Advertisement

Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 122, Issue 4, pp 991–1004 | Cite as

Lead time for medium range prediction of the dry spell of monsoon using multi-models

  • A JAYAKUMAREmail author
  • VINAY KUMAR
  • T N KRISHNAMURTI
Article

The purpose of this study is to address prediction of the start date and the duration of breaks in the summer monsoon rains using multi-model superensemble. The availability of datasets from the ‘observing system research and predictability experiment (THORPEX)’ initiated a forecast data archive, called THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble (TIGGE), makes it possible to use forecasts from a suite of individual ensemble prediction systems (member models) and to construct multi-model superensemble forecasts that are designed to remove the collective bias errors of the suite of models. Precipitation datasets are important for this study, we have used high resolution daily gridded rainfall dataset of India Meteorological Department (IMD), in addition to rainfall estimates from tropical rainfall microwave mission (TRMM) satellite and the CPC morphing technique (CMORPH). The scientific approach of this study entails the use of a multi-model superensemble for forecast and to verify against the rainfall information during a training phase, as well as during a forecast phase. We examine the results of forecasts out to day-10 and ask how well do forecast strings of day-1 through day-10 handle the prediction of the onset and duration of the breaks in the summer monsoon rains. Our results confirm that it is possible to predict the onset of a dry spell, around week in advance from the use of the multi-model superensemble and a suite of TIGGE models. We also examine trajectories of the parcels arriving in India in such forecasts from member models and from the multi-model superensemble to validate the arrival of descending dry desert air from the Arabian region during the dry spells and its mode of transition from wet spell. Some phenological features such as a shift in the latitude of the tropical easterly jet and changes in its intensity during break periods are additional observed features that are validated from the history of multi-model superensemble forecasts. Invariably this multi-model superensemble performs better than any single model in proving the better forecasts during our experiment period.

Keywords

THORPEX superensemble CMORPH trajectory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NSF Grant Number AGS-1047282. The authors sincerely thank TIGGE and THORPEX program for providing the forecast data. They also thank CISL computing support for data service.

References

  1. Bougeault P and Coauthors 2010 The THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 1059–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carl de Boor 1978 A practical guide to splines; Rev. edn, Appl. Math. Sci. 27, Springer-Verlag, New York Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Dee D P and Coauthors 2011 The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system; Quat. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 137 553–597, doi:  10.1002/qj.828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Draxler R R and Rolph G D 2012 HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY website (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
  5. Ferraro R R 1997 SSM/I derived global rainfall estimates for climatological applications; J. Geophys. Res. 102 16,715–16,735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gadgil Sulochana and Joseph P V 2003 On breaks of the Indian monsoon; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 112 529–558.Google Scholar
  7. Gopalan Kaushik, Nai-Yu Wang, Ralph Ferraro and Chuntao Liu 2010 Status of the TRMM 2A12 Land Precipitation Algorithm; J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 27 1343–1354, doi:  10.1175/2010JTECHA1454.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hong Y, Kummerow C and Olson W S 1999 Separation of convective/stratiform precipitation using microwave brightness temperature; J. Appl. Meteorol. 38 1195–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huffman G J, Adler R F, Rudolf B, Schneider U and Keehn P R 1995 Global precipitation estimates based on a technique for combining satellite-based estimates, rain gauge analysis, and NWP model precipitation information; J. Climate 8 1284–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joyce R J, Janowiak J E, Arkin P A and Xie P 2004 CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution; J. Hydrometeorol. 5 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishnamurti T N 2005 Weather and seasonal climate prediction of Asian summer monsoon; Review Topic B1a: Numerical Modeling-Forecast, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  12. Krishnamurti T N, Kishtawal C M, LaRow T E, Bachiochi D R, Zhang Z, Williford C E, Gadgil S and Surendran S 1999 Improved weather and seasonal climate forecasts from a multi-model superensemble; Science 285 1548–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krishnamurti T N, Kishtawal C M, Shin D W and Williford C E 2000 Improving tropical precipitation forecasts from a multianalysis superensemble; J. Climate 13 4217–4227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krishnamurti T N, Mishra A K, Chakraborty A and Rajeevan M 2009 Improving global model precipitation forecasts over India using downscaling and the FSU superensemble. Part I: 1–5-Day Forecasts; Mon. Weather Rev. 137 2713–2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krishnamurti T N, Thomas A, Simon A and Kumar V 2010 Desert air incursions, an overlooked aspect, for the dry spells of Indian summer monsoon; J. Atmos. Sci. 67 3423–3441, doi:  10.1175/2010JAS3440.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krishnan R, Zhang C and Sugi M 2000 Dynamics of breaks in the Indian summer monsoon; J. Atmos. Sci. 57 1354–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kummerow C, Olson W S and Giglio L 1996 A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors; IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 34 1213–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsueda M and Endo H 2011 Verification of medium-range MJO forecasts with TIGGE; Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 L11801, doi:  10.1029/2011GL047480.Google Scholar
  19. Mishra A K and Krishnamurti T N 2007 Current status of multimodel superensemble and operational NWP forecast of the Indian summer monsoon; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116 369–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neena J M, Suhas E and Goswami B N 2011 Leading role of internal dynamics in the 2009 Indian summer monsoon drought; J. Geophys. Res. 116 D13103, doi:  10.1029/2010JD015328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Press W H, Flannery B P, Teukolsky S A and Vetterling W T 1986 Numerical recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 818p.Google Scholar
  22. Rajeevan M, Bhate J, Kale J and Lal B 2006 High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the Indian region: Analysis of break and active monsoon spells; Curr. Sci. 91 296–306.Google Scholar
  23. Rajeevan M, Sulochana G and Bhate J 2010 Active and break spells of the Indian summer monsoon; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 119 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramamurthy K 1969 Some aspects of ‘break’ in the Indian south-west monsoon during July and August. Forecasting Manual, India Meteorological Department Publication, FMU, 4, 18.3. [Available from India Meteorological Department, Mausam Bhavan, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India.]Google Scholar
  25. Taylor K E 2001 Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram; J. Geophys. Res. 106(D7) 7183–7192, doi:  10.1029/2000JD900719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Waliser D E, Stern W, Schubert S and Lau K M 2003 Dynamic predictability of intraseasonal variability associated with the Asian summer monsoon; Quat. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 129 2897–2925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang B and Xu X H 1997 Northern hemisphere summer monsoon singularities and climatological intraseasonal oscillation; J. Climate 10 1071–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weigel A P, Liniger M A and Appenzeller C 2008 Can multi-model combination really enhance the prediction skill of probabilistic ensemble forecasts?; Quat. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 134 241–260, doi:  10.1002/qj.210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xie P, Mingyue C, Song Yang, Yatagai A, Tadahiro Hayasaka, Yoshihiro Fukushima and Changming Liu 2007 A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over east Asia; J. Hydrometeorol. 8 607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhi X, Haixia Q, Yongqing B and Lin C 2012 A comparison of three kinds of multi-model ensemble forecast techniques based on the TIGGE data; Acta Meteorol. Sinica 26(1) 41–51, doi:  10.1007/s13351-012-0104-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of MeteorologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations