Advertisement

Molecular Neurobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 1070–1081 | Cite as

Cannabidiol Induces Rapid and Sustained Antidepressant-Like Effects Through Increased BDNF Signaling and Synaptogenesis in the Prefrontal Cortex

  • Amanda J. Sales
  • Manoela V. Fogaça
  • Ariandra G. Sartim
  • Vitor S. Pereira
  • Gregers Wegener
  • Francisco S. Guimarães
  • Sâmia R. L. JocaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Currently available antidepressants have a substantial time lag to induce therapeutic response and a relatively low efficacy. The development of drugs that addresses these limitations is critical to improving public health. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic component of Cannabis sativa, is a promising compound since it shows large-spectrum therapeutic potential in preclinical models and humans. However, its antidepressant properties have not been completely investigated. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate in male rodents (i) whether CBD could induce rapid and sustained antidepressant-like effects after a single administration and (ii) whether such effects could be related to changes in synaptic proteins/function. Results showed that a single dose of CBD dose-dependently induced antidepressant-like effect (7–30 mg/kg) in Swiss mice submitted to the forced swim test (FST), 30 min (acute) or 7 days (sustained) following treatment. Similar effects were observed in the Flinders Sensitive and Flinders Resistant Line (FSL/FRL) rats and the learned helplessness (LH) paradigm using Wistar rats. The acute antidepressant effects (30 min) were associated with increased expression of synaptophysin and PSD95 in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and elevated BDNF levels in both mPFC and hippocampus (HPC). CBD also increased spine density in the mPFC after 30 min, but not 7 days later. Intracerebroventricular injection of the TrkB antagonist, K252a (0.05 nmol/μL), or the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin (1 nmol/μL), abolished the behavioral effects of CBD. These results indicate that CBD induces fast and sustained antidepressant-like effect in distinct animal models relevant for depression. These effects may be related to rapid changes in synaptic plasticity in the mPFC through activation of the BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway. The data support a promising therapeutic profile for CBD as a new fast-acting antidepressant drug.

Keywords

Cannabidiol Antidepressant BDNF Prefrontal cortex 

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a recurrent condition, being among the leading contributors to social and economic burden, affecting approximately 20% of the global population [1]. According to the World Health Organization, MDD is a leading cause of disability [2]. The current pharmacological treatment approaches indicate the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) as first-line medications [3, 4]. However, several weeks of treatment are needed to induce a therapeutic response, and up to 33% of the patients are considered treatment-resistant, failing to respond to two or more treatment attempts [5]. Also, the adherence of patients to these medicines is relatively low, as they cause several undesired side effects [6, 7].

In recent years, new fast-acting effective antidepressants have been proposed based on promising data from clinical and preclinical studies [8, 9]. Among them, ketamine, a mixed profile drug with high affinity for the NMDA-receptor, is the most studied [10]. Ketamine seems to disinhibit glutamate release, facilitating neuroplastic changes in several brain areas, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which in turn contributes to the restoration of the neuronal circuities altered in stress and depression [11]. Importantly, a single dose of ketamine rapidly increases both intra- and extracellular brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which could constitute part of its fast-acting antidepressant mechanism [12]. Stress and depression are associated to decreased BDNF levels and expression of its receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) in the hippocampus (HPC) [13, 14] and PFC [15, 16].

BDNF binds and activates TrkB receptors, triggering multiple intracellular signaling cascades (reviewed in [17, 18]), such as those regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), resulting in fast protein synthesis and synaptogenesis [19, 20, 21]. Therefore, the increase in BDNF levels induced by ketamine may activate TrkB-mTOR signaling, thereby contributing to its sustained antidepressant effects [17, 22].

Although ketamine is effective in reducing depressive symptoms, it produces psychotomimetic undesired effects, even in low doses [23]. In this sense, the discovery of new drugs that could act as rapid antidepressants without inducing significant side effects is of great importance. In this scenario, cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic cannabinoid present in the Cannabis sativa plant, seems to be a promising compound. It has shown therapeutic potential in different psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, schizophrenia, and epilepsy, with significant effects in humans and rodent models [24]. Importantly, antidepressant-like effects have been described for CBD in the forced swimming test, in the tail suspension test, and in the olfactory bulbectomy model [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. However, CBD antidepressant effects have not been tested in animal models with more appropriate face and construct validity. It also remains to be investigated if CBD can induce acute and sustained effects.

The mechanisms involved in CBD-induced psychotropic effects are not entirely understood. CBD activates 5-HT1A and peroxisome proliferator-activated (PPARγ) receptors [31, 32]. It can also facilitate endocannabinoid signaling through inhibition of the fatty acid amide hydrolase enzyme (FAAH) [33, 34]. Additionally, CBD increases BDNF and mTOR signaling in models of neurodegeneration [35, 36]. It is not known, however, if these mechanisms participate in CBD-induced antidepressant effects.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was, for the first time, to investigate whether (i) CBD could produce acute and sustained antidepressant-like effects in distinct animal models, and (ii) to assess whether such effects would involve facilitation of BDNF signaling and neuroplastic mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Swiss mice (25–30 g, 8 weeks) and male Wistar from the FMRP-USP Facility, Sprague-Dawley (SD) from Taconic (Copenhagen—Denmark), and Flinders Resistant (FRL) or Flinders Sensitive (FSL, 280–350 g) line rats from Translational Neuropsychiatry Unit—Aarhus University breeding colonies—were used to conduct the experiments. Mice were housed in groups of 10 animals per cage (1147 cm2). Wistar rats were housed individually (570 cm2), and SD, FRL, and FSL rats were housed in pairs. All animals were housed in temperature-controlled room (23 ± 2 °C) with a 12/12-h light-dark cycle (lights on 6:30 a.m./ lights off 6:30 p.m.). Food and water were available ad libitum throughout the study period. The total number of animals used in the present study was 367.

