Abstract
It is not clearly known as to why some people identify camouflaged objects with ease compared with others. The literature suggests that Field-Independent individuals detect camouflaged object better than their Field-Dependent counterparts, without having evidence at the neural activation level. A paradigm was designed to obtain neural correlates of camouflage detection, with real-life photographs, using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-three healthy human subjects were stratified as Field-Independent (FI) and Field-Dependent (FD), with Witkin’s Embedded Figure Test. FIs performed better than FDs (marginal significance; p=0.054) during camouflage detection task. fMRI revealed differential activation pattern between FI and FD subjects for this task. One sample T-test showed greater activation in terms of cluster size in FDs, whereas FIs showed additional areas for the same task. On direct comparison of the two groups, FI subjects showed additional activation in parts of primary visual cortex, thalamus, cerebellum, inferior and middle frontal gyrus. Conversely, FDs showed greater activation in inferior frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, putamen, caudate nucleus and superior parietal lobule as compared to FIs. The results give preliminary evidence to the differential neural activation underlying the variances in cognitive styles of the two groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen G, Buxton R, Wong E and Courchesne E 1997 Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 275 1940–1943
Bhattacharya M, Modi S, Kumaran S, Khushu S 2006 Neurocognitive mapping of visuospatial judgment in healthy subjects and chronic alcoholics – an fMRI study; Proc. 14th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of ISMRM (Seattle, Washington, USA), Vol 315, p 17
Boot WR, Neider MB and Kramer AF 2009 Training and transfer of training in the search for camouflaged targets. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71 950–963
Canelos J, Taylor WD and Gates RB 1980 The effects of three levels of visual stimulus complexity on the information processing of field-dependents and field-independents when acquiring information for performance on three types of instructional objectives. J. Instr. Psychol. 7 65–70
Chang L, Yakupov R, Cloak C and Ernst T 2006 Marijuana use is associated with a reorganized visual-attention network and cerebellar hypoactivation. Brain 129 1096–1112
Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K and Zilles K 2005 A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functionalimaging data. Neuroimage 25 1325–1335
Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA and Noll DC 1995 Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster size threshold. Magn. Reson. Med. 33 636–647
Frank BM and Davis JK 1982 Effect of field-independence match or mismatch on a communication task. J. Educ. Psychol. 74 23–31
Goodal MA and Milner AD 1992 Separate pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15 20–25
Haber S and McFarland NR 2001 The place of the thalamus in frontal cortical-basal ganglia circuits. Neuroscientist 7 315–324
Hugdahl K, Thomsen T and Ersland L 2006 Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 44 1575–83
Lamme VAF 1995 The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 132 1605–1615
Lu C and Suen J 1995 Assessment approaches and cognitive styles. J. Educ. Meas. 32 1–17
Melchitzky D and Lewis D 2000 Tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter immune reactive axons in the primate cerebellum. Evidence for a lobular and laminar specific dopamine innervations. Neuropsychopharmacology 22 466–472
Messick S 1976 Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity; in Individuality in learning (ed) S. Messick (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass) pp 4–22
Moore AB, Li Z, Tyner CE, Hu X, Crosson B 2012 Bilateral basal ganglia activity in verbal working memory. Brain Lang. Nordic Neuro lab, Making fMRI easy (http://www.nordicneurolab.com/Products_and_Solutions/nordic_fMRI_solution/index.aspx)
Pizlo Z 2008 3D shape: its unique place in visual perception (Cambridge: MIT Press)
Steriade M and Llinas R 1988 The functional states of the thalamus and the associated neuronal interplay. Physiol. Rev. 68 699–742
Stoodley CJ and Schmahmann JD 2009 Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 44 489–501
Thorpe S, Fize D and Marlot C 1996 Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 520–522
Tripathi RP, Bhattacharya M, Modi S, Devi M, Deshpande SN, Khushu S 2008 Assessment of visuospatial symmetry judgment deficit in alcohol dependants through fMRI and Voxel Based Morphometry; in Proc. Eur. Congress Radiol. (Vienna, Austria) Vol B-546, p 264
Troscianko T, Benton CP, Lovell G, Tolhurst DG and Pizlo Z 2009 Camouflage and visualperception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364 449–461
Vandenberghe R, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB and Mesulam MM 2001 Functional specificity of superior parietal mediation of spatial shifting. Neuroimage 14 661–673
Siok WT, Kay P, Wang WSY, Chan AHD, Chen L, Luke K-K and Tan LH 2009 Language regions of brain are operative in color perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 208140–208145
Wolfe JM, Oliva A, Horowitz TS, Butcher SJ and Bompas A 2002 Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Res. 42 2985–3004
Witkin HA 1971 A manual of the embedded figure test (Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist's Press)
Witkin HA 1948 The effect of training and of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation; Report No. 80 (Washington, D.C. Civil Aeronautics Administration, Division of Research)
Witkin HA, Moore CA, Goodenough DR and Cox PW 1977 Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev Educ Res. 47 1–66
Song X-W, Dong Z-Y, Long X-Y, Li S-F, Zuo X-N, Zhu C-Z, He Y, Yan C-G, et al. 2011 REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One 6 e25031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Corresponding editor: Neeraj Jain
[Rajagopalan J, Modi S, Kumar P, Khushu S and Mandal MK 2015 Differential neural activation for camouflage detection task in Field-Independent and Field-Dependent individuals: Evidence from fMRI. J. Biosci.] DOI 10.1007/s12038-015-9568-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajagopalan, J., Modi, S., Kumar, P. et al. Differential neural activation for camouflage detection task in Field-Independent and Field-Dependent individuals: Evidence from fMRI. J Biosci 40, 909–919 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-015-9568-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-015-9568-7