eastern Dharwar Craton; Indian J. Geosci. 74 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick B, Vasudev V N and Hegde G V 2000 The Dharwar Craton, southern India, interpreted as the result of late Archaean oblique convergence; Precamb. Res. 99 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick B, Vasudev V N, Krishna Rao B and Hegde G V 1991 The stratigraphy and structure of the Dharwar super-group adjacent to the Honnali dome: Implications for Late Archaean basin development and regional structure in the western part of Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. India 38 457–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick B, Vasudev V N, Krishna Rao B and Hegde G V 1992 The Dharwar supergroup: Basin development and implications for Late Archaean tectonic setting in western Karnataka; Southern India Univ. Western Australia Publ. 22 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrakala K, Pandey O P, Sesha Sai V V, Vasanthi A and Satish Kumar K 2017 Seismically derived Gondwana and Proterozoic sediments east of Cuddapah basin, south Indian shield and its possible geotectonic implications; Pure Appl. Geophys. 174 2601–2619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar E, Ramesh D and Biswal T K 2018 Magnetotelluric evidence on the southward extension of the Eastern Ghats mobile belt from Ongole India; J. Asian Earth Sci. 164 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloos M 1982 Flow melanges: Numerical modeling and geological constraints on their origin in the Franciscan subduction complex, California; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 93 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S and Sengupta P 2003 Indo-Antarctic correlation: A perspective from the Eastern Ghats granulite belt, India; In: Proterozoic east Gondwana: Supercontinent assembly and breakup (eds) Yoshida M, Windley B F and Dasgupta S, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 206 131–143.

  • Dharma Rao C V, Santosh M and Yuan-Dao W 2011 Mesoproterozoic ophiolite mélange from SE periphery of the Indian plate; U–Pb zircon ages and tectonic implications; Gondwana Res. 19 384–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobmeier C, Lukte S, Hammerschmidt H and Mezger K 2006 Emplacement and deformation of the Vinukonda granite-implications for the geological evolution of peninsular India and for Rodinia reconstructions; Precamb. Res. 146 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobmeier C J and Raith M M 2003 Crustal architecture and evolution of the Eastern Ghat belt and adjacent regions of India; In: Proterozoic east Gondwana: Supercontinent assembly and breakup (eds) Yoshida M, Windley B F and Dasgupta S. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 206 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geological Survey of India 1972 57N Nellore Quadrangle Geological map.

  • Geological Survey of India 1990 57M Kandukuru Quadrangle Geological map.

  • GSI-NGRI 2006 Gravity Map Series of India.

  • Gupta J N, Pandey B K, Chabria T, Benerjee D C and Jayaram K M V 1984 Rb–Sr geochronological studies on the granites of Vinukonda and Kanigiri, Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh, India; Precamb. Res. 26(2) 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson B, Collins A, Paye J, Forbes C and Saha D 2014 Geologically constraining India in Columbia: The age, isotopic provenance and geochemistry of the protoliths of the Ongole domain, southern Eastern Ghats, India; Gondwana Res. 26 888–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayananda M, Peucat J J, Chardon D, Krishna Rao B, Fanning C M and Corfu F 2013 Neoarchean greenstone volcanism and continental growth, Dharwar Craton, southern India. Constrains from SIMS U–Pb zircon geochronology and Nd isotopes; Precamb. Res. 227 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila K L, Chowdhury R K, Reddy P R, Krishna V G, Narain H, Subbotin S I, Sollogub V B, Chekunov A V, Kharetchko G E, Lazarenko M A and Ilchenko T V 1979 Crustal structure along Kavali–Udipi profile in the Indian peninsular shield from deep seismic sounding; J. Geol. Soc. India 20 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila K L, Tewari H C, Roy Chowdhury K, Rao V K, Sridhar A R and Mall D M 1987 Crustal structure of the northern part of the Proterozoic Cuddapah basin of India from deep seismic soundings and gravity data; Tectonophys. 140 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Brahmam N 1989 Gravity and seismicity of the Cuddapah basin and surrounding places; J. Geol. Soc. India 34 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogsted E J, Balakrishnan D, Mukhopadhyay D K, Rajamani V and Hanson G N 1989 Plate tectonics 2.5 billion years ago: Evidence at Kolar, south India; Science 243 1337–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leelanandam C 1989 Prakasam alkaline province in A.P.; J. Geol. Soc. India 53 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leelanandam C 1990 The Kandra volcanics in Andhra Pradesh, possible ophiolites; Curr. Sci. 59 785–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leelanandam C, Burke K, Ashwal L D and Webb S J 2006 Proterozoic mountain building in peninsular India: An analysis based primarily on alkaline rock distribution; Geol. Mag. 143 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra D C, Babu Rao V, Lakshman G, Rao M B S V and Venkata Rayudu Y 1987 Three-dimensional structural model of Cuddapah basin and adjacent eastern part from geophysical studies; In: Purana basins of peninsular India (ed.) Radhakrishna B P, J. Geol. Soc. India Mem. 6 313–330.

  • Mishra D C and Ravi Kumar M 2014 Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constrains; Geosci. Front. 5 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeen S 1998 P-T estimates from the Nellore Schist Belt (India) and evidence for superimposed metamorphic events; Geol. J. 33 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay D and Basak K 2009 Eastern Ghat belt-polycyclic granulite terrane; J. Geol. Soc. India 73 489–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja Rao B K, Rajurkar S T, Ramalinga Swamy G and Ravindra Babu B 1987 Stratigraphy and structure and evolution of the Cuddapah basin; In: Purana basins of peninsular India (ed.) Radhakrishna B P, Geol. Soc. Indian Memoir 6 33–86.

  • Nagaraju J and Chetty T R K 2014 Imprints of tectonics and magmatism in the southern part of the Indian shield: Satellite image interpretation; J. Indian Geophys. Union. 18 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi S M and Rogers J J W 1987 Precambrian geology of India; Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okudaira T, Hari Prasad B and Rajneesh K 2000 Proterozoic evolution of Nellore, Khammam Schist belts in the Khammam district, SE India; J. Geosci. Osaka City Univ. 43 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshy M N, Krishna Brahman N, Aravamadhu P S and Naqvi S M 1968 Role of granitic intrusion in reducing the density of the crust and other related problems as illustrated from a gravity study of the Cuddapah basin, India; Proc. Geol. Soc. Abstr. 304 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna B P and Ramakrishnan M 1988 Archaean-Proterozoic boundary in India; J. Geol. Soc. India 32 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan M, Nanda J K and Augustine P F 1998 Geological evolution of the Proterozoic Eastern Ghats mobile belt; Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ. 44 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan M and Vaidyanathan R 2008 Geology of India. Vol. 1; Geol. Soc. Ind., Bangalore, 556p.

  • Ramam P K and Murthy V N 1997 Geology of Andhra Pradesh; Geol. Soc. Ind., Bangalore, 245p.

  • Ravikant V 2010 Palaeoproterozoic (~1.9 Ga) extension and breakup along the eastern margin of eastern Dharwar Craton, SE India: New Sm–Nd isochrone age constraints from anorogenic mafic magmatism in the Neoarchaean Nellore greenstone belt; J. Asian Earth Sci. 37 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha D 2011 Dismembered ophiolites in Paleoproterozoic Nappe complexes of Kandra and Gurramkonda, south India; J. Asian Earth Sci. 42 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha D, Nandi P, Mazumder R and Kar R 2015 Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Nellore Schist belt, Southern India, since the Neoarchean, and tectonic context; Geol. Soc. Lond. Memoir 43 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sesha Sai V V 2009 Sheeted dykes in Khandra ophiolite complex, Nellore schist belt, Andhra Pradesh-vestiges of Precambrian oceanic crust; J. Geol. Soc. India 74 509–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sesha Sai V V 2013 Proterozoic granite magmatism along the terrane boundary tectonic zone to the east of Cuddapah basin, Andhra Pradesh–Petrotectonic implications for Precambrian crustal growth in Nellore Schist Belt, in associated granites; J. Geol. Soc. India 81 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A P and Mishra D C 2002 Tectono sedimentary evolution of Cuddapah basin and Eastern Ghats mobile belt (India) as Proterozoic collision: Gravity, seismic and geodynamic constraints; J. Geodyn. 33 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreeramachandra Rao K, Srinivasan K N, Krishnappa T K, Katti P M, Roop Kumar D and Seshaiah K 1997 Classification of rocks of Nellore Schist Belt, and associated granites. Abstract, Proc. National Seminar on Nellore Schist Belt. Osmania University, Hyderabad, pp. 177–179.

  • Srikantia S V and Bose S 1985 Archaean Komatiites from Banasandra area of Kibbanahalli arm of Chitradurga supracrustal belt in Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. India 26 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan K N and Roop Kumar D 1995 Geological map of Nellore Schist Belt and adjoining areas, A.P., India; Unpublished progress report of Geological Survey of India for F.S. 1992–93.

  • Upadhyay D 2008 Alkaline magmatism along south-eastern margin of Indian shield: Implication for regional geodynamics and constraints on craton–Eastern Ghats belt suturing; Precamb. Res. 162 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan D and Rao T M 1975 The high grade schistose rocks of Nellore schist belt, Andhra Pradesh and their geological evolution; Indian Mineral. 16 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers J J 2009 Palinspatic (pre-rift and -drift) fit of India and conjugate Antarctica and geological connections across the suture; Gondwana Res. 16 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaya Kumar K, Ernst W G, Leelanandam C, Wooden J L and Grove M J 2010 First Paleoproterozoic ophiolite from Gondwana: geochronologic-geochemical documentation of ancient oceanic crust from Kandra, SE India; Tectonophys. 487 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaya Kumar K and Leelanandam C 2008 Evolution of the Eastern Ghats belt, India: A plate tectonic perspective; J. Geol. Soc. India 72 720–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windley B F 1995 The evolving continents; 3rd edn, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellur D D and Nair R S 1978 Assigning a magmatically defined tectonic environment to Chitradurga Metabasalts, India, by geochemical methods; Precamb. Res. 7 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is an outcome due to first author’s involvement as mapper, researcher and as faculty in the training programmes of Geological Survey of India in allied domains for longer periods. A number of critical discussions and suggestions with many friends and colleagues have made it possible in taking-up of this research work. The help rendered by many young colleagues of GSI is highly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M Burhanuddin: Conceptualising the research work, geological data generation, interpretation, integration and manuscript preparation. B Ravi Kumar: Literature collection, geophysical data processing, interpretation, integration and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Burhanuddin.

Additional information

Communicated by N V Chalapathi Rao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burhanuddin, M., Kumar, B.R. Tectonic evolution of Nellore Schist Belt along the southeastern margin of Eastern Dharwar Craton, South India: A critical study with a geological and geophysical approach. J Earth Syst Sci 131, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01753-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01753-5

Keywords

Navigation