Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in predatory pressure on terrestrial snails by birds and mammals

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of shell polymorphism in terrestrial snails is a classic textbook example of the effect of natural selection in which avian and mammalian predation represents an important selective force on gene frequency. However, many questions about predation remain unclear, especially in the case of mammals. We collected 2000 specimens from eight terrestrial gastropod species to investigate the predation pressure exerted by birds and mice on snails. We found evidence of avian and mammalian predation in 26.5% and 36.8% of the shells. Both birds and mammals were selective with respect to snail species, size and morphs. Birds preferred the brown-lipped banded snail Cepaea nemoralis (L.) and mice preferred the burgundy snail Helix pomatia L. Mice avoided pink mid-banded C. nemoralis and preferred brown mid-banded morphs, which were neglected by birds. In contrast to mice, birds chose larger individuals. Significant differences in their predatory pressure can influence the evolution and maintenance of shell size and polymorphism of shell colouration in snails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JA 2004 Avian and mammalian predators of terrestrial gastropods; in, Natural enemies of terrestrial molluscs (ed) GM Barker (New Zeeland: CABI Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JA and Clarke BC 1968 Evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerines. Nature (London) 220 501–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen JA, Raymond DL and Geburtig MA 1988 Wild birds prefer the familiar morph when feeding on pastry-filled shells of the landsnail Cepaea hortensis (Mull.). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33 395401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantock CR and Bayley JA 1973 Visual selection for shell size in Cepaea (Held.). J. Anim. Ecol. 42 247261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur B and Baur A 1993 Climatic warming due to thermal radiation from an urban area as possible cause for the local extinction of a land snail. J. Appl. Ecol. 30 333340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengston S, Nillson A, Nordström S and Rundgren S 1976 Polymorphism in relation to habitat in the snail Cepaea hortensis in Iceland. J. Zool. Lond. 178 173188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne GR 1993 Differential snail-size predation by snail kites and limpkins. Oikos 68 217223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain AJ 1953 Visual selection by tone of Cepaea nemoralis. J. Conchol. 23 333336

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain AJ and Currey JD 1967 Studies on Cepaea. III. Ecogenetics of a population of Cepaea namoralis (L.) subject to strong area effects. Phil. Trans. B 253 447482

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain AJ and Sheppard PM 1950 Selection in the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity 4 275294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cain AJ and Sheppard PM 1954 Natural selection in Cepaea. Genetics 39 89116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron RAD 1969 Predation by song thrushes Turdus ericetorum (Turton) on the snails Cepaea hortensis (Mull.) and Arianta arbustorum (L.) near Rickmansworth. J. Anim. Ecol. 38 547553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke BC 1969 The evidence for apostatic selection. Heredity 24 347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook LM 2005 Disequilibrium in some Cepaea populations. Heredity 94 497500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook LM and O’Donald P 1971 Shell size and natural selection in Cepaea nemoralis; in Ecological genetics and evolution (ed) ER Creed (Oxford: Blackwell)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison A 2002 Land snails as a model to understand the role of history and selection in the origins of biodiversity. Popul. Ecol. 44 129136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solis J, Abella JC and Aymi R 1996 Shell size relationships in the consumption of gastopods by migrant song thrushes Turdus philomelos. Avocetta 20 147149

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart CB 1987 Why are some snails visibly polymorphic and others not? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 31 3558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J 1974 Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14 413417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JS 1982 Genetic differences in individual behaviour associated with shell polymorphism in the snail Cepaea nemoralis. Nature 298 749–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JS, Leith BH and Rawlings P 1977 Polymorphism in Cepaea: a problem with too many solutions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8 109–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordaens K, De Wolf H, Vandecasteele B, Blust R and Blackeljau T 2006 Associations between shell strength, shell morphology and heavy metals in land snail Cepaea nemoralis (Gastropoda, Helicidae). Sci. Total Environ. 363 285293

  • Manly BF J, McDonald LL and Thomas DL 1993 Resource Selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies (London: Chapman and Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Rueda G 2009 Disruptive selection by predation offsets stabilizing selection on shell morphology in the land snail Iberus g. gualtieranus. Evol. Ecol. 23 463471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris D 1954 The snail-eating behaviour of thrushes and blackbirds. Br. Birds 47 3348

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris K and Johnstone I 1998 The functional response of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) searching for cockles (Cerastoderma edule) by touch. J. Anim. Ecol. 67 329346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oscoz J, Leunda PM, Miranda R and Escala MC 2006 Summer feeding relationships of the co-occurring Phoxinus phoxinusand Gobio lozanoi (Cyprinidae) in an Iberian river. Folia Zool. 55 418–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Punzalan D, Rodd HF and Hughes KA 2005 Perceptual processes and the maintenance of polymorphism through frequency-dependent predation. Evol. Ecol. 19 303320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quensen III JF and Woodruff DS 1997 Associations between shell morphology and land crab predation in the land snail Cerion. Funct. Ecol. 11 464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed WL and Janzen FJ 1999 Natural selection by avian predators on size and colour of a freshwater snail (Pomacea flagellata). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 67 331342

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards AJ 1977 Predation of snails by migrant song thrushes and redwings. Bird Study 24 5354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage RE 1931 The relation between the feeding of the herring off the east coast of England and the plankton of the surrounding waters. Fish. In. Min. Fish. Food 12 1–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard PM 1951 Fluctuations in the selective value of certain phenotypes in the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis (L.). Heredity 5 125134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slotow R, Goodfriend W and Ward D 1993 Shell colour polymorphism of the Negev desert landsnail, Trochoidea seetzeni: the importance of temperature and predation. J. Arid Environ. 24 4761

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc 2003 SPSS for Windows – Release 13.0 (1 Sep 2004), Leadtools (c), Lead Technologies Inc

  • Stephen DW and Krebs JR 1986 Foraging theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen L 1960 The natural control of insects in pine woods. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch. Néderl. Zool. 13 265–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardhaugh AA 1984 Some observations on the molluscan diet of the song thrush. Br. Birds 77 365366

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H 1963 Natural populations of the polymorphic landsnail Cepaea nemoralis (L.). Factors affecting their size and their genetic constitution. Arch. Néderl. Zool. 15 381471

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH 2010 Biostatistical analysis 5th edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank TH Sparks, P Skórka and A Lesicki, for critical discussions and reading of the manuscript, and DG Homberger, G Moreno-Rueda and the anonymous referee for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuzanna M Rosin.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Dominique G Homberger

[Rosin ZM, Olborska P, Surmacki A and Tryjanowski P 2011 Differences in predatory pressure on terrestrial snails by birds and mammals. J. Biosci. 36 691–699] DOI 10.1007/s12038-011-9077-2

Supplementary materials pertaining to this article are available on the Journal of Biosciences Website at http://www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci/Sep2011/pp691–699/suppl.pdf

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 47.9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosin, Z.M., Olborska, P., Surmacki, A. et al. Differences in predatory pressure on terrestrial snails by birds and mammals. J Biosci 36, 691–699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9077-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9077-2

Keywords

Navigation