Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overexploitation and cumulative drought trend effect on Ras El Ain karstic spring discharge (Khabour Sub-basin, Syria)

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of climate change and overexploitation are being strongly perceived in the studied area and the springs discharge is obviously affected. In this paper, Ras El Ain spring discharge and precipitation were analyzed by normalized methods on an yearly timescale. The deficit of Ras El Ain spring discharge due to overexploitation factors and drought effects was estimated. Cumulative drought analyses were carried out using SPI10 and SQI10. Finally, the decreasing trends of the spring discharge due to the deficiency in rainfall were analyzed. The main results reveal that the annual mean deficit of Ras El Ain spring discharge due to overpumping was between 32 and 45%, whereas, annual mean deficit related to drought was between 22 and 35% on average, during the last 30 years (post-1984). The moving averages of SPI and SQI delineate very well the drought periods during last three decades. The cumulative droughts using SPI10 and SQI10 reveal that wet period (pre-1984) with positive values was characterized by high precipitation and spring discharge. Overexploitation period (1984–1989) is distinguished by decreasing SQI10 values whereas, SPI10 is almost stable. The response of the karst system to the precipitation signal has been changed, during the drought period (1990–2000), and the spring behaviour has been modified due to the first overexploitation period. Finally, overexploitation period (2001–2008) is related to the second phase of groundwater intensive pumping for irrigation purposes. Consequently, this period is completely catastrophic causing the drying up of the spring. The decreasing trends analyzed using DPI and DQI showed annual decreasing rates relative to the mean values of −0.268% and −0.105%, respectively. Thus, the results of theoretical model reveal that precipitation will decrease by about \(\hbox {DPI} = -20.7\)% and the discharge will decline by about −9.2% by 2050. Consequently, the declining discharge due to climatic variation under natural conditions as pre-1984 was about 10%. Whereas, the catastrophic drying up of the spring was probably the consequence of the anthropogenic effects. Accordingly, it requires the development of sustainable water resources management program to reduce long-term drought risks, restore the groundwater reservoir and minimize the overexploitation effects on spring discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou Zakhem B and Kattaa B 2016a Cumulative drought effect on Figeh karstic spring discharge (Damascus basin, Syria); Environ. Earth Sci., doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5013-3.

  • Abou Zakhem B and Kattaa B 2016b Investigation of hydrological drought using Cumulative Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI 30) in the eastern Mediterranean region (Damascus, Syria); J. Earth Syst. Sci., doi: 10.1007/s12040-016-0703-0.

  • ACSAD, GDTKB and GCHS 2003 (Arab Center for the Studies of Arid Zones and Dry Lands; General Directorate for Tigris and Khabour Basins; General Corporation for Hydrological Studies) 2003 Project of Preparation of a Database and a Mathematical Model for the Northern Part of the Khabour Basin; In: The Mathematical Model (General Report), Damascus.

  • AL-Charideh A and Abou Zakhem B 2009 Geochemical and isotopic characterization of groundwater from the Paleogene limestone aquifer of the Upper Jezireh, Syria; Environ. Earth Sci. 59 1065–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield J P and Marchant B P 2013 Analysis of groundwater drought building on the standardized precipitation index approach; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 4769–4787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorso B, Bordi I, Cancelliere A, Rossi G and Sutera A 2003 Spatial variability of drought: An analysis of SPI in Sicily; Water Resour. Manag. 17 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon D and Safadi C 1963 Ras El-Ain (the great karst springs of Mesopotamia); J. Hydrol. 1(1) 58–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere A, Di Mauro G, Bonaccorso B and Rossi G 2005 Stochastic forecasting of Standardized Precipitation Index; Proceedings of XXXI IAHR Congress on Water Engineering for the future: Choice and Challenges, Seoul, Korea, 11–16 September 2005, pp. 3252–3260.

  • Cancelliere A, Bonaccorso B and Di Mauro G 2006 A non-parametric approach for drought forecasting through the Standardized Precipitation Index; Giornata di Studio: Metodi Statistici e Matematici per l’Analisi delle Serie Idrologiche-Viterbo 2006.

