Advertisement

Accessing the capability of TRMM 3B42 V7 to simulate streamflow during extreme rain events: Case study for a Himalayan River Basin

  • Brijesh Kumar
  • Venkat Lakshmi
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

The paper examines the quality of Tropical Rainfall Monitoring Mission (TRMM) 3B42 V7 precipitation product to simulate the streamflow using Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for various rainfall intensities over the Himalayan region. The SWAT model has been set up for Gandak River Basin with 41 sub-basins and 420 HRUs. Five stream gauge locations are used to simulate the streamflow for a time span of 10 years (2000–2010). Daily streamflow for the simulation period is collected from Central Water Commission (CWC), India and Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM), Nepal. The simulation results are found good in terms of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency \((\hbox {NSE}) {>}0.65\), coefficient of determination \((R^{2}) {>}0.67\) and Percentage Bias \(\hbox {(PBIAS)}{<}15\%\), at each stream gauge sites. Thereafter, we have calculated the PBIAS and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) statistics between TRMM simulated and observed streamflow for various rainfall intensity classes, viz., light (\({<}7.5 \, \hbox {mm}/\hbox {d}\)), moderate (7.5 to 35.4 mm/d), heavy (35.5 to 124.4 mm/d) and extremely heavy (\({>}124.4 \, \hbox {mm}/\hbox {d}\)). The PBIAS and RSR show that TRMM simulated streamflow is suitable for moderate to heavy rainfall intensities. However, it does not perform well for light- and extremely-heavy rainfall intensities. The finding of the present work is useful for the problems related to water resources management, irrigation planning and hazard analysis over the Himalayan regions.

Keywords

SWAT extreme rain events streamflow modelling TRMM Himalayas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to various organizations such as CWC, DHM, GFCC and NASA for providing us the data for the research work. Authors would also like to acknowledge the MHRD Govt. of India for the Ph.D. fellowship to the first author.

