Abstract
Variation in the subtle differences between the right and left sides of bilateral characters or fluctuating asymmetry (FA) has been considered as an indicator of an organism’s ability to cope with genetic and environmental stresses during development. However, due to inconsistency in the results of empirical studies, the relationship between FA and stress has been the subject of intense debate. In this study, we investigated whether stress caused by artificial bidirectional selection for body size has any effect on the levels of FA of different morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae. The realised heritability (h2) was higher in low-line females and high-line males, which suggests an asymmetrical response to selection for body size. Further, the levels of FA were compared across 10 generations of selection in different selection lines in both sexes for sternopleural bristle number, wing length, wing-to-thorax ratio, sex comb-tooth number and ovariole number. The levels of FA differed significantly among generations and selection lines but did not change markedly with directional selection. However, the levels of FA were higher in the G10 generation (at the end of selection) than G0 (at the start of selection) but lower than the G5 generation in different selection lines, suggesting that the levels of FA are not affected by the inbreeding generated during the course of selection. Also, the levels of FA in the hybrids of high and low lines were significantly lower than the parental selection lines, suggesting that FA is influenced by hybridisation. These results are discussed in the framework of the literature available on FA and its relationship with stress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FA:
-
fluctuating asymmetry
- h2 :
-
realised heritability
- ME:
-
measurement error
References
Arendt J D 1997 Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa; Q. Rev. Biol.72 149–177
Alibert P and Auffray J-C 2003 Genomic coadaptation, outbreeding depression, and developmental instability; in Developmental instability: causes and consequences (ed.) M Polak (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 116–134
Aparicio J M and Bonal R 2002 Why do some traits show higher fluctuating asymmetry than others? A test of hypotheses with tail feathers of birds; Heredity 89 139–144
Barker J S F and Krebs R A 1995 Genetic variation and plasticity of thorax length and wing length in Drosophila aldrichi and D. buzzatii; J. Evol. Biol. 8 689–709
Clarke G M 1997 The genetic and molecular basis of developmental stability: the Lucilia story; TREE 15 163–166
Clarke G M and McKenzie J A 1987 Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly: a result of canalizing natural selection; Nature (London) 325 345–346
Falconer D S and Mackay T F C 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics (New Delhi, India: Longman)
Fowler K and Whitlock M C 1994 Fluctuating asymmetry does not increase with moderate inbreeding in D. melanogaster; Heredity 73 373–376
Gavrilets S and Hastings A 1994 A quantitative genetic model for selection on developmental noise; Evolution 48 1478–1486
Leamy L 1986 Directional selection and developmental stability-evidence from fluctuating asymmetry of dental characters in mice; Heredity 57 381–388
Leamy L and Klingenberg C P 2005 The genetics and evolution of fluctuating asymmetry; Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys. 36 1–21
Lerner I M 1954 Genetic homeostasis (Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd)
Mitton J B 1993 Enzyme heterozygosity, metabolism and developmental instability; Genetica 89 47–66
Mpho M, Callaghan A and Holloway G J 2002 Temperature and genotypic effects on life history and fluctuating asymmetry in a field strain of Culex pipiens; Heredity 88 307–312
Møller A P and Pomiankowski A 1993 Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection; Genetica 89 267–279
Norry F M, Vilardi J C, Iriate P F and Hasson E 1997 Correlations among size related traits affected by chromosome inversion in Drosophila buzzatii: the comparison within and across environment; Hereditas 126 225–231
Parsons P A 1990 Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress; Biol. Rev. 65 131–145
Parsons P A 1992 Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress; Heredity 68 361–364
Palmer A R 1994 Fluctuating asymmetry analysis: a primer; in Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications (ed.) T A Markow (Drodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers) pp 335–364
Palmer A R and Strobeck C 1986 Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns; Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17 391–421
Palmer A R and Strobeck C 2003 Fluctuating asymmetry analysis revisited: in Developmental instability: causes and consequences (ed.) M Polak (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 279–319
Pelabon C, Hanson T F, Carter A J R and Houle D 2006 Response of fluctuating and directional asymmetry to selection on wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster; J. Evol. Biol. 19 764–776
Shakarad M, Prasad N G, Rajamani M and Joshi A 2001 Evolution of faster development does not lead to greater fluctuating asymmetry of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila; J. Genet. 80 1–7
Singh B N 1996 Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae; Genetica 97 321–329
Singh B N 2000 Drosophila ananassae: a species characterized by several unusual genetic features; Curr. Sci. 78 391–398
Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 2000 Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research (New York: W H Freeman and Company)
Soule M 1967 Phenetics of natural populations. II. Asymmetry and evolution in a lizard; Am. Nat. 101 141–160
Van Valen L 1962 A study of fluctuating asymmetry; Evolution 16 125–142
Van Dongen S 2006 Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future; J. Evol. Biol. 19 1727–1743
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2006 Fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in laboratory populations of D. ananassae; Genome 49 777–785
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2008a Mating success is not correlated with fluctuating asymmetry in Drosophila ananassae; Curr. Sci. 94 377–381
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2008b Effect of developmental temperature stress on fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae; J. Therm. Biol. 33 201–208
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2008c Effect of environmental stress on fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae: nutrition and larval crowding; Can. J. Zool. 86 427–437
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2008d Effect of mutations on developmental stability and canalization of morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae; J. Hered. 99 539–545
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2008e Can fluctuating asymmetry in morphological traits be used to detect inbreeding in Drosophila ananassae?; Dros. Inf. Serv. 91 (in press)
Vishalakshi C and Singh B N 2009 Fluctuating asymmetry in hybrids of sibling species, Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa is trait and sex specific; J. Hered. 100 181–191
Waldmann P 1999 The effect of inbreeding and population hybridization on developmental instability in petals and leaves of the rare plant Silene diclinis (Caryophyllaceae); Heredity 83 138–144
Yadav J P and Singh B N 2006 Evolutionary genetics of Drosophila ananassae. I. Effect of selection on body size and inversion frequencies; J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 44 323–329
Zar J H 2005 Biostatistical analysis (Delhi, India: Pearson seducation)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vishalakshi, C., Singh, B.N. Effect of directional selection for body size on fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae . J Biosci 34, 275–285 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-009-0031-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-009-0031-5