Phylogenetic diversity of Mesorhizobium in chickpea
- 293 Downloads
Crop domestication, in general, has reduced genetic diversity in cultivated gene pool of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as compared with wild species (C. reticulatum, C. bijugum). To explore impact of domestication on symbiosis, 10 accessions of chickpeas, including 4 accessions of C. arietinum, and 3 accessions of each of C. reticulatum and C. bijugum species, were selected and DNAs were extracted from their nodules. To distinguish chickpea symbiont, preliminary sequences analysis was attempted with 9 genes (16S rRNA, atpD, dnaJ, glnA, gyrB, nifH, nifK, nodD and recA) of which 3 genes (gyrB, nifK and nodD) were selected based on sufficient sequence diversity for further phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic analysis and sequence diversity for 3 genes demonstrated that sequences from C. reticulatum were more diverse. Nodule occupancy by dominant symbiont also indicated that C. reticulatum (60%) could have more various symbionts than cultivated chickpea (80%). The study demonstrated that wild chickpeas (C. reticulatum) could be used for selecting more diverse symbionts in the field conditions and it implies that chickpea domestication affected symbiosis negatively in addition to reducing genetic diversity.
KeywordsChickpea domestication nitrogen fixation rhizobia symbiosis
This study has been supported by US National Science Foundation (NSF) – Basic Research Enabling Agriculture in Developing Countries (BREAD) grant entitled ‘Overcoming the Domestication Bottleneck for Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes’. The authors are thankful to Douglas R Cook and R Varma Penmetsa of University of California-Davis, and Eric von Wettbergof Florida International University, USA, for their help and support in various ways during the course of the study. This work has been undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes. ICRISAT is a member of CGIAR Consortium.
- Agarwal G, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Singh VK, Saxena MS, Parida SK, Garg R, Tyagi AK and Jain M 2012 Comparative analysis of kabuli chickpea transcriptome with desi and wild chickpea provides a rich resource for development of functional markers. PLoS ONE 7 e52443PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ben Romdhane S, Aouani ME, Trabelsi M, De Lajudie P and Mhamdi R 2008 Selection of high nitrogen-fixing Rhizobia nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum) for semi-arid Tunisia. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194 413–420Google Scholar
- Ben Romdhane S, Tajini F, Trabelsi M, Aouani M and Mhamdi R 2007 Competition for nodule formation between introduced strains of Mesorhizobium ciceri and the native populations of rhizobia nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Tunisia. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23 1195–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margaret I, Becker A, Blom J, Bonilla I, Goesmann A, Göttfert M, Lloret J, Mittard-Runte V, et al. 2011 Symbiotic properties and first analyses of the genomic sequence of the fast growing model strain Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 nodulating soybean. J. Biotechnol. 155 11–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martens M, Delaere M, Coopman R, De Vos P, Gillis M and Willems A 2007 Multilocus sequence analysis of Ensifer and related taxa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57 489–503Google Scholar
- Ormeno-Orrillo E, Menna P, Almeida LG, Ollero FJ, Nicolas MF, Pains Rodrigues E, Shigueyoshi Nakatani A, Silva Batista JS, et al. 2012 Genomic basis of broad host range and environmental adaptability of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 and Rhizobium sp. PRF 81 which are used in inoculants for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). BMC Genomics 13 735PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson J, Reen R, Clewett T, Sheedy J, Kelly A, Gogel B and Knights E 2011 Hybridisation of Australian chickpea cultivars with wild Cicer spp. increases resistance to root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus thornei and P. neglectus). Australas. Plant Pathol. 40 601–611Google Scholar