  • Chen Z, Grasby S E and Osadetz K G 2004 Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada; J. Hydrol. 290 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A 2011 Drought under global warming: A review; Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2(1) 45–65, doi: 10.1002/wcc.81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D C and McKee T B 1997 Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales; Climatology Report Number 97-2, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

  • El-Hakim M and Bakalowicz M 2007 Significance and origin of very large regulating power of some karst aquifers in the Middle East. Implication on karst aquifer classification; J. Hydrol. 333 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO 2009 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Irrigation in the Middle East Region in Figures, aquastat survey 2008; In FAO Reports 34, Rome.

  • Fiorillo F, Esposito L and Guadagno F M 2007 Analyses and forecast of the water resource in an ultra-centenarian spring discharge series from Serino (southern Italy); J. Hydrol. 36 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F 2009 Spring hydrographs as indicators of droughts in a karst environment; J. Hydrol. 373 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F and Guadagno F M 2010 Karst spring discharges analysis in relation to drought periods, using the SPI; Water Resour. Manag. 24 1867–1884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F and Guadagno F M 2012 Long karst spring discharge time series and droughts occurrence in southern Italy; Environ. Earth Sci. 65(8) 2273–2283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F, Esposito L, Petitta M, Preziosi E and Tallini M 2014 Long-term trend and fluctuations of karst spring discharge in a Mediterranean area (central-southern Italy); Environ. Earth Sci., doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3946-6.

  • Guttman N B 1999 Accepting the Standardized Precipitation Index: A calculating algorithm; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(2) 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajispyrou E, Pashardes P, Photiou C, Rostan di N and Tsiourtis N X 2007 Application of the drought management guidelines in Cyprus [Part 2. Examples of application]; In: Drought management guidelines technical annex (eds) Iglesias A, Moneo M and López-Francos A, Zaragoza: CIHEAM/EC MEDA Water, pp. 215–244 (Options Méditerranéennes: Série B, Etudes et Recherches n. 58).

  • Hamdy A 2004 Drought preparedness and mitigation in the Mediterranean region; In: Water Management for Drought Mitigation in the Mediterranean, Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM), Options Méditerranéennes, Série B, N. 47, p. 328.

  • Hayes M J, Svoboda M, Le Comte D, Redmond K T and Pasteris P 2005 Drought monitoring: New tools for the 21st century; In: Drought and water crisis (ed.) Wilhite D A, Taylor and Francis, Boca Rateon, Florida.

  • Heim R R 2000 Drought indices: A review; In: Drought: A Global Assessment (ed.) Wilhite D A, Routledge, London and New York.

  • Hole F 2009 Drivers of unsustainable land use in the semi-arid Khabur River Basin, Syria; Geogr. Res. 47(1) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC 2007 Regional Climate Projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution to Working Group I and to AR4 (Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (eds) Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M and Miller H L, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 847–940.

  • Kattan Z 2001 Use of hydrochemistry and environmental isotopes for evaluation of groundwater in the Paleogene limestone aquifer of the Ras El-Ain area (Syrian Jezireh); J. Environ. Geol. 41 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Łabędzki L and Bąk B 2014 Meteorological and agricultural drought indices used in drought monitoring in Poland: A review; Meteorol. Hydrol. Water Manag. 2(2) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukas A and Vasiliades L 2004 Probabilistic analysis of drought spatiotemporal characteristics in Thessaly region, Greece; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 4 719–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J and Kleist J 1993 The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales; In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Boston, MA, USA, Am. Meteorol. Soc. 17(22) 179–183.

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J and Kleist J 1995 Drought monitoring with multiple time scales, Preprints, 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, Dallas, TX, Am. Meteor. Soc., pp. 233–236.

  • MED WS and D WG 2007 (Mediterranean Water Scarcity and Drought, Working Group): Technical report on water scarcity and drought management in the Mediterranean and the Water Framework Directive (Tec. Rep. 009-2007). EUWI/WFD Joint process, April 2007, http://www.emwis.net/topics/WaterScarcity.