References

  1. Abbaspour K C 2015 SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs – a user manual; Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science andTechnology 106,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-1032-4.
  2. Anderson E A 1976 A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover; Energy 114 150.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Srinivasan R, Williams J R, Haney E B and Neitsch S L 2013 Soil & Water Assessment Tool: Input/output documentation; Version 2012, Texas Water Resour. Inst. TR-439 650.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold J G, Moriasi D N, Gassman P W, Abbaspour K C, White M J, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel R D, Griensven A Van, VanLiew M W, Kannan N and Jha M K 2012 SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation; Trans. ASABE 55 1491–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S and Williams J R 1998 Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model development; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajracharya S R, Shrestha M S and Shrestha A B 2014 Assessment of high-resolution satellite rainfall estimation products in a streamflow model for flood prediction in the Bagmati basin, Nepal; J. Flood Risk Manag. 10(1) 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bharti V and Singh C 2015 Evaluation of error in TRMM 3B42V7 precipitation estimates over the Himalayan region; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120 12458–12473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodian A, Dezetter A, Deme A and Diop L 2016 Hydrological evaluation of TRMM rainfall over the upper Senegal River Basin; Hydrology 3 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J J, Liao A, Cao X, Chen L, Chen X, He C, Han G, Peng S, Lu M, Zhang W, Tong X and Mills J 2015 Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: A POK-based operational approach; ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 103 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chow V Te, Maidment D R and Mays LW 2010 Applied Hydrology; Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  11. Dahal R K, Hasegawa S, Masuda T and Yamanaka M 2006 Roadside slope failures in Nepal during torrential rainfall and their mitigation; In: Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides; Universal Academy Press, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, pp. 503–514.Google Scholar
  12. Dile Y T and Srinivasan R 2014 Evaluation of CFSR climate data for hydrologic prediction in data-scarce watersheds: An application in the Blue Nile River Basin; JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 50 1226–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diodato N, Tartari G and Bellocchi G 2010 Geospatial rainfall modelling at eastern Nepalese highland from ground environmental data; Water Resour. Manag. 24 2703–2720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO-UNESCO 1997 Soil map of the world Version 3.6; ISBN 90-6672-057-3, ISRIC Wageningen.Google Scholar
  15. GFCC 2004 Updated comprehensive plan of flood management of Gandak River system; Ganga Flood Control Comm Ministry of Water Resoures, Government of India.Google Scholar
  16. Guo J, Zhai P, Wu L, Cribb M, Li Z, Ma Z, Wang F, Chu D, Wang P and Zhang J 2013 Diurnal variation and the influential factors of precipitation from surface and satellite measurements in Tibet; Int. J. Climatol. 34 2940–2956.Google Scholar
  17. Gupta H V, Sorooshian S and Yapo P O 1999 Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration; J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 135–143.Google Scholar
  18. Hock R 2003 Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas; J. Hydrol. 282 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jain S K, Jain Sanjay K, Jain Neha and Chong-Yu Xu 2017 Hydrologic modeling of a Himalayan mountain basin by using the SWAT model; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss,  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-100.
  20. Jain S K 2015 Assessment of environmental flow requirements for hydropower projects in India; Curr. Sci. 108 1815–1825.Google Scholar
  21. Jain V and Sinha R 2003 Geomorphological manifestations of the flood hazard: A remote sensing based approach; Geocarto Int. 18 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joyce R J, Janowiak J E, Arkin P A and Xie P 2004 CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution; J. Hydrometeor. 5 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kishore P, Jyothi S, Basha G, Rao S V B, Rajeevan M, Velicogna I and Sutterley T C 2016 Precipitation climatology over India: Validation with observations and reanalysis datasets and spatial trends; Clim. Dyn. 46 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kneis D, Chatterjee C and Singh R 2014 Evaluation of TRMM rainfall estimates over a large Indian river basin (Mahanadi); Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18 2493–2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar B, Lakshmi V and Patra K C 2017a Evaluating the uncertainties in the SWAT Model outputs due to DEM grid size and resampling techniques in a large Himalayan river basin; J. Hydrol. Eng. 22(9) 04017039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar B, Patra K C and Lakshmi V 2017b Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga; J. Geol. Soc. India 89 65–70.Google Scholar
  27. Kumar B, Patra K C and Lakshmi V 2016 Daily rainfall statistics of TRMM and CMORPH: A case for trans-boundary Gandak River basin; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 125 919–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Legates D R and McCabe G J 1999 Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation; Water Resour. Res. 35 233–241.Google Scholar
  29. Lu W U and Panmao Z 2012 Validation of daily precipitation from two high-resolution satellite precipitation datasets over the Tibetan plateau and the regions to its east; Acta Meteor. Sin. 26 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maggioni V, Meyers P C, Robinson M D, Maggioni V, Meyers P C and Robinson M D 2016 A review of merged high-resolution satellite precipitation product accuracy during the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) Era; J. Hydrometeorol. 17 1101–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKay M D, Beckman R J and Conover W J 1979 A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code; Technometrics 21(2) 239,  https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522.Google Scholar