The protocols described in the present study were approved by the respective ethical committees (Danish National Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation (2012-15-3934-00254) and CETEA (no. 072/2014), and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.

Drugs and Reagents

Cannabidiol (CBD, THC Pharma, Germany, 7, 10, and 30 mg kg−1) was dissolved in Tween 80 (Synth, Brazil) 2% in sterile isotonic saline for systemic administration in mice and Wistar rats [25], or in an aqueous solution containing 30% of 1,2-Propyleneglycol (Riedel-de Haen, Germany) and 2.5% of ethanol (CCS Healthcare AB, Sweden) for systemic administration in SD, FRL, and FSL rats (according to pilot experiments). For intracerebral administration, CBD (50, 150, and 300 nmol/μL) was dissolved in grape fruit oil, as described in [29]. K252a (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 0.05 nmol uL−1; [37]) and S-Ketamine (Pfizer, IL, USA, 15 mg kg−1; [38]) were dissolved in sterile isotonic saline, and rapamycin (LC laboratories, MA, USA, 1 nmol μl−1) in DMSO [39]. When two drugs used in the same experiment had different vehicles, half of the animals in the final control group received administration of each vehicle group.

Experimental Design

Experiment 1—Evaluation of Acute and Sustained Effects Induced by CBD in Mice Submitted to the FST

After 2 h habituation in the experimental room, mice received intraperitoneal (ip) injections of CBD (7, 10, and 30 mg kg−1) or vehicle (10 mL kg−1) and were submitted to the FST 30 min later (acute effect). Independent groups of mice received ip injections of CBD (10 and 30 mg kg−1) or vehicle (10 mL kg−1) and were submitted to the FST 7 days later (sustained effect). Mice FST consisted of 6 min swimming session when animals were individually placed in glass cylinders (25 cm height, 17 cm diameter) containing 10 cm of water (25 °C), as described in [25, 40].

To investigate possible unspecific locomotor effects induced by CBD, the drug (10 mg kg−1) or its vehicle (10 mL kg−01) was administered intraperitoneally to independent groups of mice, which were submitted to the open field test, OFT, 30 min (acute effect) or 7 days later (sustained effect), as described in [25].

Experiment 2—Participation of Trk and mTOR Signaling Mechanisms in CBD Effects

Since TrkB and mTOR signaling have been implicated in mediating rapid and sustained antidepressant effect [17, 22], we investigated if CBD effects in the FST could involve the same signaling pathway. To do that, intracerebroventricular (icv) drug injections were performed with the aim to address: (1) the effects of direct injection of CBD into the CNS; (2) the effects induced by blockade of TrkB or mTOR upon CBD effects.

Therefore, mice underwent stereotaxic surgery to have guide-cannulas implanted into the lateral ventricle, as described in the supplementary material. The first experiment consisted of an icv injection of vehicle (1 μL) or CBD (50, 150, and 300 nmol μL−1). Thirty minutes later, mice were submitted to the OFT and, immediately after, to the FST, as previously described. In the second experiment, mice received a first icv injection of vehicle, K252a (0.05 nmol μL−1) or rapamycin (1 nmol μL−1) followed by a second injection (ip), 5 min later, of vehicle or CBD (10 mg kg−1). Thirty minutes after the systemic injection, the animals were individually submitted to the OFT (6 min) and then to the FST (6 min).

After the behavioral tests, animals were euthanized by decapitation preceded by ip administration of an anesthetic (chloral hydrate solution 5%, 0.1 mL/10 g, C2H3Cl3O2, VETEC, Brazil). Soon after, Evan’s blue dye (1 μL) was injected into the lateral ventricle as a marker. The injection sites were visually identified by dye spread over the ventricles. Animals that received injections outside the ventricle were excluded from statistical analysis.

Experiment 3—CBD Effects on BDNF and Synaptic Protein Levels

To investigate if CBD effects could be associated to rapid and/or sustained changes in BDNF and synaptic protein levels in the HPC and PFC, independent groups of animals received ip injections of CBD (10 mg kg−1) or vehicle (10 mL kg−1) and were submitted to the FST, 30 min or 7 days later. Immediately after the FST, the animals were deeply anesthetized with 5% chloral hydrate (1 mL kg−1, Sigma-Aldrich) and decapitated. The HPC and PFC were dissected for further analysis of BDNF levels by ELISA or PSD95 and SYP by WB, as detailed in the supplementary material.

Experiment 4—CBD Effects on the Number of Dendritic Spines in Mice

To investigate if CBD effects could be associated with rapid and/or sustained changes in the number of dendritic spines in the PFC and HPC, independent groups of animals received ip injections of CBD (10 mg kg−1) or vehicle (10 mL kg−1), and 30 min or 7 days later, were submitted to the FST. Immediately after or 7 days later, the animals were sacrificed, and their brain removed for further processing with the Golgi-Cox method. The procedure was performed using the FD Rapid Golgi Stain Kit (FD Neurotechnologies, USA) according to fabricant’s recommendations, with detailed protocol in supplementary material. The number of spines in 10 μm of secondary and tertiary apical dendrites located into the dentate gyrus of the HPC and in the PFC (layer II/III) was analyzed using a light microscope (Zeiss, Germany). An analyzer blind to the experimental conditions measured six to eight neurons per animal distributed over defined plans according to Paxinos and Franklin Atlas [41], complying with the following criteria: the neurons were relatively isolated, displayed a defined cell body and a complete dendritic tree evidenced by well-defined endings, and presented intact primary, secondary, and tertiary branches.

Experiment 5—Acute and Sustained Effect of CBD in Rats Submitted to Different Preclinical Models

To further substantiate the acute and sustained behavioral effects induced by CBD, we used two different animal models: a stress-based animal model (learned helplessness, LH) and an animal model based on selective breeding (FRL/FRL combined with FST).

The learned helplessness paradigm was performed as previously described [42], with further details in the supplementary material. On day 1, rats were submitted to a pretest session (PT) with 40 inescapable electric foot shocks (0.4 mA, 10 s duration; PT: stressed group) and, on the 7th day, they were submitted to the test (T, 30 escapable foot shocks, 0.4 mA, 10 s duration, 30–90 s interval) preceded by a tone (60 dB, 670 Hz) that started 5 s before each shock and lasted until its end. Animals could avoid the shock during the sound presentation or interrupt its presentation (escape) by crossing to opposite side of the chamber. The absence of this behavior was considered an escape failure. It is well-documented that PT exposure increases, whereas antidepressants decrease, the number of escape failures in this paradigm [43]. To investigate CBD effects, rats received a single injection of CBD (10 and 30 mg kg−1) or vehicle (10 mL kg−1) in one of the following periods: immediately after or 24 h after PT, or on day 7 (1 h before the test).

To evaluate CBD effects in FRL/FSL, we first tested CBD in Sprague-Dawley rats, the strain background from which FRL and FSL animals were developed [44]. We also included ketamine as a positive control for the acute and sustained effects [38]. The animals were exposed to the PT and T sessions of the forced swim as described earlier [38, 45]. One hour before the T, they received an ip injection of ketamine (15 mg kg−1), CBD (10 and 30 mg kg−1) or vehicle. Locomotor activity was assessed in the OFT immediately before the FST. After 7 days, rats were re-exposed to the test session of FST. FRL and FSL animals were exposed only to the test session of forced swim, as previously described [44]. One hour after the administration of ketamine (15 mg kg−1), CBD (10 and 30 mg kg−1) or vehicle, the animals were exposed to the OFT. Immediately after the OFT, the animals were submitted to the FST (acute effect). After 7 days, the rats were re-exposed to the test session of the FST (sustained effect).

In rats, OFT was carried out in a squared arena (100 cm × 100 cm × 40 cm high), in a dimly lit (10 lx), temperature-controlled room (24 ± 1 °C). The experiment was videotaped, and the total distance traveled was analyzed using Ethovision XT 11 software (Noldus Information Technology).

Statistical Analysis

Analyses of the FST and LH data were performed using one-way ANOVA (post-test: Dunnett). Repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA was used to compare the number of crossings in OFT, and unpaired t test was used for the molecular data. The GraphPad Prism 5.0 software was used for statistical analyses. A 95% confidence interval and a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) were considered for all analyses.

Results

CBD Induces Acute and Sustained Antidepressant-Like Effects in the Mice FST

CBD treatments significantly reduced the immobility time, 30 min (F3,23 = 3.871, p < 0.05, Fig. 1a) and 7 days (F2,18 = 5.910, p < 0.05; Fig. 1b) after its single administration (10 mg kg−1), thus revealing acute and sustained antidepressant-like effect, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1c, CBD (10 mg kg−1) did not induce any significant difference in the number of crossings in the OFT when compared to vehicle (RM-ANOVA; interaction, F10,75 = 5.15, p > 0.05; treatment, F2,75 = 0.2862, p > 0.05; time, F5,75 = 0.8006, p < 0.05), which excluded possible unspecific effects of CBD on locomotor activity.
Fig. 1

Acute and sustained effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in the mice forced swimming test (FST) and open field test (OFT). a Acutely, CBD treatment reduced immobility time (IT) in FST (n = 6–7 mice per group). b The IT was reduced in FST 7 days after CBD treatment (n = 7 mice per group). c The number of crossings did not differ between treatment groups (n = 6 mice per group). The data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to vehicle (VEH) mice

Participation of TrkB Receptors and mTOR Signaling in CBD-Induced Effects

CBD significantly decreased the immobility time in the FST after icv administration (Fig. 2a; 300 nmol/μL; one-way ANOVA, F3,24 = 7.219, p < 0.05), without changing the number of crossings in the OFT (Fig. 2b; RM-ANOVA; interaction, F9,66 = 1.49, p > 0.05; treatment, F3,66 = 1.605, p > 0.05; time, F3,66 = 4.813, p < 0.05). Next, we analyzed if CBD effects could be blocked by a TrKB receptor antagonist (K252a) or by an mTOR signaling inhibitor (rapamycin). As shown in Fig. 2c, d, systemic CBD administration reduced the immobility time in the FST (one-way ANOVA, F5,29 = 8.699, p < 0.05), which was blocked by icv K252a or rapamycin administration (Fig. 2c; p > 0.05 compared to the vehicle group). In the OFT, CBD did not change the number of crossings (Fig. 2d; treatment, F5,84 = 0.5770, p > 0.05; interaction, F15,84 = 0.3906, p > 0.05). Therefore, systemic effects of CBD are dependent on intact TrkB and mTOR signaling in the CNS.
Fig. 2

Trk and mTOR blockade impair cannabidiol (CBD) effects in the forced swimming test (FST). a CBD treatment (icv) reduced immobility time (IT) in FST, when compared to vehicle (VEH) (n = 6–8 mice per group). b The number of crossings did not differ between treatment groups (n = 6–8 mice per group). c The inhibition of mTOR (Rapamycin, Rapam) and blockade of TrK (K252) prevented the reduction in IT in FST induced by CBD administration (n = 5–7 mice per group). d The number of crossings did not differ between treatment groups (n = 5–6 mice per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to VEH mice

