Skip to main content
Log in

Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in drug-DNA complexes: A statistical analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical analysis of strong and weak hydrogen bonds in the minor groove of DNA was carried out for a set of 70 drug-DNA complexes. The terms ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ pertain to the inherent strengths and weakness of the donor and acceptor fragments rather than to any energy considerations. The dataset was extracted from the protein data bank (PDB). The analysis was performed with an in-house software, hydrogen bond analysis tool (HBAT). In addition to strong hydrogen bonds such as O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O, the ubiquitous presence of weak hydrogen bonds such as C—H⋯O is implicated in molecular recognition. On an average, there are 1.4 weak hydrogen bonds for every strong hydrogen bond. For both categories of interaction, the N(3) of purine and the O(2) of pyrimidine are favoured acceptors. Donor multifurcation is common with the donors generally present in the drug molecules, and shared by hydrogen bond acceptors in the minor groove. Bifurcation and trifurcation are most commonly observed. The metrics for strong hydrogen bonds are consistent with established trends. The geometries are variable for weak hydrogen bonds. A database of recognition geometries for 26 literature amidinium-based inhibitors of Human African Trypanosomes (HAT) was generated with a docking study using seven inhibitors which occur in published crystal structures included in the list of 70 complexes mentioned above, and 19 inhibitors for which the drug-DNA complex crystal structures are unknown. The virtual geometries so generated correlate well with published activities for these 26 inhibitors, justifying our assumption that strong and weak hydrogen bonds are optimized in the active site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GA:

genetic algorithm

HAT:

Human African Trypanosomes

HBAT:

hydrogen bond analysis tool

MGB:

minor groove binder

NDB:

nucleic acid data bank

PDB:

protein data bank

RMSD:

root mean square deviation

TBG:

Trypanosoma brucei gambiense

TBR:

Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense

References

  • Aparna V, Rambabu G, Panigrahi S K, Sarma J A R P and Desiraju G R 2005 Virtual screening of 4-anilinoquinazoline analogs as EGFR kinase inhibitors: importance of hydrogen bonds in the evaluation of poses and scoring functions; J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 725–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Athri P, Wenzler T, Ruiz P, Brun R, Boykin D W, Tidwel R and Wilson W D 2006 3D QSAR on a library of heterocyclic diamidine derivatives with antiparasitic activity; Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 3144–3152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berman H M, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat T N, Weissig H, Shindyalov I N and Bourne P E 2000 The protein data bank; Nucleic Acid Res. 28 235–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boykin D W 2002 Antimicrobial activity of the DNA minor groove binders furamidine and analogs; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 13 763–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dervan P B 2001 Molecular recognition of DNA by small molecules; Bioorg. Med. Chem. 9 2215–2235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dervan P B and Edelson B S 2003 Recognition of the DNA minor groove by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13 284–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju G R and Steiner T 1999 The weak hydrogen bond in structural chemistry and biology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D A and Neidle S 2006 Virtual screening of DNA minor groove binders; J. Med. Chem. 49 4232–4238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren T 1996 Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterisation and performance of MMFF94; J. Comput. Chem. 17 490–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey G A 1997 Introduction to hydrogen bonding; (New York: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey G A and Saenger W 1991 Hydrogen bonding in biomolecules (Berlin: Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennard O 1993 DNA-drug interactions; Pure Appl. Chem. 65 1213–1222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy E R, Madsen E M, Lee M and Wilson W D 2003 Polyamide dimer stacking in the DNA minor groove and recognition of TC mismatched base pairs in DNA; in Small molecule DNA and RNA binders: from synthesis to nucleic acid complexes (eds) M Demeunynck, C Bailly and W D Wilson (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA) pp 387–413

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE Program, Version 2006–08 Chemical Computing Inc, Suite 910-1010 Sherbrooke St W, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2R7

  • Morávek Z, Neidle S and Schneider B 2002 Protein and drug interactions in the minor groove of DNA; Nucleic Acid Res. 30 1182–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neidle S 2001 DNA minor-groove recognition by small molecules; Nat. Prod. Rep. 18 291–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishio M, Hirota M and Umezawa Y 1998 The CH/p interaction. Evidence, nature, and consequences (New York: Wiley-VCH, Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi S K and Desiraju G R 2007 Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in the protein-ligand interface; Proteins 67 128–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pindur U, Jansen M and Lemster T 2005 Advances in DNA-ligands with groove binding, intercalating and/or alkylating activity: chemistry, DNA-binding and biology; Curr. Med. Chem. 12 2805–2847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohs R, Bloch I, Sklenar H and Shakked Z 2005 Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations; Nucleic Acid Res. 33 7048–7057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkhel S and Desiraju G R 2004 N-H—O, O-H—O, and C-H—O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition; Proteins 54 247–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seed J R and Boykin D W 2001 Chemotherapy of African trypanosomiasis; in World class parasites, Vol. 1, The African trypanosomes (eds) S Black and J R Seed (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers) pp 65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabernero L, Bella J and Alemán C 1996 Hydrogen bond geometry in DNA-minor groove binding drug complexes; Nucleic Acid Res. 24 3458–3466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell R R and Boykin D W 2003 Dicationic DNA minor groove binders as antimicrobial agents; in Small molecule DNA and RNA binders: from synthesis to nucleic acid complexes (eds) M Demeunynck, C Bailly and W D Wilson (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA) pp 414–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W D, Nguyen B, Tanious F A, Mathis A, Hall J E, Stephens C E and Boykin D W 2005 Dications that target the DNA minor groove: compound design and preparation, DNA interactions, cellular distribution and biological activity; Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agent 5 389–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam R. Desiraju.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panigrahi, S.K., Desiraju, G.R. Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in drug-DNA complexes: A statistical analysis. J Biosci 32, 677–691 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0068-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0068-2

Keywords

Navigation