  32. Meng X Y, Yu D L and Liu Z H 2015 Energy balance-based SWAT model to simulate the mountain snowmelt and runoff – taking the application in Juntanghu watershed (China) as an example; J. Mt. Sci. 12 368–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Binger R L, Harmel R D and Veith T L 2007 Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations; Trans. ASABE. 50 885–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Müller M F and Thompson S E 2013 Bias adjustment of satellite rainfall data through stochastic modeling: Methods development and application to Nepal; Adv. Water Resour. 60 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neitsch S, Arnold J, Kiniry J and Williams J 2011 Soil & water assessment tool theoretical documentation version; Texas Water Resour. Inst. TR-406, 647p.Google Scholar
  36. Nishat B and Rahman S M M 2009 Water resources modeling of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna River basins using satellite remote sensing data; JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 45 1313–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paiva R C D, Collischonn W and Tucci C E M 2011 Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach; J. Hydrol. 406 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penarrocha D, Estrela M J and Millan M 2002 Classification of daily rainfall patterns in a Mediterranean area with extreme intensity levels: The Valencia region; Int. J. Climatol. 22 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plengsaeng B, Wehn U and Van der Zaag P 2014 Data-sharing bottlenecks in transboundary integrated water resources management: A case study of the Mekong River Commission’s procedures for data sharing in the Thai context; Water Int. 39 933–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pradhanang S M, Anandhi A, Mukundan R, Zion M S, Pierson D C, Schneiderman E M, Matonse A and Fre A 2011 Application of SWAT model to assess snowpack development and streamflow in the Cannonsville watershed, New York, USA; Hydrol. Process. 25 3268–3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prakash S, Mahesh C, Sathiyamoorthy V, Gairola R M and Mitra A K 2015 An investigation of long-term changes in rainfall over the equatorial Indian Ocean trough region during northern summer using multisatellite data; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 124 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pushpalatha R, Perrin C, Le Moine N, Mathevet T and Andréassian V 2011 A downward structural sensitivity analysis of hydrological models to improve low-flow simulation; J. Hydrol. 411 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qiu J 2015 Droughts threaten high-altitude Himalayan forests; Nature,  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.16806.
  44. Rahman K, Maringanti C, Beniston M, Widmer F, Abbaspour K and Lehmann A 2013 Streamflow modeling in a highly managed mountainous glacier watershed using SWAT: The upper Rhone River watershed case in Switzerland; Water Resour. Manag. 27 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rahman M M, Goel N K and Arya D S 2012 Development of the Jamuneswari flood forecasting system: Case study in Bangladesh; J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 1123–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rahman M M, Arya D S, Goel N K and Mitra A K 2012 Rainfall statistics evaluation of ECMWF model and TRMM data over Bangladesh for flood related studies; Meteorol. Appl. 19 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robert A Houze Jr, Darren C W and Bradley F S 2007 Monsoon convection in the Himalayan region as seen by the TRMM precipitation radar; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 133 1389–1411.Google Scholar
  48. Roy S Sen, Saha S B, Fatima H, Bhowmik S K R and Kundu P K 2012 Evaluation of short-period rainfall estimates from Kalpana-1 satellite using MET software; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 121 1113–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saha S et al. 2010 The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 1015–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sahany S, Venugopal V and Ravi S N 2010 Diurnal-scale signatures of monsoon rainfall over the Indian region from TRMM satellite observations; J. Geophys. Res. 115 D02103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sevat E and A Dezetter 1991 Selection of calibration objective functions in the context of rainfall-runoff modeling in a Sudanese savannah area; Hydrol. Sci. J. 36 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shrestha D, Singh P and Nakamura K 2012 Spatiotemporal variation of rainfall over the central Himalayan region revealed by TRMM precipitation radar; J. Geophys. Res. 117 D22106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shrestha M S, Artan G A, Bajracharya S R, Gautam D K and Tokar S A 2011 Bias-adjusted satellite-based rainfall estimates for predicting floods: Narayani Basin; J. Flood Risk Manag. 4 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shukla S and Lettenmaier D P 2011 Seasonal hydrologic prediction in the United States: Understanding the role of initial hydrologic conditions and seasonal climate forecast skill; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 3529–3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uma R, Kumar T V L, Narayanan M S, Rajeevan M, Bhate J and Kumar K N 2013 Large scale features and assessment of spatial scale correspondence between TMPA and IMD rainfall datasets over Indian landmass; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 122 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. USDA-SCS 1972 Section 4: Hydrology: National Engineering Handbook, pp. 10-1–10-22.Google Scholar
  57. Viglione A, Borga M, Balabanis P and Blöschl G 2010 Barriers to the exchange of hydrometeorological data in Europe: Results from a survey and implications for data policy; J. Hydrol. 394 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xue X, Hong Y, Limaye A S, Gourley J J, Huffman G J, Khan S I, Dorji C and Chen S 2013 Statistical and hydrological evaluation of TRMM-based multi-satellite precipitation analysis over the Wangchu Basin of Bhutan: Are the latest satellite precipitation products 3B42V7 ready for use in ungauged basins?; J. Hydrol. 499 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour K C C, Xia J and Yang H 2008 Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China; J. Hydrol. 358 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zaharia L, Costache R, Prăvălie R and Minea G 2015 Assessment and mapping of flood potential in the Slănic catchment in Romania; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 124 1311–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMadanapalle Institute of Technology & ScienceMadanapalleIndia
  2. 2.School of Earth, Ocean and EnvironmentUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations