Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multifractal analysis of earthquakes in Kumaun Himalaya and its surrounding region

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Himalayan seismicity is related to continuing northward convergence of Indian plate against Eurasian plate. Earthquakes in this region are mainly caused due to release of elastic strain energy. The Himalayan region can be attributed to highly complex geodynamic process and therefore is best suited for multifractal seismicity analysis. Fractal analysis of earthquakes (mb ≥ 3.5) occurred during 1973–2008 led to the detection of a clustering pattern in the narrow time span. This clustering was identified in three windows of 50 events each having low spatial correlation fractal dimension (D C ) value 0.836, 0.946 and 0.285 which were mainly during the span of 1998 to 2005. This clustering may be considered as an indication of a highly stressed region. The Guttenberg Richter b-value was determined for the same subsets considered for the D C estimation. Based on the fractal clustering pattern of events, we conclude that the clustered events are indicative of a highly stressed region of weak zone from where the rupture propagation eventually may nucleate as a strong earthquake. Multifractal analysis gave some understanding of the heterogeneity of fractal structure of the seismicity and existence of complex interconnected structure of the Himalayan thrust systems. The present analysis indicates an impending strong earthquake, which might help in better hazard mitigation for the Kumaun Himalaya and its surrounding region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K 1981 A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena earthquake prediction; Maurice Ewing Ser. Am. Geophys. Union. Washington 4 556–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aki K 1984 Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction; J. Geophys. Res. 89 5867–5872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N and Jackson D 2003 A note on early earthquakes in the northern and southern Tibet; Curr. Sci. 84 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck S L and Ruff L J 1984 The rupture process of the great 1979 Colombia earthquake: Evidence for an asperity model; J. Geophys. Res. 89(B-11) 9281–9291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R 1995 Location and magnitude of the 1833 Nepal earthquake and its relation to the rupture zones of contiguous great Himalayan earthquakes; Curr. Sci. 69(2) 155–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Bodin P and Jackson M 1995 Entertaining a great earthquake in western Nepal: Historic inactivity and development of strain; J. Nepal Geol. Soc. 11 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Larson K, Freymueller J and Idylhim members 1997 GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya; Nature 386 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R and Ambraseys N 2005 Apparent Himalayan slip deficit from the summation of seismic moments for Himalayan earthquakes, 1500–2000; Curr. Sci. 88(10) 1658–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R and Wallace K 2005 Future M w  > 8 earthquakes in the Himalaya: Implications from the 26 December 2004 M w  = 9.0 earthquake on India’s eastern plate margin; Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ. 85 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunde A, Havlin S and Roman H E 1990 Multifractal features of random walks on random fractals; Phys. Rev. A 42 6274–6277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattin R and Avouac J P 2000 Modeling mountain building and the seismic cycle in the Himalaya of Nepal; J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 105(6) 13,389–13,407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Xia-Ting and Seto Masahiro 1999 Fractal structure of the time distribution of microfracturing in rocks; Geophys. J. Int. 136 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A 1964 Geology of Himalayas; Interscience Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahalaut V K and Chander R 1997 Evidence for an earthquake cycle in the NW outer Himalayas near 78° longitude, from precision levelling observation; Geophys. Res. Lett. 24 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger P and Procaccia I 1983 Characterizations of stranger attractors; Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 346–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey T C, Jenson M H, Kadanoff L P, Procaccia I and Shraiman B I 1986 Fractal measure and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets; Phys. Rev. A 33(2) 1141–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilarov V L 1998 Self-similar crack-generation effects in the fracture process in brittle materials; Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 6 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata T and Imoto M 1991 Multifractal analysis of spatial distributions of microearthquake in the Kanto Region; Geophys. J. Int. 107 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K and Matsuzaki M 1990 Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena; J. Geophys. Res. 95 6853–6860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaume S C and Sykes L R 1999 Evolving towards a critical point: A review of accelerating seismic moment/energy release prior to large and great earthquakes; Pure Appl. Geophys. 155 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouanne F, Mugnier J L, Gamond J F, Le Fort P, Pandey M R, Bollinger L, Flouzat M and Avouac J P 2004 Current shortening across the Himalayas of Nepal; Geophys. J. Int. 157(1) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan Y Y 1994 Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process; Physica D 77 160–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan Y Y 1997 Are earthquake predictable? Geophys. J. Int. 131 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan Y Y 1999 Is earthquake seismology a hard, quantitative science? Pure Appl. Geophys. 155 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri K N 1987 Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along Himalaya plate boundary; In: Earthquake Prediction (eds) K Mogi and K N Khattri, Tectonophys. 138 79–92.

  • Khattri K N 1992 Seismic hazard in Indian region; Curr. Sci. 62 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri K N and Tyagi A R 1983a Seismicity patterns in the Himalayan plate boundary and identification of the areas of high seismic potential; Tectonophys. 96(3/4) 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri K N and Tyagi A R 1983b The transverse tectonic features in Himalaya; Tectonophys. 96(1/2) 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G 1983 The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the earth and other solids by self-similar fault system: The geometrical origin of b-value; Pure Appl. Geophys. 121 761–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand D, Cisternas A and Dorbath L 1996 Multifractal analysis of the 1992 Erzincan aftershock sequence; Geophys. Res. Lett. 23(9) 933–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Mai Y-W and Xie H 2005 A sudden drop of fractal dimension: A likely precursor of catastrophic failure in disordered media; Philosophical Magazine Lett. 85(1) 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main I G 1992 Damage mechanics with long–range interactions – correlation between the seismic b-value and the fractal 2-point correlation dimension; Geophys. J. Int. 111 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main I G 1995 Earthquake as critical phenomena –implication for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 1299–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main I G 1996 Statistical physics. Seismogenesis and seismic hazard; Rev. Geophys. 34 433–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Mabawonku A O and Dimri V P 2005 Self-organized fractal seismicity of reservoir triggered earthquakes in the Koyna-Warna seismic zone, western India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 162 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B B 1989 Multifractal measures: Especially for the Geophysicist; Pure Appl. Geophys. 131(l/2) 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P 1987 The distribution of intensity associated with the 1905 Kangra earthquake and bounds of the extent of the rupture zone; J. Geol. Soc. India 29 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P and Pandey M R 1989 Rupture zones of great earthquakes in the Himalayan region; In: Frontiers of Seismology in India (ed.) Brune J N, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 98 61–70.