CBD Effects on BDNF and Synaptic Protein Levels

CBD administration (10 mg kg−1) acutely increased BDNF levels in both the HPC and PFC (Fig. 3a; p < 0.05; t16 = 3.535; and t17 = 2.277, respectively), but this effect was not detected 7 days later (Fig. 3b; p > 0.05, HPC, t16 = 1.874 and PFC, t18 = 0.799). On the other hand, 7 days after the CBD administration, the synaptic protein (PSD95 and SYP) expression was increased only in the PFC (Fig. 3d; p < 0.05; t14 = 3.915; and t14 = 2.761, respectively). No change was found in the HPC (Fig. 3e; p > 0.05; PSD95, t12 = 1.876 and SYP, t11 = 1.767). These results are consistent with a rapid increase in BDNF levels in the HPC and PFC, associated with a delayed increase in synaptic proteins in the PFC, in response to a single CBD injection.
Fig. 3

Levels of BDNF, mTOR, and synaptic proteins in CBD-treated mice submitted to forced swimming test (FST). a Acutely, BDNF levels are increased in hippocampus (HPC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) of mice treated with CBD (n = 9–10 animals per group). b Seven days after CBD administration, BDNF levels are not changed (n = 9–10 mice per group). c Experimental scheme for WB of synaptic proteins. d CBD treatment increased synaptic proteins levels in PFC (n = 8 mice per group). e CBD treatment did not change synaptic proteins levels in HPC (n = 6–8 mice per group). The data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to VEH mice

CBD Rapidly Increases the Number of Dendritic Spines

To investigate if dendritic remodeling would be associated with the behavioral and molecular effects induced by CBD, we analyzed the number of dendritic spines in the PFC and HPC, 30 min and 7 days after drug injection. Acute administration of CBD increased the number of dendritic spines in both prelimbic and infralimbic areas of the medial PFC (Fig. 4a, b; prelimbic PFC: secondary branch, t8 = 2.688; tertiary branch, t8 = 2.636; infralimbic PFC: secondary branch, t8 = 2.322; tertiary branch, t8 = 2.814; p < 0.05 for all). However, no difference was found 7 days later (Fig. 4c, d; prelimbic PFC: secondary branch, t6 = 0.7769; tertiary branch, t6 = 0.9873; infralimbic PFC: secondary branch, t6 = 1.666; tertiary branch, t6 = 0.2708; p > 0.05 for all). Also, CBD did not change the number of dendritic spines in the dorsal HPC (dentate gyrus) when compared to the vehicle group at any time of analysis (p > 0.05; Fig. 4e, 30 min after the injection: secondary branch, t8 = 0.1136; tertiary branch, t8 = 0.4951; Fig. 4f, 7 days after the injection: secondary branch, t8 = 1.668; tertiary branch, t8 = 0.01073).
Fig. 4

Effect of cannabidiol (CBD) or vehicle (VEH) administration in dendritic spines number. a Experimental scheme for acute treatment. In prefrontal cortex (PFC), acute CBD treatment (ip) increased dendritic spine number in prelimbic (PL; b) and infralimbic (IL; c) regions (n = 5 mice per group). e Experimental scheme for sustained treatment. Seven days after CBD injection (ip), the number of dendritic spines did not change in PFC (PL and IL, f, g, respectively; n = 4 mice per group). In hippocampus (dentate gyrus (DG)), systemic CBD administration did not change the dendritic spines number (acute, d; 7 days, h; n = 5 mice per group). The data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to VEH mice

Acute and Sustained Effects of CBD in Rats Submitted to Different Preclinical Models

To better support our findings regarding the rapid and sustained effects induced by CBD in the FST, we analyzed its effects in two different animal models sensitive to antidepressant drugs, the learned helplessness and the FSL animals. One-way ANOVA showed that administration of CBD immediately after PT, but not 1 h before T, reduced the number of escape failures (Fig.5a; one-way ANOVA, F4,47 = 2.818, p < 0.05) and increased the number of escapes (Fig. 5b; F4,47 = 2.134), without changing the number of crossings (Fig. 5c; F4,47 = 1.681, p > 0.05). These data are indicative of a rapid antidepressant-like effect of CBD since the LH is irresponsible to acute (single) treatment with conventional antidepressants.
Fig. 5

Effect of cannabidiol (CBD) or vehicle (VEH) administration in different animal models. In learned helplessness (LH), acute CBD treatment (ip) induced sustained reduction in number of failures (a), increase in the number of escape (b), and did not change the number of crossings (c; n = 10–13 rats per group). In Sprague-Dawley rats, CBD and ketamine (ket) treatment reduced the immobility time in forced swimming test (FST; d; n = 6–7 rats per group) and did not change the number of crossing in open field test (OFT; e; n = 6–7 rats per group). f Injection of CBD and ket in FSL rats reduced the immobility time in FST (n = 4–8 per group). g The re-exposition of FSL rats treated with CBD to the FST did not change immobility time (n = 4–8 per group). h The traveled distance did not differ between treatment groups (n = 4–8 rats per group). The data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to VEH mice; #p < 0.05 compared to the VEH mice; @p < 0.05 compared VEH FRL X VEH FSL

In Sprague-Dawley rats, the control animals of FRL and FSL rats, the injection of CBD at the dose of 30 mg kg−1 significantly reduced the immobility time in FST (Fig. 5d; F3,23 = 3.348, p < 0.05). The same effect was found to the positive-control ketamine (Fig. 5d; t11 = 2.732, p < 0.05). Neither ketamine nor CBD modified the exploratory activity of the animals in the OFT (Fig. 5e; F2,23 = 1178, p > 0.05). Similarly, as shown in fig. 5f, g, CBD (10 and 30 mg kg−1) and ketamine (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced the immobility time in FSL rats (Fig. 5f; F3,25 = 8.441, p < 0.05). When the animals were re-exposed to FST, the groups treated with CBD did not show any change in the immobility time (Fig. 5g; F3,24 = 3873, p > 0.05) whereas this effect was still significant to the positive-control ketamine (Fig. 5g; t12 = 2.941, p < 0.05). In FRL rats, injection of CBD and ketamine did not reduce the immobility time in FST (Fig. 5g; F3,22 = 1.085, p > 0.05). Seven days after, the animals were re-exposed to the FST and CBD reduced the immobility significantly. (Figure 5h; t13 = 2.689, p < 0.05). Neither ketamine or CBD modified the exploratory activity of the animals in the OFT (Fig. 5;h FSL, F3,28 = 0.0965; FRL; F3,22 = 0.3544, p > 0.05 for both).

Discussion

The main finding of the present study is that CBD induces not only a robust acute, but also sustained, antidepressant-like effect in different species and distinct animal models involving stress exposure (FST, LH) and selective breeding (FSL/FRL). The rapid effect was accompanied by increased BDNF levels in the HPC and mPFC, and markers of synaptic plasticity in the mPFC. Moreover, CBD effect was blocked by icv injection of TrkB receptor antagonist or mTOR inhibitor. Additionally, the sustained effects of CBD were accompanied by increases in PSD95 and SYP expression in the PFC, without any change in the number of dendritic spines. Altogether, our results suggest that the rapid antidepressant-like effect induced by acute CBD injection involves BDNF/TrkB/mTOR signaling and increased dendritic spine density in the medial PFC, whereas the long-lasting effect may be associated with an enhancement of synaptic function in this same brain area.

The behavioral effects of CBD observed herein agree with previous reports describing its antidepressant-like effects [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. For instance, systemic CBD treatment reduced the immobility time in mice submitted to the FST [25, 26, 27] and the tail suspension test (TST; [30]). In another study, CBD attenuated the behavioral deficits induced by olfactory bulbectomy within 24 h, indicating a similar fast-acting antidepressant profile [28]. Chronic treatment with CBD was also effective in animals subjected to chronic unpredictable stress [46]. Interestingly, a recent study showed that CBD induces a pro-hedonic effect in the saccharin preference test in the Wistar-Kyoto, a genetic rat model of depression [47]. This finding is in full accordance with our observation that CBD produced an antidepressant-like effect in the FSL/FRL rats, another genetic rat model of depression based on selective breeding [44].

Since fast-acting antidepressants, such as ketamine, Glyx-13 (NMDA receptor partial agonist), and scopolamine (muscarinic receptor antagonist), induce behavioral effects through rapid BDNF-mediated signaling and increased synaptogenesis in the PFC [11, 48, 49], we hypothesized that this mechanism is essential for the behavioral effects induced by CBD. BDNF is recognized as playing important roles in neuronal survival, differentiation, outgrowth, and synaptogenesis, during development and in the adult brain (for review see [55]). Stress exposure is able to negatively change BDNF levels whereas the behavioral effect of fast-acting antidepressants has been related to the rapid and long-lasting increases in synaptogenesis in response to increased BDNF levels in PFC [56, 57]. In the hippocampus, Garcia and coworkers demonstrated that 1 h after one single injection of ketamine also increases BDNF levels [58]. Moreover, the fast-acting behavioral antidepressant-like effects induced by ketamine and other NMDA antagonist in mouse models was shown to be dependent on the rapid synthesis of BDNF due to de-repression of its translation in the hippocampus [59]. Therefore, BDNF signaling in both PFC and hippocampus seems to play an important role the behavioral effect induced by fast-acting antidepressants.

Supporting our initial hypothesis, acute administration of CBD (10 mg kg−1) rapidly increased BDNF levels in both mPFC and HPC, an effect not observed 7 days later. Since icv administration of k252a (Trk antagonist) or rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor) blocked the behavioral effect induced by systemic CBD administration, it is probable that the fast antidepressant-like effect of CBD depends on intact BDNF-TrkB-mTOR signaling in the brain. In support of our data, repeated CBD treatment increased BNDF and mTOR levels in the spinal cord [35] and brain of rodents exposed to models of neurodegeneration [36]. In contrast, unaltered BDNF levels in the PFC and HPC after acute CBD administration have also been reported [25, 27]. However, differences in the age and species used or CBD dose (30 vs. 10 mg kg−1; [25]) might have contributed to the contradictory findings. Based on the present study, we suggest that CBD can rapidly increase BDNF levels in the PFC and HPC, an effect associated with its behavioral effects in the FST. The rapid upregulation of BDNF protein and subsequent activation of its receptor, TrkB, could trigger several intracellular signaling pathways that ultimately lead to mTOR activation (see [22]), which mediates protein synthesis and synaptogenesis.

The mechanism responsible for CBD effects resulting in increased BDNF and mTOR signaling are not yet clear. It is known, however, that CBD increases serotonin levels in the PFC [28] and that administration of CBD into the same brain region induces antidepressant-like effects that are dependent on local 5-HT1A activation [29]. Evidence indicates that treatment with 5-HT1A agonists rapidly increases BDNF mRNA and protein levels in PFC and hippocampus [60] and in cultured neurons [61]. Moreover, decreased BDNF levels and TrkB activation are described in the brain of 5-HT1A knockout mice [62], thus suggesting that proper 5-HT1A activation positively regulates BDNF levels in the brain. This mechanism seems to participate in the behavioral effect of fast-acting antidepressants, since activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the medial PFC was shown to induce acute and sustained antidepressant-like and the sustained effect induced by systemic injection of ketamine was attenuated by intra-medial PFC injection of a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY100635. Altogether, it is possible to suggest that 5-HT1A activation by CBD, either by direct binding or by indirect increase in serotonin levels, can lead to increased BDNF levels and TrkB activation, which would ultimately lead mTOR activation and synaptogenesis, as we observed herein. This hypothesis, however, warrants further investigation.