  • Michaelides S and Pashiardis S 2008 Monitoring drought in Cyprus during the 2007–2008 hydrometeorological year by using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI); Eur. Water Publ. 23/24 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A K and Singh V P 2010 A review of drought concepts; J. Hydrol. 391(1–2) 202–216, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashiardis S and Michaelides S 2008 Implementation of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) for Regional Drought Assessment: A case study for Cyprus; Eur. Water Publ. 23/24 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragab R and Hamdy A 2004 Water management strategies to combat drought in the semiarid regions; In: Water Management for Drought Mitigation in the Mediterranean, Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM), Options Méditerranéennes, Série B, N. 47, p. 328.

  • Rossi G and Cancelliere A 2002 Early warning of drought: Development of a drought bulletin for Sicily; In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference “New trends in Water and Environmental Engineering for Safety and Life: Eco-compatible Solutions for Aquatic Environments”, Capri, Italy, June 24–28, 2002, pp. 1–12.

  • Sheffield J and Wood E F 2008 Global trends and variability in soil moisture and drought characteristics, 1950–2000, from observation-driven simulations of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle; J. Climate 21 432–458.

  • Sheffield J, Andreadis K M, Wood E F and Lettenmaier D P 2009 Global and continental drought in the second half of the 20th century: Severity–area–duration analysis and temporal variability of large-scale events; J. Climate 22 1962–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulka S and Wood A W 2008 Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought; Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 L02405, doi: 10.1029/2007GL032487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B A and Hunt B B 2010 A comparison of the 1950s drought of record and the 2009 drought, Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer, central Texas; Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans. 60 611–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnros T and Menzel L 2014 Addressing drought conditions under current and future climates in the Jordan River region; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgu E 2008 Using Standardized Precipitation Index for Monitoring Drought and Analyzing Drought. BALWOIS 2008 – Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia – 27, 31 May 2008.

  • UNDP-FAO 1966 Etudes des Ressources en Eaux Souterraines (République Arabe Syrienne); Rapport Final, FAO/SF: 17/SYR, p. 267.

  • UN-ESCWA and BGR 2013 (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia; Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) 2013 Inventory of Shared Water Resources in western Asia; Beirut.

  • Vicente-Serrano S M, Gonzalez-Hidalgo J C, De Luis M and Raventos J 2004 Drought patterns in the Mediterranean area: The Valencia region (eastern Spain); Climate Res. 26 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Serrano S M and López-Moreno J I 2005 Hydrological response to different time scale of climatological drought: An evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index in a mountainous Mediterranean basin; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 9 523–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite D A and Glantz M H 1987 Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definition; In: Planning for Drough (eds) Wilhite D A, Eastrling W E and Wood D A, Vestview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 11–27.

  • WMO 2012 Standardized Precipitation Index User Guide (eds) Svoboda M, Hayes M and Wood D A, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Zaitchik B, Smith R and Hole F 2002 Spatial analysis of agricultural land use changes in the Khabour river basin of northeastern Syria; In: Land Satellite Information IV: FIEOS, Denver, Colorado.

  • Zurek R 2007 The basic paths of energy flow and matter transformations in a lowland dam reservoir ecosystem; Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. XXXVI(2) 5–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Prof. I Othman, General Director of Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), for his guidance and support. Thanks are due to Dr S Ahmad, General Director of General Commission for Water Resources (GCWR), Dr B Kamal Addin, Deputy Director of (GCWR) and Dr S Obeid, Director of Water Resources Information Center (WRIC) for the providing the hydrological data. The authors would like to thank Associate Editor of JESS Prof. Subimal Ghosh and reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments and suggestions. Finally, thanks to the colleagues in Geology Department (AECS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geology Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), Damascus, Syria

    Boulos Abou Zakhem & Bassam Kattaa

Authors
  1. Boulos Abou Zakhem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bassam Kattaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boulos Abou Zakhem.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Subimal Ghosh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou Zakhem, B., Kattaa, B. Overexploitation and cumulative drought trend effect on Ras El Ain karstic spring discharge (Khabour Sub-basin, Syria). J Earth Syst Sci 126, 93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0882-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0882-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation