Skip to main content

Role of site effect for the evaluation of attenuation characteristics of P, S and coda waves in Kinnaur region, NW Himalaya

Journal of Earth System Science volume 129, Article number: 191 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

The site effect and attenuation studies are carried out for Kinnaur region of northwest Himalaya, India. A total of 109 local events happened in Kinnaur region of magnitude range 1.6–4.5, are utilized for present work. The earthquake records are influenced by the site effect depending on soft sediment thickness beneath the recording sites. Therefore, in the present study, records are corrected for site effects to estimate P (Qp), S (Qs) and coda (Qc) wave quality factor. The regional frequency dependent attenuation relations, i.e., \( Q_{p} \left( f \right) = \left( {29 \pm 1} \right)f^{(1.01 \pm 0.05)} \), \( Q_{s} \left( f \right) = \left( {38 \pm 5} \right)f^{(1.1 \pm 0.06)} \) and \( Q_{c} \left( f \right) = \left( {74 \pm 11} \right)f^{(1.17 \pm 0.01)} \) are established for the Kinnaur region. The Kinnaur Himalaya mainly belongs to Higher Himalaya Crystalline (HHC) and Tethys Himalaya, where these two geological units are differentiated by the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS). The resonance frequencies and attenuation characteristics are estimated for both regions, i.e., HHC and Tethys Himalaya. A comparison is made between HHC and Tethys Himalaya in the form of resonance frequencies and attenuation properties. The low value resonance frequency and high rate of attenuation towards the northern side of STDS, i.e., Tethys Himalaya support the presence of low-grade metasedimentary rocks. It suggests that Tethys Himalaya has high seismic hazard potential zone compared to HHC.

Research Highlights

  • Site effects have been incorporated to estimate attenuation characteristics of P, S and coda waves in Kinnaur region, NW Himalaya.

  • The regional frequency dependent attenuation relations i.e. Qp(f ) = (29±1)f(1.01±0.05), Qs(f ) = (38±5) f(1.1±0.06) and Qc(f ) = (74±11) f(1.17±0.01) are established for the Kinnaur region.

  • The close resemblance of resonance frequencies with the geology of the study region has been observed.

  • The Tethys Himalaya lies in present study region has high seismic hazard potential zone as compare to Higher Himalaya Crystalline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

References

  • Aki K 1969 Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves; J. Geophys. Res. 74(2) 615–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aki K 1980 Scattering and attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere; J. Geophys. Res. 85 6496–6504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aki K and Chouet B 1975 Origin of coda waves: Source, attenuation and scattering effects; J. Geophys. Res. 80(23) 3322–3342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Srilakshmi K N, Bajaj K, Moustafa S S and Al-Arifi N S 2019 Determination of seismic site classification of seismic recording stations in the Himalayan region using HVSR method; Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 116 304–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj K and Anbazhagan P 2019 Regional stochastic GMPE with available recorded data for active region – Application to the Himalayan region; Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 126 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S and Kumar A 2017 Determination of seismic wave attenuation for the Garhwal Himalayas, India; Geosci. Res. 2(2) 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard P Y and Riepl-Thomas J 2000 Wave propagation in complex geological structures and their effects on strong ground motion; In: Wave Motion in Earthquake Eng., pp. 37–95.

  • Bhargava O N 1972 A reinterpretation of the Krol Belt; Him. Geol. 2 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A R 2008 Basement rocks of the Kumaun–Garhwal Himalaya: Some implications for Himalayan tectonics; J. Earth Sci. India 1 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco F, Castellano M, Del Pezzo E and Ibañez J M 1999 Attenuation of short-period seismic waves at Mt. Vesuvius, Italy; Geophys. J. Int. 138 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright J 1978 Detailed spectral analysis of two small New York State earthquakes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68(4) 1117–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright J, Fletcher J B and Fumal T E 1991 A general inversion scheme for source, site and propagation characteristics using multiply recorded sets of moderate-sized earthquakes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81(5) 1754–1782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore D M 1983 Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on seismological models of radiated Spectra; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73 1865–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K W 2001 Strong motion attenuation relations (Personal Communication).