Alternatively, recent evidence indicates that chronic CBD treatment induces behavioral and neuroplastic effects in stressed animals due to a facilitation of endocannabinoid neurotransmission and consequent CB1/CB2 receptor activation, which could recruit intracellular/synaptic proteins involved in neurogenesis and dendritic remodeling [63]. It remains to be investigated if this could participate in acute and sustained effects induced by the drug.

Based on the findings about BDNF and mTOR involvement in CBD effects, we further investigated if CBD effects would also be associated with increased levels of synaptic proteins and dendritic spines, since chronic antidepressant treatment prevents or reverses dendritic spine alterations caused by stress [50, 51]. In addition, drugs with a fast-acting antidepressant effect, such as ketamine, rapidly increase the number of dendritic spines in the PFC and reverse the effects of chronic stress via increased BDNF regulation of synaptic protein synthesis [39, 52]. Our data indicate that CBD increases the number of dendritic spines in the medial PFC (PL and IL) 30 min after the administration. Although we did not observe this effect 7 days later, there was an increase of PSD95 and SYP in the PFC, suggesting an enhancement of dendritic function. One possible explanation for the discrepant results in the number of dendritic pines and synaptic proteins at 30 min and 7 days after CBD administration could rely on the fact that CBD would actually rapidly favor synaptogenesis to substantiate an activity-driven selection of the appropriate synaptic contacts, thus allowing dendrite turnover to take place [64]. Therefore, the number of dendrites would not be increased after 7 days, only increased synaptic function as revealed by increased SYP and PSD95.

Supporting our data, depressed subjects present reduced PSD95 levels in the PFC, which is reversed by ketamine [53]. Additionally, administration of rapamycin (icv and intra-mPFC) blocks the antidepressant behavioral effects and the increase in dendritic spines induced by ketamine [39]. Similarly, icv rapamycin administration blocked CBD-induced behavioral effects in the present study. Altogether, these results suggest that CBD induces fast effects on dendritic remodeling in the mPFC, possibly involving BDNF-mediated signaling. On the other hand, its sustained effect could rely on increased synaptogenesis in the same brain region. Experiments specifically targeting the mPFC or the HPC could help clarifying the differential involvement of these two brain regions in CBD-induced effects.

Finally, to further substantiate our behavioral findings in the FST, we investigated CBD effects in two different animal models with higher face, construct, and predictive validity, the learned helplessness and FRL/FSL animals. Both models fail to respond to the acute effects of conventional antidepressants, but they positively identify the acute antidepressant effect of ketamine [20, 44]. In our study, a single injection of CBD reduced the number of escape failures in the LH and the immobility time in the FSL animals. Additionally, the effects in the LH and FRL animals were present 7 days after the first injection. These results further support the proposal that CBD possesses fast-acting antidepressant properties. The use of more than one behavioral test can provide convergent validity and increase confidence in studies aimed at identifying new fast-acting antidepressant drugs [54]. Nevertheless, the fact that all molecular analysis was performed with brain tissue from only one species (mice) submitted to the forced swimming test remains a limitation of the present study. Further analysis using different animal models and treatment intervals could reveal new important information about CBD effects.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CBD induces a rapid antidepressant effect, probably by increasing BDNF signaling in the PFC and synaptic dendritic spine density. Moreover, a long-lasting enhancement of synaptic efficacy could mediate CBD-sustained antidepressant effects.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Flávia Fiacadori Salata and Per Fuglsang Mikkelsen for their helpful technical assistance.