  • Nakaya S and Hashimoto T 2002 Temporal variation of multifractal properties of seismicity in the region affected by the mainshock of the October 6, 2000 Western Tottori prefacture, Japan, earthquake (M = 7.3); Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 133-1–133-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncel A O, Main I, Alptekin O and Cowie 1996 Spatial variation of the fractal properties of seismicity in the Anatolian fault zones; Tectonophys. 257 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncel A O and Wilson T H 2002 Space-time correlations of seismotectonic parameters: Example from Japan and from Turkey preceding the Izmith earthquake; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncel A O and Wilson T 2004 Correlation of seismotectonic variables and GPS strain measurements in western Turkey; J. Geophys. Res. 109 B11306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncel A O and Wilson T 2006 Evaluation of earthquake potential along the northern Anatolian fault zone in the Marmara sea using comparisons of GPS strain and seismotectonics parameters; Tectonophys. 418 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey M R, Tandukar R P, Avouac J P, Lave J and Massot J P 1995 Evidence for recent interseismic strain accumulation on a mid-crustal ramp in the central Himalayas of Nepal; Geophys. Res. Lett. 22 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawelzik K and Schuster H G 1987 Generalized dimensions and entropies from a measured time series; Phys. Rev. 35 481–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P N S and Ram A 2006 A correlation integral approach to the study of 26 January 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Gujarat, India; J. Geodyn. 41 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P N S and Padhi Ami 2007 Multifractal analysis of earthquakes in the southeastern Iran-Bam region; Pure Appl. Geophys. 167 2271–2290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P N S and Nath S K 2007 Precursory correlation dimensions for three great earthquakes; Curr. Sci. 93(11) 1522–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy P N S and Mondal S K 2010 Identification of seismicity pattern for some destructive earthquakes; In: Proceedings of the AGU Chapman Conference on Complexity and Extreme Events in Geosciences, National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India, 57p.

  • Rundle J B, Kanamori H and McNally K C 1984 An inhomogeneous fault model for gaps asperities, barriers and seismicity migration; J. Geophys. Res. 89 10,219–10,231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleur H, Sammis C G and Sornette D 1996a Discrete scale invariance, complex fractal dimensions, and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity; J. Geophys. Res. 101 17,661–17,677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleur H, Sammis C G and Sornette D 1996b Renormalization group theory of earthquakes; Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 3 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammis C G and Smith S W 1999 Seismic cycles and the evolution of stress correlation in cellular automation models of finite fault network; Pure Appl. Geophys. 155 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammis C G, Sornette D and Saleur H 1996 Complexity and earthquake forecasting, reduction and predictability of natural disasters, SFI studies in the science of complexity; vol. XXV (eds) Rundle J B, Klein W and Turcotte DL (Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley); pp. 143–156.

  • Sammonds P R, Meredith P G and Main I G 1992 Role of pore fluid in the generation of seismic precursors to shear fracture; Nature 359 228–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H N, Paudyal H, Shanker D, Panthi A, Kumar A and Singh V P 2010 Anomalous seismicity and earthquake forecast in western Nepal Himalaya and its adjoining Indian region; Pure. Appl. Geophys. 167 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sornette D and Sammis C G 1995 Complex critical exponents from renormalization group theory of earthquakes: Implications of earthquake predictions; J. Phys. 22 411–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teotia S S, Khattri K N and Roy P K 1997 Multifractal analysis of seismicity of the Himalyan region; Curr. Sci. 73 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telesca L, Cuomo V, Lapenna V and Macchiato M 2001 Identifying space–time clustering properties of the 1983–1997 Irpinia–Basilicata (southern Italy) seismicity; Tectonophys. 330(1–2) 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya K S 1976 Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of north Indian plains; Tectonophys. 32 353–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright D 1877 History of Nepal; 1966 reprint: Calcutta, Ranjan Gupta, 271p.

  • Xie H 1992 Fractals in Rock Mechanics; A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (html link) http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/epic/epic_rect.php

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ministry of Earth Science, Government of India for sponsoring this work (Project MoES/P.O.(Seismo)/ GPS/60/2006). Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology is thankfully acknowledged for providing local network data. They are also thankful to anonymous reviewer and Prof. Malay Mukul, Associate Editor for suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Geophysics, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, 826 004, Jharkhand, India

    P N S ROY & S K MONDAL

Authors
  1. P N S ROY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S K MONDAL
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P N S ROY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROY, P.N.S., MONDAL, S.K. Multifractal analysis of earthquakes in Kumaun Himalaya and its surrounding region. J Earth Syst Sci 121, 1033–1047 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0208-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0208-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation