Skip to main content
Log in

An assessment of the FlowCapt acoustic sensor for measuring snowdrift in the Indian Himalayas

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Wind caused snow drifting plays a dominant role in the redistribution of snow mass that restructures a snowpack. Strong wind activity at the mountain tops results in uneven distribution of snow with erosion on windward side and deposition on leeward areas. Such snowdrift events are responsible for the formation of cornices, increase in the loading of avalanche release zones on the leeward side and consequent increase in the level of avalanche hazard. In this paper, we present the results of snowdrift measurement using an acoustic snow-drift meter, the FlowCapt, built by IAV Engineering, which was used during winter seasons of 2007–2010 at a field research station of Snow and Avalanche Study Establishment (SASE) in the western Himalayas. The aim of the study was to evaluate the suitability of the instrument in measuring snowdrift in the Himalayan weather conditions. Results proved the utility of the instrument as a useful tool to study drifting snow in remote areas. However, in the absence of conventional snow gauges for validation, the quality of the absolute snow flux data could not be ascertained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagnold R A 1941 The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes, Methuen and Company, London, pp. 255–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolognesi R 1996 The driftometer; In: Proc. International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, Canada, pp. 129–133.

  • Brun E, David P, Sudul M and Brunot G 1992 A numerical model to simulate snow-cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting; J. Glaciol. 38(128) 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chritin V and Gubler H 2005 FlowCapt Nivo-meteorological Stations – Users instructions IAV Engineering, Lausanne, Switzerland, 10p.

  • Chritin V, Bolognesi R and Gubler H 1999 FlowCapt: A new acoustic sensor to measure snowdrift and wind velocity for avalanche forecasting; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 30 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand Y, Guyomarc’h G, Mérindol L and Corripio J G 2005 Improvement of a numerical snowdrift model and field validation; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 43 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greely R and Iversen J D 1985 Wind as a geological process on Earth, Mars, Venus and Titan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 95–96.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gubler H 1981 An electronic remote snow drift gauge; J. Glaciol. 27 164–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomarc’h G and Mérindol L 1998 Validation of an application for forecasting blowing snow; Ann. Glaciol. 26 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaedicke C 2001 Acoustic snowdrift measurements: Experiences from the FlowCapt instrument; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 32 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaedicke C 2002 Snow drift losses from an Arctic catchment on Spitsbergen: An additional process in the water balance; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 34 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo J and Yamazawa H 1986 Bulk transfer coefficient over a snow surface; Bound.-Layer. Meteorol. 34 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L and Pomeroy J W 1997 Estimates of threshold wind speeds for snow transport using meteorological data; J. Appl. Meteorol. 36 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberherr G 2010 Modeling snow drift in the turbulent boundary layer, MSc Thesis, Laboratory of Environmental Fluid Mechanics, EPFL Lausanne.

  • McClung D and Schaerer P 1993 The Avalanche Handbook, The Mountaineers, Seattle, WA, pp. 34–35.

  • Mellor M 1960 Gauging Antarctic drift snow; In: Antarctic Meteorology, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy J W and Gray D M 1990 The saltation of snow; Water Resour. Res. 26 1583–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SASE Annual technical report 2009 Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment, Chandigarh, India.

  • Schmidt R A 1977 A system that measures blowing snow; US Forest Service Research Paper no. RM-194, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, pp. 8–17.

  • Schmidt R A, Meister R and Gubler H 1984 Comparison of snow drifting measurements at an Alpine ridge crest; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 9 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S S and Ganju A 2000 Complexities of avalanche forecasting in Western Himalaya – an overview; Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 31 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiotani M and Arai H 1967 On the vertical distribution of blowing snow; In: Physics of Snow and Ice (ed.) Oura H, International Conference on Low Temperature Science, Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, pp. 1075–1083.

  • Sommerfeld R and Businger J A 1965 The density profile of blown snow; J. Geophys. Res. 70 3303–3306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi M 1980 Vertical profile and horizontal increase of drift snow transport; J. Glaciol. 26 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Shri. Ashwagosha Ganju, Director, Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment, for allowing them to carry out this research. Special thanks are due to Shri. Piyush Joshi for providing valuable guidance and Shri. S K Bhararia and Shri. R Chouhan for field assistance. The efforts made by Dr M R Bhutiyani and Dr J C Kapil in improving the quality of the manuscript are also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R K DAS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DAS, R.K., DATT, P. & ACHARYA, A. An assessment of the FlowCapt acoustic sensor for measuring snowdrift in the Indian Himalayas. J Earth Syst Sci 121, 1483–1491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0234-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0234-2

Keywords

Navigation