Funding and Disclosure

This work was supported by research grants from the Research Foundation of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP, A.J.S., grant number 2015/01955-0;2012/17626-7); the National Council of Science and Technology, Brazil (CNPq) and National Institute of Science and Translational Medicine (CNPq, 465458/2014-9); the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); and Aarhus University Research Foundation (AU-UDEAS initiative: eMOOD). Gregers Wegener reported having received lecture/consultancy fees from H. Lundbeck A/S, Servier SA, Astra Zeneca AB, Eli Lilly A/S, Sun Pharma Pty Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Shire A/S, HB Pharma A/S, Arla Foods A.m.b.A., Alkermes Inc., and Mundipharma International Ltd.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12035_2018_1143_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R (2018) Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 3:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Depression. website http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/.
  3. 3.
    Cleare A, Pariante CM, Young AH, Anderson IM, Christmas D, Cowen PJ, Dickens C, Ferrier IN et al (2015) Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines. J Psychopharmacol 29(5):459–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer M, Severus E, Köhler S, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Möller H (2015) World federation of societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care. World J Biol Psychiatry 16:76–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shelton RC, Osuntokun O, Heinloth AN, Corya SA (2010) Therapeutic options for treatment-resistant depression. CNS Drugs 24(2):131–161.  https://doi.org/10.2165/11530280-000000000-00000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dodd S, Mitchell PB, Bauer M, Yatham L, Allan H, Kennedy SH et al (2017) Monitoring for antidepressant-associated adverse events in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder: an international consensus statement. World J Biol Psychiatry 6:1–19Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho SC, Jacob SA, Tangiisuran B (2017) Barriers and facilitators of adherence to antidepressants among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a qualitative study. PLoS One 12(6):e0179290.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179290. eCollection 2017
  8. 8.
    Agid Y, Buzsáki G, Diamond DM, Frackowiak R, Giedd J, Girault J et al (2007) How can drug discovery for psychiatric disorders be improved? Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:189–201.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duman RS, Heninger GR, Nestler EJ (1997) A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54(7):597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zarate CA Jr, Niciu MJ (2015) Ketamine for depression: evidence, challenges and promise. World Psychiatry 14(3):348–350. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20269.
  11. 11.
    Ghosal S, Hare BD, Duman RS (2017) Prefrontal cortex GABAergic deficits and circuit dysfunction in the pathophysiology and treatment of chronic stress and depression. Curr Opin Behav Sci 14:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harmer CJ, Duman RS, Cowen PJ (2017) How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. Lancet Psychiatry 366:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30015-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castrén E, Rantamäki T (2010) The role of BDNF and its receptors in depression and antidepressant drug action: reactivation of developmental plasticity. Dev Neurobiol 70(5):289–297.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20758 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu H, Chen ZY (2011) The role of BDNF in depression on the basis of its location in the neural circuitry. Acta Pharmacol Sin 32:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2010.184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castrén E (2004) Neurotrophic effects of antidepressant drugs. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4:58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2003.10.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pandey GN, Ren X, Rizavi HS, Conley RR, Roberts RC, Dwivedi Y (2008) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and tyrosine kinase B receptor signalling in post-mortem brain of teenage suicide victims. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11(8):1047–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145708009000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Autry AE, Monteggia LM (2012) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rev 64(2):238–258.  https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park H, Poo M (2013) Neurotrophin regulation of neural circuit development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 14(1):7–23.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3379 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ardalan M, Wegener G, Polsinelli B, Madsen TM, Nyengaard JR (2016) Neurovascular plasticity of the hippocampus one week after a single dose of ketamine in genetic rat model of depression. Hippocampus 26(11):1414–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22617 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ardalan M, Rafati AH, Nyengaard JR, Wegener G (2017a) Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine correlates with astroglial plasticity in the hippocampus. Br J Pharmacol 174(6):483–492.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13714 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ardalan M, Wegener G, Rafati AH, Nyengaard JR (2017b) S-Ketamine rapidly reverses synaptic and vascular deficits of hippocampus in genetic animal model of depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 20(3):247–256.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bjorkholm C, Monteggia LM (2016) BDNF e a key transducer of antidepressant effects. Neuropharmacology 102:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang Y, Wang Y, Sun X, Lian B, Sun H, Wang G, du Z, Li Q et al (2017) Short- and long-term antidepressant effects of ketamine in a rat chronic unpredictable stress model. Brain Behav 7(8):e00749.  https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.749 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Campos AC, Fogaça MV, Scarante FF, Joca SRL, Sales AJ, Gomes FV, Sonego AB, Rodrigues NS, Galve-Roperh I, Guimarães FS (2017) Plastic and neuroprotective mechanisms involved in the therapeutic effects of cannabidiol in psychiatric disorders. Front Pharmacol 23;8:269. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00269.
  25. 25.
    Zanelati T, Biojone C, Moreira F, Guimarães FS, Joca S (2010) Antidepressant-like effects of cannabidiol in mice: possible involvement of 5-HT 1A receptors. Br J Pharmacol 159:122–128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00521.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    El-alfy AT, Ivey K, Robinson K, Ahmed S, Radwan M, Slade D et al (2010) Antidepressant-like effect of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids isolated from Cannabis sativa L. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 95:434–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2010.03.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Réus GZ, Stringari RB, Ribeiro KF, Luft T, Abelaira HM, Fries GR, Aguiar BW, Kapczinski F et al (2011) Administration of cannabidiol and imipramine induces antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming test and increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in the rat amygdala. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 23:241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5215.2011.00579.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Linge R, Jiménez-Sánches L, Campa L, Pilar-Cuéllar F, Vidal R, Pazos A et al (2016) Cannabidiol induces rapid-acting antidepressant-like effects and enhances cortical 5-HT/glutamate neurotransmission: role of 5-HT 1A receptors. Neuropharmacology 103:16–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.12.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sartim AG, Guimarães FS, Joca SRL (2016) Antidepressant-like effect of cannabidiol injection into the ventral medial prefrontal cortex—possible involvement of 5-HT1A and CB1 receptors. Behav Brain Res 303:218–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schiavon A, Bonato J, Milani H, Guimarães F, Maria R, Weffort De Oliveira R (2016) Influence of single and repeated cannabidiol administration on emotional behavior and markers of cell proliferation and neurogenesis in non-stressed mice. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 64:27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Esposito G, Scuderi C, Valenza M, Togna GI, Latina V, De Filippis D, Cipriano M, Carratù MR et al (2011) Cannabidiol reduces Aβ-induced neuroinflammation and promotes hippocampal neurogenesis through PPARγ involvement. PLoS One 6(12):e28668.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028668 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Russo EB, Burnett A, Hall B, Parker KK (2005) Agonistic properties of cannabidiol at 5-HT1a receptors. Neurochem Res 30(8):1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L, Tchilibon S, Ponde DE, Brandi I et al (2001) Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. Br J Pharmacol 134(4):845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leweke F, Piomelli D, Muhi D, Gerth C, Hoyer C, Klosterkötter J et al (2012) Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 20(2):e94.  