Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape level analysis of disturbance regimes in protected areas of Rajasthan, India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an urgent need to identify the human influence on landscape as disturbance regimes was realized for prioritization of the protected areas. The present study has attempted to describe the landscape level assessment of fragmentation and disturbance index in protected areas of Rajasthan using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Geospatial analysis of disturbance regimes indicates 61.75% of the total PAs are under moderate disturbance index followed by 28.64% and 9.61% under low and high respectively. Among the 28 protected areas- National Chambal WLS, Jaisamand WLS, Kumbhalgarh WLS, Sawai Man Singh WLS, Kailadevi WLS and Bandh Baratha WLS are representing high level of disturbance. The present study has emphasized the moderate to low disturbance regimes in protected areas, which infer low biotic pressure and conservation effectiveness of PA network in Rajasthan. The spatial information generated on PAs is of valuable use for forest management and developing conservation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambastha K R and Jha C S 2010 Geospatial analysis of Tamil Nadu Eastern Ghats forest types at landscape level with reference to fragmentation and species diversity; In: Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 38 453–463.

  • CBD 2004 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Biodiversity issues for consideration in the planning, establishment and management of protected area sites and networks. Montreal, SCBD, i–iv. (CBD Technical Series no. 15), 164p.

  • Forman T T and Godron M 1986 Landscape Ecology; John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSI 2011 State of Forest Report; Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India (GoI).

  • Hari Krishna P and Reddy C S 2012 Assessment of increasing threat of forest fires in Rajasthan, India using multitemporal remote sensing data (2005–2010); Curr. Sci. 102(9) 1288–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIRS 2002 Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level in north-east India using remote sensing and Geographical Information System; Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehra Dun, 296p.

  • IIRS 2011 Biodiversity characterization at landscape level in northwest India and Lakshadweep islands using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System; Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehra Dun, 277p (ISBN: 978-81-211-0774-7).

  • Kiester A R, Scott J M, Csuti B, Noss R F, Buterfield B, Sahr K and White D 1996 Conservation prioritisation using GAP data; Conser. Biol. 10(5) 1332–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth K K, Curran L M and Reuning-Scherer J D 2006 Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India; Biological Conservation 128 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludeke A K, Maggio R C and Reid L M 1990 An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS; J. Environ. Manag. 31 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon J G 1983 Landsat-derived land cover classification for locating potential Kestrel nesting habitat. Photogramm; Engg. Remote Sens. 49(2) 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy S and Kushwaha S P S 2010 Geospatial modelling of biological richness in Sunderbans; In: Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 38 431–440.

  • Pattanaik C, Reddy C S and Murthy M S R 2010 Geospatial modeling of biological richness in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary of Orissa, India; J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 38 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy C S 2008 Catalogue of invasive alien flora of India; Life Sci. J. 5(2) 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy C S, Hari Krishna P and Ravikiran A 2011 Mapping the vegetation types of Rajasthan, India using remote sensing data; J. Environ. Res. Manag. 2(1) 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme W H 1982 Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park; Ecol. Monogr. 52 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P S, Kushwaha S P S, Roy A, Karnataka H and Saran S 2013 Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial model; Anais XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto – SBSR, Foz do Igua¸cu, PR, Brasil, INPE, pp. 3321—3328 (http://www.dsr.inpe.br/sbsr2013/files/p0140.pdf).

  • Roy P S and Tomar S 2000 Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level using geo-spatial modeling technique; Biological Conservation 95 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P S, Tomar S and Jegannathan C 1997 Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level using satellite remote sensing; NNRMS Bulletin B-21 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakarwal S K and Ashok V 2008 Protected areas of Rajasthan. Conserving Biodiversity of Rajasthan; Himanshu Publications, pp. 16–30.

  • Salem B B 2003 Application of GIS to biodiversity monitoring; J. Arid Environ. 54 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V and Singh M 2006 Biodiversity of Desert National Park, Rajasthan; Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata.

  • Subin K J, Alex C J, Santhosh K, Abin V and Madhu G 2011 Landscape Metric Modeling – a technique for forest disturbance assessment in Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary; Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 4(58) 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G 1987 Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance; Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr V K Dadhwal, Director, NRSC and Dr P S Roy, Former Director, IIRS, Dehradun for suggestions and encouragement. The present work is carried out as part of national project on ‘Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using satellite remote sensing and geographical information system’ with financial support of Department of Space and Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P HARI KRISHNA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KRISHNA, P.H., REDDY, C.S., SINGH, R. et al. Landscape level analysis of disturbance regimes in protected areas of Rajasthan, India. J Earth Syst Sci 123, 467–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0409-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0409-0

Keywords.

Navigation