  • Cooley J W and Tukey J 1965 An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series; Math. Comput. 19(90) 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher J B 1995 Source parameters and crustal Q for four earthquakes in South Carolina; Seismol. Res. Lett. 66 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A 1964 The geology of the Himalayas; Interscience, New York, 289p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S C and Kumar A 2002 Seismic wave attenuation characteristics of three Indian regions: A comparative study; Curr. Sci. 82 407–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley D M and Helmberger D V 1980 Simulation of ground motions; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70 610–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J and Ottemöller L 1999 SEISAN: The Earthquake Analysis Software for Windows, Suns, Solaris and Linux; Institute of Solid Earth Physics, University of Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough S E 1997 Empirical Green’s function analysis: Taking the next step; J. Geophys. Res. 102 5374–5384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough S E and Anderson J G 1988 High-frequency spectra observed at Anza, California: Implications for Q structure; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78(2) 692–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D H, Toksoz M N and Levin F K (eds) 1981 Seismic Wave Attenuation; Society of Exploration Geophysists, Tulsa, Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Kumar P, Mohanty M, Bansal A R, Dimri V P and Chadha R K 2012 Determination of Qβ(f) in different parts of Kumaon Himalaya from the inversion of spectral acceleration data; Pure Appl. Geophys. 169(10) 1821–1845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopoff L 1964 Crustal stresses and seismodynamic characteristics in the upper crust; Rev. Geophys. 2 625–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N and Yadav D N 2019 Coda Q estimation for Kinnaur region and surrounding part of NW Himalaya; J. Seismol. 23(2) 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Arora B R, Mukhopadyay S and Yadav D K 2013 Seismological of clustered seismicity beneath the Kangra–Chamba sector of northwest Himalaya: Constraints from 3D local earthquake tomography; J. Asian Earth Sci. 62 638–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Kumar P, Chauhan V and Hazarika D 2017 Variable anelastic attenuation and site effect in estimating source parameters of various major earthquakes including Mw 7.8 Nepal and Mw 7.5 Hindu Kush earthquake by using far field strong motion data; Int. J. Earth Sci. 106 2371–2386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Mate N and Mukhopadyay S 2014 Estimation of Qp and Qs of Kinnaur Himalaya; J. Seismol. 18(1) 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Parvez I A and Virk H S 2005 Estimation of coda wave attenuation for NW Himalayan region using local earthquakes; Phys. Earth Planet. Intert. 151(3–4) 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Sharma J, Arora B R and Mukhopadhyay S 2009 Seismotectonic model of the Kangra–Chamba sector of northwest Himalaya: Constraints from joint hypocenter determination and focal mechanism, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99(1) 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Joshi A, Sandeep, Kumar A and Chadha R K 2015 Detailed attenuation characteristics of shear waves in Kumaon Himalaya, India using the inversion of strong motion data; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 105(4) 1836–1851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo C H, Wen K L, Hsieh H H, Lin C M, Chang T M and Kuo K W 2012 Site classification and Vs30 estimation of free-field TSMIP stations using the logging data of EGDT; Eng. Geol. 129 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W H K and Lahr J C 1975 Hypo71 (revised): A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion patter of local earthquakes; Open file report, US Geol. Survey, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J and Chávez-García F J 1993 Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83(5) 1574–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzón F, Gil-Zepeda S A, Sánchez-Sesma F J and Ortiz-Alemán C 2004 Three-dimensional simulation of ground motion in the Zafarraya Basin (southern Spain) up to 1.335 Hz under incident plane waves; Geophys. J. Int. 156(3) 584–594.

  • Mittal H and Kumar A 2015 Stochastic finite fault modeling of Mw 5.4 earthquake along Uttarakhand–Nepal Border; Nat. Hazards 75(2) 1145–1166.

  • Mittal H and Kamal K A 2013 Ground motion estimation in Delhi from postulated regional and local earthquakes; J. Seismol. 17(2) 593–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal H, Wu Y M, Chen D Y and Chao W A 2016 Stochastic finite modelling of ground motion for March 5th 2012 Mw 4.6 Earthquake and scenario greater magnitude earthquake in the proximity of Delhi, Nat. Hazards 82(2) 1123–1146.

  • Mukherjee S 2005 Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation of lower-mid crust in continental collisional zones; Curr. Sci. 89 435–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S 2013 Channel flow extrusion model to constrain dynamic viscosity and Prandtl number of the higher Himalayan Shear Zone; Int. J. Earth Sci. 102 1811–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S, Carosi R, Vander Beek P A, Mukherjee B K and Robinson D M 2015 Tectonics of the Himalaya: An introduction; Geol. Soc. London 412 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S and Bormann P 2004 Low cost seismic microzonation using microtremor data: An example from Delhi, India; J. Asian Earth Sci. 24(3) 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Tyagi C and Rai S S 2006 The attenuation mechanism of seismic waves in northwestern Himalayas; Geophys. J. Int. 167(1) 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y 1989 A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface; Railway Technical Research Institute, Quart. Rep. 30(1).

  • Nakata T 1972 Geomorphic history and crustal movement of the foot-hills of the Himalayas; Science Report Tohoku Univ., 7th Series (Geography) 22 39–177.

  • Narayan J P, Sharma M L and Kumar A 2002 A seismological report on the 26 January 2001 Bhuj, India earthquake; Seismol. Res. Lett. 73(3) 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi S S, Paul A and Joshi A 2015 Body wave crustal attenuation characteristics in the Garhwal Himalaya, India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 172(6) 1451–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni J and Barazangi M 1985 Active tectonics of the western Thethyan Himalaya above the underthrusting Indian Plate: The Upper Sutlej river basin as a pull-apart structure; Tectonophys. 112 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parshad R, Snehmani, Kumar P, Srivastva P K and Ganju A 2017 Attenuation of coda waves in Nubra-Siachen Region, Himalaya, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 89 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez I A, Yadav P and Nagaraj K 2012 Attenuation of P, S and coda waves in the NW-Himalayas, India; Int. J. Geosci. 3(1) 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Gupta S C and Pant C C 2003 CODA Q estimates for Kumaun Himalaya; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 112(4) 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato H 1977 Energy propagation including scattering effects single isotropic scattering approximation; J. Phys. Earth 25 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato H and Fehler M 1998 Scattering and attenuation of seismic waves in heterogeneous earth; AIP Press, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekins L C, Wennerberg L, Margheriti L and Liu H P 1996 Site amplification at five locations in San Francisco, California: A comparison of S waves, codas, and microtremors; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86(3) 627–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Teotia S S, Kumar D and Raju P S 2009 Attenuation of P- and S-waves in the Chamoli Region, Himalaya, India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 166(12) 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma V P 1977 Geology of the Kulu–Rampur belt, Himachal Pradesh; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 106 235–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh C, Singh A, Bharathi V S, Bansal A R and Chadha R K 2012 Frequency-dependent body wave attenuation characteristics in the Kumaun Himalaya; Tectonophys. 524 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikantia S V and Sharma R P 1969 Shali Formation – A note on stratigraphic sequence; Geol. Soc. India Bull. 6(3) 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur V C and Tandon S K 1976 Significance of pebble and mineral lineation in the Chamba syncline of Punjab Himalaya, Himachal Pradesh, India, Geol. Mag. 113(2) 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur V C (ed.) 1992 Geology of western Himalaya (Vol. 19), Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya K S 1992 The main boundary thrust zone of the Himalaya, India; Ann. Tectonophys. 6 54–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandana G, Kumar A and Gupta S C 2016 Attenuation characteristics of body-waves for the Bilaspur Region of Himachal Lesser Himalaya; Pure Appl. Geophys. 173(2) 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannay J C, Grasemann B, Rahn M, Frank W, Carter A, Baudraz V and Cosca M 2004 Miocene to Holocene exhumation of metamorphic crustal wedges in the NW Himalaya: Evidence for tectonic extrusion coupled to fluvial erosion; Tectonics 23(1).

  • Virdi N S 1976 Stratigraphy and structure of the area around Nirath, district Simla, Himachal Pradesh; Him. Geol. 6 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto K, Sato H and Ohtake M 1993 Frequency-dependent attenuation of P and S waves in the Kanto area, Japan, based on the coda-normalization method; Geophys. J. Int. 114(1) 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the Director WIHG, Dehradun, for giving permission to publish this work. We are thankful to Dr Sushil Kumar, Group Head, Geophysics Group, WIHG for helping us to achieve the goal. Mr. Chandan Bora and Mr. H C Pandey are thanked for assisting to install the seismic stations and retrieve the continuous seismic data and Mr. Dhirendra Nath Yadav for extracting the earthquake event data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, India

    Richa Kumari, Parveen Kumar & Naresh Kumar

  2. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Richa Kumari &  Sandeep

Authors
  1. Richa Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parveen Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandeep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parveen Kumar.

Additional information

Communicated by Arkoprovo Biswas

Appendices

Appendix

Table A1 The list of the earthquakes used in present work.
Full size table

Author statement

The author RK carried out the data processing, computation of the quality factors, site effects and compilation of results. PK wrote the manuscript and helped in interpretation. NK is involved in the data acquisition from the seismographs installed in the field and helped in data processing and analysis. Sandeep helped in manuscript preparation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, R., Kumar, P., Kumar, N. et al. Role of site effect for the evaluation of attenuation characteristics of P, S and coda waves in Kinnaur region, NW Himalaya. J Earth Syst Sci 129, 191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01454-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01454-5

Keywords

  • Kinnaur Himalaya
  • attenuation
  • quality factor
  • site effect