https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2012.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giacoppo S, Pollastro F, Grassi G, Bramanti P, Mazzon E (2017) Target regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway by cannabidiol in treatment of experimental multiple sclerosis. Fitoterapia 116:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2016.11.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mori MA, Meyer E, Soares LM, Milani H, Guimarães FS, de Oliveira RM (2017) Cannabidiol reduces neuroinfammation and promotes neuroplasticity and functional recovery after brain ischemia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol Psychiatry 3(75):94–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Casarotto PC, de Bortoli VC, Corrêa FM, Resstel LB, Zangrossi H Jr (2010) Panicolytic-like effect of BDNF in the rat dorsal periaqueductal grey matter: the role of 5-HT and GABA. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13(5):573–582.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S146114570999112X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liebenberg N, Joca S, Wegener G (2015) Nitric oxide involvement in the antidepressant-like effect of ketamine in the Flinders sensitive line rat model of depression. Acta Neuropsychiatr 27(2):90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2014.39 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, Banasr M, Dwyer JM, Iwata M, Li XY, Aghajanian G et al (2010) mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science 329(5994):959–964.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190287 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Porsolt RD, Bertin A, Jalfre M (1977) Behavioral despair in mice: a primary screening test for antidepressants. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 229(2):327–336PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2. San Diego: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2004.00264.x.
  42. 42.
    Joca SR, Zanelati T, Guimarães FS (2006) Post-stress facilitation of serotonergic, but not noradrenergic, neurotransmission in the dorsal hippocampus prevents learned helplessness development in rats. Brain Res 1087(1):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maier SF, Seligman ME (2016) Learned helplessness at fifty: insights from neuroscience. Psychol Rev 123(4):349–367.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Overstreet DH, Wegener G (2013) The flinders sensitive line rat model of depression—25 years and still producing. Pharmacol Rev 65(1):143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005397 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pereira VS, Romano A, Wegener G, Joca SR (2015) Antidepressant-like effects induced by NMDA receptor blockade and NO synthesis inhibition in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex of rats exposed to the forced swim test. Psychopharmacology 232(13):2263–2273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3853-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Campos AC, Ortega Z, Palazuelos J, Fogaça MV, Aguiar DC, Díaz-Alonso J, Ortega-Gutiérrez S, Vázquez-Villa H et al (2013) The anxiolytic effect of cannabidiol on chronically stressed mice depends on hippocampal neurogenesis: involvement of the endocannabinoid system. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 16(6):1407–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145712001502 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shoval G, Shbiro L, Hershkovitz L, Hazut N, Zalsman G, Mechoulam R, Weller A (2016) Prohedonic effect of cannabidiol in a rat model of depression. Neuropsychobiology 73(2):123–129.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000443890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu RJ, Lee FS, Li XY, Bambico F, Duman RS, Aghajanian GK (2012) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met allele impairs basal and ketamine-stimulated synaptogenesis in prefrontal cortex. Biol Psychiatry 71(11):996–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu RJ, Duman C, Kato T, Hare B, Lopresto D, Bang E et al (2017) GLYX-13 produces rapid antidepressant responses with key synaptic and behavioral effects distinct from ketamine. Neuropharmacology 42:1231–1242.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ampuero E, Rubio FJ, Falcon R, Sandoval M, Diaz-Veliz G, Gonzalez RE, Earle N, Dagnino-Subiabre A et al (2010) Chronic fluoxetine treatment induces structural plasticity and selective changes in glutamate receptor subunits in the rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience 169(1):98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    O’Leary OF, Wu X, Castren E (2009) Chronic fluoxetine treatment increases expression of synaptic proteins in the hippocampus of the ovariectomized rat: role of BDNF signalling. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34(3):367–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.09.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li N, Liu RJ, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Lee B, Son H, Li XY, Aghajanian G et al (2011) Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry 69(8):754–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Feyissa AM, Chandran A, Stockmeier CA, Karolewicz B (2009) Reduced levels of NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDA receptor and PSD-95 in the prefrontalcortex in major depression. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33(1):70–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ramaker MJ, Dulawa SC (2017) Identifying fast-onset antidepressants using rodent models. Mol Psychiatry 22(5):656–665.  https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.36 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kowianski P, Lietzau G, Czuba E, Waskow M, Steliga A, Morys J (2018) BDNF: a key factor with multipotent impact on brain signaling and synaptic plasticity. Cell Mol Neurobiol 38(3):579–593.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-017-0510-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taniguchi N, Shinoda Y, Takei N, Nawa H, Ogura A, Tominaga-Yoshino K (2006) Possible involvement of BDNF release in long-lasting synapse formation induced by repetitive PKA activation. Neurosci Lett. 2;406(1–2):38–42.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ghosal S, Bang E, Yue W, Hare BD, Lepack AE, Girgenti MJ, Duman RS (2018) Activity-dependent brain-derived neurotrophic factor release is required for the rapid antidepressant actions of scopolamine. Biol Psychiatry 1 83(1):29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Garcia LS, Comim CM, Valvassori SS, Réus GZ, Barbosa LM, Andreazza AC, Stertz L, Fries GR et al (2008) Acute administration of ketamine induces antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming test and increases BDNF levels in the rat hippocampus. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1 32(1):140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Autry AE, Adachi M, Nosyreva E, Na ES, Los MF, Cheng PF, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM (2011) NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature 15; 475(7354):91–95. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10130.
  60. 60.
    Jiang DG, Jin SL, Li GY, Li QQ, Li ZR, Ma HX, Zhuo CJ, Jiang RH et al (2016) Serotonin regulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in select brain regions during acute psychological stress. Neural Regen Res 11(9):1471–1479PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yoshimura Y, Ishikawa C, Kasegai H, Masuda T, Yoshikawa M, Shiga T (2017) Roles of 5-HT1A receptor in the expression of AMPA receptor and BDNF in developing mouse cortical neurons. Neurosci Res 115:13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2016.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wu YC, Hill RA, Klug M, van den Buuse M (2012) Sex-specific and region-specific changes in BDNF-TrkB signaling in the hippocampus of 5-HT1A receptor and BDNF single and double mutant mice. Brain Res 3(1452):10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fogaça MV, Campos AC, Coelho LD, Duman RS, Guimarães FS (2018) The anxiolytic effects of cannabidiol in chronically stressed mice are mediated by the endocannabinoid system: role of neurogenesis and dendritic remodeling. Neuropharmacology 3(135):22–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Diniz CRAF, Casarotto PC, Resstel L, Joca SRL (2018) Beyond good and evil: a putative continuum-sorting hypothesis for the functional role of proBDNF/BDNF-propeptide/mBDNF in antidepressant treatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 4(90):70–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão PretoUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão PretoUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Translational Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus University HospitalRisskovDenmark
  4. 4.Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences (NAPNA)University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations