Skip to main content
Log in

Deterministic seismic hazard macrozonation of India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Earthquakes are known to have occurred in Indian subcontinent from ancient times. This paper presents the results of seismic hazard analysis of India (6°–38°N and 68°–98°E) based on the deterministic approach using latest seismicity data (up to 2010). The hazard analysis was done using two different source models (linear sources and point sources) and 12 well recognized attenuation relations considering varied tectonic provinces in the region. The earthquake data obtained from different sources were homogenized and declustered and a total of 27,146 earthquakes of moment magnitude 4 and above were listed in the study area. The sesismotectonic map of the study area was prepared by considering the faults, lineaments and the shear zones which are associated with earthquakes of magnitude 4 and above. A new program was developed in MATLAB for smoothing of the point sources. For assessing the seismic hazard, the study area was divided into small grids of size 0.1° × 0.1° (approximately 10 × 10 km), and the hazard parameters were calculated at the center of each of these grid cells by considering all the seismic sources within a radius of 300 to 400 km. Rock level peak horizontal acceleration (PHA) and spectral accelerations for periods 0.1 and 1 s have been calculated for all the grid points with a deterministic approach using a code written in MATLAB. Epistemic uncertainty in hazard definition has been tackled within a logic-tree framework considering two types of sources and three attenuation models for each grid point. The hazard evaluation without logic tree approach also has been done for comparison of the results. The contour maps showing the spatial variation of hazard values are presented in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson N A and Silva W J 1997 Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes; Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 94–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S and Bommer J J 2010 Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East; Seismol. Res. Lett. 81 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Vinod J S and Sitharam T G 2009 Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore; J. Natural Hazards 48 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson G M and Boore D M 2003 Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 1703–1729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson G M and Boore D M 2006 Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(6) 2181–2205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K L 1964 A note on the Coimbatore earthquake of 8th February 1900; Indian J. Meteorol. Geophys. 15(2) 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R 2004 Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: Tectonics, geodesy and history; Ann. Geophys. 47 839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS-1893 2002 Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 – General provisions and buildings; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

  • Biswas S and Dasgupta A 1986 Some observations on the mechanism of earthquakes in the Himalaya and the Burmese arc; Tectonophys. 122 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin P, Malagnini L and Akinci A 2004 Ground-motion scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, deduced from aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94 1658–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer J J, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F and Abrahamson N A 2005 On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boominathan A, Dodagoudar G R, Suganthi A and Uma Maheswari R 2008 Seismic hazard assessment of Chennai city considering local site effects; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 117 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore D M and Atkinson G M 2008 Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s; Earthquake Spectra 24 99–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budnitz R J, Apostolakis G, Boore D M, Cluff L S, Coppersmith K J, Cornell C A and Morris P A 1997 Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report, NUREG/CR- 6372.

  • Campbell K W and Bozorgnia Y 2003 Updated near-source ground motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 314–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U 1977 Earthquakes of peninsular India – a seismotectonic study; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67 1387–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U 1978 Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity; Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 16 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa G, Panza G F, Suhadolc P and Vaccari F 1993 Zoning of the Italian territory in terms of expected peak ground acceleration derived from complete synthetic seismograms; J. Appl. Geophys. 30 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer C H and Kumar A 2003 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake engineering seismoscope recordings and eastern North America ground motion attenuation relations; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 1390–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal K and Venkatraman N V et al. 2000 Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs; Geological Survey of India, Calcutta.

  • Davis S D and Frohlich C 1991 Single-link cluster analysis, synthetic earthquake catalogs and aftershock identification; Geophys. J. Int. 104 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshikachar S V 1974 A review of the tectonic and geological history of eastern India in terms of “plate tectonics” theory; J. Geol. Soc. India 15 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl E, Van der Hilst R and Buland R 1998 Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88 722–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P 1964 The tectonic framework of Assam; J. Geol. Soc. India 5 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesha Raj K and Nijagunappa R 2004 Major lineaments of Karnataka State and their relation to seismicity remote sensing based analysis; J. Geol. Soc. India 63 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangrade B K and Arora S K 2000 Seismicity of the Indian peninsular shield from regional earthquake data; Pure Appl. Geophys. 157 1683–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J K and Knopoff L 1974 Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64(5) 1363–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor N J, Silva W J, Wong I G and Youngs R 2002 Ground motion attenuation relationships for Cascadia subduction zone mega-thrust earthquakes based on a stochastic finite-fault modeling; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 1923–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha S K and Basu P C 1993 Catalogue of earthquakes (M≥3.0) in peninsular India; Atomic Energy Regulatory Board India, Tech. Document No. TD/CSE-1, pp. 1–70.

