Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Model of erosion–landslide interaction in the context of the reservoir water level variations (East Siberia, Russia): Factors, environment and mechanisms

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A comprehensive investigation of landslide–erosion interactions has been carried out in the local shore geosystem of the Bykovo site located on the left shore of the Bratsk reservoir. The landslide process develops in the Mid-Quaternary grounds (aQ\(_{\rm II}^{3})\) of the erosion-accumulative terrace’s fragment that comprises sand, sand with pebbles, sandy loams and loams. This study aims to assess the environmental factors of interacting landslide and gully erosion processes, to estimate their temporal dynamics by comparative analysis of cartographic models based on the data of repeated theodolite surveys, and to find out what level regime of the reservoir stimulates the activation of the landslide process. The authors propose two-stage descriptive model of erosion–landslide interaction and development mechanisms in the context of the reservoir water level variations in the Bratsk reservoir. The activation of landslide processes in the reservoir shores follows the periods of high water level stands. Shore slope stability is disturbed by abrasion of slope foot and inundation of the slide zone. The soils subject to landslide, erosion–landslide and erosion processes differ in their microstructure and properties. Largest erosion susceptibility is typical of soils with skeleton-aggregated microstructure, fine- and coarse-silt sandy loams and loams of high porosity, whose interstructural bonds are attributed to water-soluble salts (Sws = 0.4–0.5%) and high carbonate contents (Scr = 34–66%). High dispersion and aggregation of clay fractions is typical of the loams of the slide zone. The structure of soils subject to deformation slide is represented primarily by fine-sand particles and aggregates with smaller cohesion and strength properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazhenova O I, Lyubtsova E M, Ryzhov Yu V and Makarov S A 1997 Spatio-temporal analysis of the dynamics of erosion processes in the south of Eastern Siberia; Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian).

  • Bondarik G K 1981 The general theory of engineering (physical) geology; Nedra, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundsen D and Thornes J B 1979 Landscape sensitivity and change; Trans. Inst. Brit. Georg. 4 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth D H 2005 Landslides in practice: Investigation and remedial/preventive options in soils; Wiley, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F 2003 Geological features and landslide mechanisms of an unstable coastal slope (Petacciato, Italy); Eng. Geol. 67 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Cipolla F, Sebastiani C, Galli M and Salvati P 2004 Landslides triggered by the 23 November 2000 rainfall event in the Imperia Province, Western Liguria, Italy; Eng. Geol. 73 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey A M 2001 Coupling between hillslopes and channels in upland fluvial systems: Implications for landscape sensitivity, illustrated from the Howgill Fells, northwest England; Catena 42 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey A M 2002 Effective timescales of coupling within fluvial systems; Geomorphology 44 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervas J (eds) 2003 Lessons learnt from landslide disasters in Europe; Report EUR 20558 EN, European Communities, Ispra.

  • Isika N S, Doyuranb V and Ulusays R 2004 Assessment of a coastal landslide subjected to building loads at Sinop, Black Sea, Turkey, and stabilization measures; Eng. Geol. 75 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov I P and Trzhtsinsky Yu B 2001 Engineering geodynamics; Nauka, St. Petersburg (in Russian).

  • Jian W, Wang Zh and Yin K 2009 Mechanism of the Anlesi landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China; Eng. Geol. 108 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khak V A and Kozyreva E A 2012 Changes of geological environment due to the anthropogenic impacts: A case study of south of East Siberia, Russia; Z. Geomorphol. 56 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krut I V 1973 The study bases of theoretical geology; Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larionov S A 1971 Methods of investigation of soil structure; Nedra, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Ma T, Zhu X and Li W 2011 The power-law relationship between landslide occurrence and rainfall level; Geomorphology 130 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Yin K and Leo Ch 2010 Analysis of Baishuihe landslide influenced by the effects of reservoir water and rainfall; Environ. Earth Sci. 60 677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomtadze V D 1977 Engineering geology. Engineering geodynamics; Nedra, Leningrad (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane D F 2009 Observations and predictions of the behaviour of large, slow-moving landslides in schist, Clyde Dam reservoir, New Zealand; Eng. Geol. 109 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarov S A, Ryashchenko T G and Akulova V V 2000 Geo-ecological analysis of territories marked by development of natural-technogenic processes in Neogene–Quaternary deposits of Pribaikalia; Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian).

  • Mazaeva O A, Kozyreva E A and Trzhtsinskii Yu B 2006 Assessing the interaction of exogenous processes in the local coastal geosystems of the Bratsk reservoir; Geography and Natural Resources 3 81–86 (in Russian).

  • Ovchinnikov G I, Pavlov S C and Trzhtsinsky U B 1999 Change of geological environment in the zones of influence of the Angara–Yenisei reservoirs; Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palshin G B (ed.) 1968 Engineering geology of Pribaikalia; Moscow, Nauka (in Russian).

  • Pinyol N M, Alonso E E, Corominas J and Moya J 2012 Canelles landslide: Modelling rapid drawdown and fast potential sliding; Landslides 9 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi S, Yan F, Wang S and Xu R 2006 Characteristics, mechanism and development tendency of deformation of Maoping landslide after commission of Geheyan reservoir on the Qingjiang River, Hubei Province, China; Eng. Geol. 86 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryashchenko T G 2010 Regional soil science (Eastern Siberia); IEC SB RAS, Irkutsk (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryashchenko T G, Akulova V V and Erbaeva M A 2008 Loessial soils of Priangaria, Transbaikalia, Mongolia, and northwestern China; Quat. Int. 179 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryashchenko T G, Akulova V V, Grigorieva I Yu, Ruwe D, Zhengzhong Zh and Chongshao S 2000 Analysis of microstructure of loesses of the Northern Loess Plateau, China; Geoecology, Engineering Geology, Hydrogeology, Geocryology 3 234–240 (in Russian).

  • Saito H, Nakayama D and Matsuyama H 2010 Relationship between the initiation of a shallow landslide and rainfall intensity – duration thresholds in Japan; Geomorphology 118 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab M, Rieke-Zapp D, Schneider H, Liniger M and Scjlunegger F 2008 Landsliding and sediment flux in the Central Swiss Alps: A photogrammetric study of the Schimbrig landslide, Entlebuch; Geomorphology 97 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery M C, Gares P A and Phillips J D 2002 Slope-channel linkage and sediment delivery on North Carolina coastal plain cropland; Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 27 1377–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzhtsinskii Yu B 1978 Landslides along the Angara reservoirs; Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. Environ. 17 42–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzhtsinsky Yu B, Pavlov S Kh and Kozyreva E A 2003 The landslides in karstic rock massifs of Upper Priangaria; Geography and Natural Resources 1 87–93 (in Russian).

  • Valentin C, Poesen J and Li Y 2005 Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control; Catena 63 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Peng Xu, Wang Sh and Yamasaki Sh 2008 Mechanism for the rapid motion of the Qianjiangping landslide during reactivation by the first impoundment of the Three Gorges Dam reservoir, China; Landslides 5 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yudin E G 1978 System approach and principles of activity; Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

  • Zinck J A, Lopez J, Metternichtj G I, Shresthal D P and Vazques-Selem L 2001 Mapping and modeling mass movements and gullies in mountainous areas using remote sensing and GIS techniques; Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. 3 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to VIKTORIA KHAK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MAZAEVA, O., KHAK, V. & KOZYREVA, E. Model of erosion–landslide interaction in the context of the reservoir water level variations (East Siberia, Russia): Factors, environment and mechanisms. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 1515–1531 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0363-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0363-2

Keywords

Navigation