  • Gupta I D 2006 Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighborhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region; Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 26 766–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta I D 2010 Response spectral attenuation relations for intraslab earthquakes in Indo-Burmese subduction zone; Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30 368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B and Richter C F 1956 Magnitude and energy of earthquakes; Annali De Geofisica 9 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton T H, Tajima T F and Mori A W 1986 Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms; Surv. Geophys. 8 25–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar R N and Ghosh S 2004 Microzonation of earthquake hazard in Greater Delhi area; Curr. Sci. 87 1193–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar R N and Raghu Kanth S T G 2004 Attenuation of strong ground motion in peninsular India; Seismol. Res. Lett. 75(4) 530–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston A C 1996 Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions – Instrumental seismicity; Geophys. J. Int. 124 381–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Kapil M and Patel R C 2007 A deterministic approach for preparation of seismic hazard maps in northeast India; Nat. Hazards 43 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila K L and Sarkar D 1978 Atlas of isoseismal maps of major earthquakes in India; Geophys. Res. Bull. 16 234–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal J R 2008 Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics of south Asia, 1st edn, Springer Verlag and Capital Publishing Company, India, ISBN: 978–1–4020–8179–8.

  • Kelkar Y N 1968 Earthquakes experienced in Maharashtra during the last 300 years; Daily Kesari Poona, Marathi.

  • Kolathayar S, Sitharam T G and Vipin K S 2011 Spatial variation of seismicity parameters across India and adjoining areas; Nat. Hazards, doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9898-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan M S 1953 The structure and tectonic history of India; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 81 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Yuan X, Ravi Kumar M, Rainer Kind, Xueqing Li and Chadha R K 2007 The rapid drift of Indian tectonic plate; Nature 449 894–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin P S and Lee C T 2008 Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98 220–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Rui-feng, Chen Yun-tai, Ren Xiao, Xu Zhi-guo, Sun Li, Yang Hui, Liang Jian-hong and Ren Ke-xin 2007 Comparison between different earthquake magnitudes determined by China Seismograph Network; Acta Seismologica Sinica 20(5) 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan A K, Thakur V C, Sharma M L and Chauhan M 2009 Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India; Nat. Hazards, doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9439-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molchan G and Dmitrieva O 1992 Aftershock identification: Methods and new approaches; Geophys. J. Int. 109 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P and Tapponnier P 1979 The collision between India and Eurasia; In: Earthquakes and Volcanoes, Proc., from Scientific American, San Francisco: WH Freeman and Company, pp. 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath S K, Vyas M, Pal I and Sengupta P 2005 A hazard scenario in the Sikkim Himalaya from seismotectonics spectral amplification source parameterization and spectral attenuation laws using strong motion seismometry; J. Geophys. Res. 110 B01301, doi: 10.1029/2004/2004JB003199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath S K, Vyas M, Pal I, Singh A K, Mukherjee S and Sengupta P 2006 Spectral attenuation models in the Sikkim Himalaya from the observed and simulated strong motion events in the region; Curr. Sci. 88(2) 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath S K, Raj A, Thingbaijam K K S and Kumar A 2009 Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city – a stochastic approach; Seismol. Res. Lett. 80 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath S K and Thingbaijam K K S 2010 Peak ground motion predictions in India: An appraisal for rock sites; J. Seismol., doi: 10.1007/s10950-010-9224-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni J and Barazangi M 1986 Seismotectonics of the Zagros continental collision zone and a comparison with the Himalayas; J. Geophys. Res. 91 8205–8218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham T A 1883 Catalogue of Indian earthquakes; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 19 163–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panza G F, Vaccari F and Cazzaro R 1999 Deterministic seismic hazard assessment; In: Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation (eds) Wenzel F et al. (Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 269–286.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos B C, Karakostas V G, Kiratzi A A, Margaris B N, Papazachos C B and Scordilis E M 2002 Uncertainties in the estimation of earthquake magnitudes in Greece; J. Seismol. 6 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez I A, Vaccari F and Panza G F 2003 A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas; Geophys. J. Int. 155 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnachandra Rao N 1999 Single station moment tensor inversion for focal mechanisms of Indian intra-plate earthquakes; Curr. Sci. 77 1184–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth S T G and Iyengar R N 2006 Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city; Curr. Sci. 91(11) 1486–1494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth S T G and Iyengar R N 2007 Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in peninsular India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116(3) 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao B R and Rao P S 1984 Historical seismicity of peninsular India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74(6) 2519–2533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao B V and Murty B V S 1970 Earthquakes and tectonics in peninsular India; J. Indian Geophys. Union 7 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi B K 1974 Earthquake mechanisms and plate tectonics in the Himalayan region; Tectonophys. 21 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P 1985 Second-order moment of central California seismicity 1969-82; J. Geophys. Res. 90 5479–5495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy P R 2003 Need for high-resolution deep seismic reflection studies in strategic locales of south India; Curr. Sci. 84(8) 973–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage W U 1972 Microearthquake clustering near Fairview Peak Nevada, and in the Nevada seismic zone; J. Geophys. Res. 77(35) 7049–7056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scordilis E M 2006 Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude; J. Seismol. 10 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M L 1998 Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground acceleration using data from strong-motion arrays in India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88 1063–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M L and Malik S 2006 Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and estimation of spectral strong ground motion on bed rock in northeast India; 4th Int. Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, October 12–13, 2006.

  • Sharma M L, Douglas J, Bungum H and Kotadia J 2009 Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions; J. Earthq. Eng. 13 1191–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedlock K M 1999 Seismic hazard map of North and Central America and the Caribbean; Annali De Geofisica 42 977–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam T G and Anbazhagan P 2007 Seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore region; J. Nat. Haz. 40 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridevi J 2004 Estimates of plate velocity and crustal deformation in the Indian subcontinent using GPS geodesy; Curr. Sci. 86 1443–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava H N and Ramachandran K 1985 New catalog of earthquakes for peninsular India during 1839–1900; Mausam 36(3) 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp J C 1972 Analysis of the completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effects on statistical estimates of earthquakes hazard; Proc. Int. Conf. Microzonation for Safer Construct. Res. Appl., Seattle, Washington 64(4) 1189–1207.

  • Tandon A N and Srivastava H N 1974 Earthquake occurrence in India; In: Earthquake Engineering – Jai Krishna Commemoration Volume, Sarita Prakashan, Meerut, India.

  • Uhrhammer R A 1986 Characteristic of northern and central California seismicity abstract; Earthquake Notes 1 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vipin K S, Anbazhagan P and Sitharam T G 2009 Estimation of peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration for south India with local site effects: Probabilistic approach; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9 865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipin K S and Sitharam T G 2010 Multiple source and attenuation relationships for evaluation of deterministic seismic hazard: Logic tree approach considering local site effects; In: Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 5(3–4) 173–185, doi: 10.1080/17499518.2010.532015.

  • Youngs R R, Chiou S J, Silva W J and Humphrey J R 1997 Strong ground motion relationships for subduction earthquakes; Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J X, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio H K, Somerville P G, Fukushima Y and Fukushima Y 2006 Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96 898–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge IMD, BARC, USGS, ISC, IRIS and NGRI for providing the details of earthquake events in the Indian subcontinent. Authors are thankful to Centre for Infrastructure and Sustainable Transportation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore for providing necessary GIS tools and support for the present work. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments towards improving the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SREEVALSA KOLATHAYAR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KOLATHAYAR, S., SITHARAM, T.G. & VIPIN, K.S. Deterministic seismic hazard macrozonation of India. J Earth Syst Sci 121, 1351–1364 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0227-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0227-1

Keywords

Navigation