Abstract
The most prominent hallmark of prion diseases is prion protein conversion and the subsequent deposition of the altered prions, PrPSc, at the pathological sites of affected individuals, particularly in the brain. A previous study has demonstrated that the N-terminus of the pathogenic prion isoform (PrPSc) is modified with advanced glycation end products (AGEs), most likely at one or more of the three Lys residues (positions 23, 24, and 27) in the N-terminus (23KKRPKP28). The current study investigated whether Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), a major AGE form specific to Lys residues produced by nonenzymatic glycation, is an AGE adduct of the N-terminus of PrPSc. We show that CML is linked to at least one Lys residue at the N-terminus of PrPSc in 263K prion-infected hamster brains and at least one of the eight Lys residues (positions 101, 104, 106, 110, 185, 194, 204, and 220) in the proteinase K (PK)-resistant core region of PrPSc. The nonenzymatic glycation of the Lys residue(s) of PrPSc with CML likely occurs in the widespread prion-deposit areas within infected brains, particularly in some of the numerous tyrosine hydroxylase-positive thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei. CML glycation does not occur in PrPC but is seen in the pathologic PrPSc isoform. Furthermore, the modification of PrPSc with CML may be closely involved in prion propagation and deposition in pathological brain areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Prions, which are likely primarily composed of the pathogenic prion isoform (PrPSc), are deposited in pathological areas, particularly in the brains of prion diseases that occur in humans and animals [1]. Prions induce the disease by converting the cellular prion isoform PrPC into PrPSc, which occurs in an enigmatic manner that remains elusive [2]. PrPC undergoes a series of posttranslational and conformational change(s) which probably contribute in unknown way(s) to the conversion of PrPC (in the presence of PrPSc) into PrPSc. The mechanism that converts the cellular prion isoform into the pathogenic isoform must be elucidated to ultimately develop efficient therapeutics for these diseases [3]. Despite the numerous attempts to determine the structure of PrPSc as the first step to describe the chain of prion conversion reactions, its definitive structure remains unclear [3]. The structure of PrPC has been determined, whereas that of PrPSc has merely been theoretically proposed using methods such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, circular dichroism spectroscopy, electron microscopy and crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray fiber diffraction, small angle X-ray scattering, hydrogen/deuterium exchange, limited proteolysis by proteinase K (PK), and antibody application to linearly or discontinuously probe the small surface accessible and secondary structural segments of the PrP protein backbone [3–18]. The ad interim trials seeking to reveal the definitive structure of PrPSc have not been productive, and the lack of an experimentally determined PrPSc structure is likely due to the structural variants of PrPSc (PrPSc heterodimers and additional multimers) that undergo a variety of stoichiometric conformational transformation(s) in prion-infected individuals [3, 19].
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are produced by the nonenzymatic glycation of amino compounds (i.e., proteins) with reducing sugars through a series of sequential and irreversible reactions, which exhibit some reversibility during the early stage of the reaction [20]. Various AGEs can be generated in vitro through the nonenzymatic glycation between bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a source of amino compounds and glucose (or glucose-6-phosphate, glyoxal, methylglyoxal, glycoaldehyde, or 3-deoxyglucosone) as one of the carbohydrates; these AGEs have been used as specific immunogens to produce anti-AGE(s) antibodies with a variety of anti-AGEs IgG populations or a specific anti-AGE IgG population [20–24]. Certain types of AGEs are deposited in in vivo pathological areas associated with numerous diseases featuring abnormal circulatory metabolism such as diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis, thereby exacerbating these disorders. AGEs are also deposited in the hippocampal CA4 pyramidal neurons within elderly human brains, a finding that suggests their involvement in the aging process [20, 24–26].
A previous study showed that at least one Lys residue at the N-terminus of PrPSc of 263K prion-infected hamsters was linked with AGEs [27]. In addition, the pathogenic prion isoform PrPSc was modified with AGEs in the brains of 139H prion-infected hamsters, as well as in ME7-, 22L-, 139A-, and 87V-prion-infected mice and in human patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) or variant CJD. The fact that PrPC was not glycated in these conditions suggests that the pathogenic prion isoform becomes nonenzymatically glycated with any form of carbohydrate in the brains of the prion-affected individuals during the long incubation period [27]. The current study investigated whether the N-terminal AGE is CML, which is a major type of AGE that modifies Lys residues [20]. The N-terminal AGEs of pathogenic prion isoforms have been affinity-isolated using 3F4 anti-PrP IgG and the R3 anti-AGEs antibody developed in previous studies [27, 28]. Using these reagents, we identified CML as an N-terminal AGE of pathogenic prion isoforms. Although the functional role of the CML linkage to pathogenic prion isoforms is currently unknown, it might be closely related to prion propagation.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies and Reagents
For PrP, the 3F4 and 3F10 anti-PrP IgGs (mouse monoclonal) [28, 29] and the 78295 anti-PrP antibody (rabbit polyclonal) [30] were used in this study. For CML, NF-1G and CMS-10 anti-CML IgGs (mouse monoclonal, Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd., Japan) [23] were used; for AGEs, the R3 anti-AGEs antibody (rabbit polyclonal) [27] was used; for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), anti-TH IgG (mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) was used; and for β-actin, anti-β-actin IgG (mouse monoclonal, Sigma, USA) was used. All other reagents not described were purchased from Sigma.
Animal and Prion Strain
The hamster-adapted 263K prion strain was kindly provided by Richard H. Kimberlin (MRC Neuropathogenesis Unit, UK). Six-week-old male golden Syrian hamsters (n = 20, ORIENTBIO, Korea) were intracerebrally inoculated with 1 % (w/v) brain homogenates (50 μl) prepared in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) from either normal hamster brain or hamster-adapted 263K prion-infected brain at the terminal stage of the disease. The brains were harvested after the clinical signs were evident (70 days post-inoculation, dpi). The “Principles of laboratory animal care” (NIH publication no. 86-23, revised 1985) was followed, as well as a specific national law of the Republic of Korea on the protection of experimental animals. The Hallym University Animal Experimentation Committee approved all of the animal protocols used in this study.
Immunofluorescence
After the hamsters were anesthetized at the terminal stage of the disease (70 dpi), they were transcardially perfused with a cold 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer and then fixed with cold 4 % paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer. The hamster brains were immediately removed and then postfixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 12 h at 4 °C, rinsed with 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, dehydrated with sucrose for 12 h at 4 °C, and then cryo-cut using a microtome into 25-μm-thick coronal sections. After treatment with an avidin/biotin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories, USA), the sections were incubated with primary antibodies and sequentially with a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG, followed by treatment with Fluorescein Avidin DCS (Vector Laboratories, USA) for 3F4, NF-1G, or CMS-10. The sections were re-treated with an avidin/biotin blocking kit and then anti-mouse IgG to completely block the first primary antibodies. The sections were then incubated with the NF-1G, CMS-10, or TH antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Each section was treated with a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG followed by treatment with Rhodamine Avidin D (Vector Laboratories, USA). The exposure parameters for confocal laser scanning were the same across the control and infected samples, and photographic documentation was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Germany). Image analysis was performed using LSM Image Browser 3,5,0,223 software (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Immuno-gold Labeling and Transmission Electron Microscopy
When clinical signs were evident in the infected hamsters, both infected and controls were anesthetized with 16.5 % urethane and transcardially perfused with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 2.5 % glutaraldehyde (GA). After the brains were removed, the thalamic and hypothalamic regions were immediately trimmed into small pieces and kept in the fixative buffer (0.1 M PBS containing 4 % PFA and 2.5 % GA) for 2 h at 4 °C. Post-fixation was conducted in 0.1 M PBS containing 1 % osmium tetroxide, followed by dehydration with a graded ethanol series and embedding with an Embed 812 kit (EMS, USA). Ultra-thin sections (75 nm) prepared with an ultramicrotome (RMC MTXL, USA) and a nickel grid were incubated in a target retrieval solution (TRS, pH 9.0, DAKO, Denmark) for 15 min at 110 °C to completely unblock the epitopes. The sections were blocked with a blocking buffer (0.5 % BSA, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 % gelatin, and 0.05 % Tween-20 in PBS) and immunogold-labeled twice with 3F4 anti-PrP IgG and the R3 anti-AGEs antibody, or the 78295 anti-PrP antibody and NF-1G anti-CML IgG, or the R3 anti-AGEs antibody and NF-1G anti-CML IgG. Gold-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (10 nm) or 15 nm of gold-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Aurion, The Netherlands) was used as the secondary antibody. When the distance between a 10-nm gold particle and a 15-nm one is less than 15 nm, it was regarded that two gold particles co-localized in an area. Between each step, the sections were washed with the blocking buffer. The sections were counterstained with uranyl acetate and observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1011, JEOL, Japan).
Isolation of the PrPSc-Enriched Insoluble Fraction
A PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction was isolated as previously described [27, 31]. Briefly, the control and infected brains were homogenized in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4) containing 10 % N-lauroyl sarcosine in the presence of DNase І and centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 150,000 g for 2 h at 4 °C, and the resulting pellet (PU1st, pellet following the first ultracentrifugation) was sonicated and resuspended in TBS (pH 7.4) containing 10 % NaCl and 0.1 % myristyl sulfobetaine (SB3-14) followed by layering onto TBS (pH 7.4) containing 10 % NaCl, 0.1 % SB3-14, and 20 % sucrose (sucrose cushion) and ultracentrifugation in the same condition. The resulting pellet (PU2nd, pellet following the second ultracentrifugation) was sonicated and re-suspended in TBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 % SB3-14 prior to treatment with PK (25 μg/insoluble fraction extracted from 1 g of brain, 2 h at 37 °C). After the PK-treated sample was ultracentrifuged in the same condition using a sucrose cushion, the resulting pellet (PU3rd, pellet following the third ultracentrifugation) was sonicated and re-suspended in TBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 % SB3-14. The post-mitochondrial (supernatant) fraction of the control preparation in which the control brains had been homogenized in TBS (pH 7.4) followed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min was used as the PrPC-containing fraction.
Immunoprecipitation
The insoluble fraction (15 μg of total proteins) isolated from the brains of control or 263K prion-infected hamsters and 30 μg of the PrPC-containing post-mitochondrial fraction proteins prepared from control brains were boiled to unblock the epitopes and immunoprecipitated with NF-1G anti-CML IgG, 3F4 anti-PrP IgG, or the R3 anti-AGEs antibody. Each antibody was first coated to the surface of magnetic Dynabeads® M-280 Tosylactivated (Life Technologies, USA) according to the procedure described by the manufacturer. The antigen–antibody–magnetic bead complexes were washed several times with 0.05 % PBST using a magnet (Dynal MPC, Life Technologies, USA) and subsequently eluted by boiling in a sample-loading buffer. For immunoprecipitation, the PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction (2 μg of total proteins) isolated from the brains of 263K prion-infected animals was used as a positive control.
Gel Staining and Western Blot
The control and 263K prion-infected brains were homogenized with 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS, and protease inhibitor cocktail, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the supernatant was used as a HEPES-soluble homogenate fraction. The insoluble fraction (2 μg of total proteins) isolated from the brains of the control or 263K prion-infected animals or the immunoprecipitates were separated using 12 % sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) G-250 or transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5 % skim milk in 0.05 % TBST (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05 % Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with mouse monoclonal NF-1G anti-CML IgG (10 μg) in PBS, or rabbit polyclonal R3 anti-AGEs antibody (1:1,000), or rabbit polyclonal 78295 anti-PrP antibody (1:5,000), or mouse monoclonal 3F4 anti-PrP IgG (1:20,000), or mouse monoclonal 3F10 anti-PrP IgG (1:30,000) in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. The membrane was incubated with anti-mouse IgG-peroxidase or anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase, and the antigen–antibody complexes were visualized using SuperSignal West Pico (Thermo Scientific, USA). The protein was quantified using a BCA protein assay (Thermo Scientific, USA).
Isolation of N-Terminal AGEs from PrPSc
To isolate the N-terminal AGEs from PrPSc, the magnetic Dynabeads M-280 Tosylactivated coated with 3F4 anti-PrP IgG or the R3 anti-AGEs antibody were incubated with 1.0 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.5) for 48 h at room temperature to completely block nonspecific binding to the magnetic beads. The post-mitochondrial fraction (50 μg of total proteins) isolated from the control brains and the insoluble fraction (50 μg of total proteins) isolated from the 263K prion-infected brains were first incubated with the 3F4 anti-PrP IgG-coated magnetic beads. The 3F4 immune complexes were washed several times with 0.05 % PBST using a magnet. After changing the tube immediately before the last washing, the immune complexes were eluted with 0.5 M NH4OH containing 0.5 mM EDTA for 1 h and then neutralized with acetic acid. The PrP fractions purified from the 3F4 anti-PrP IgG-coated beads were treated with PK (50 μg/ml) for 1 h at 37 °C and then with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Germany). The PK-treated PrP fraction of the infected brains was then subjected to ultracentrifugation in which the supernatant was used for the subsequent immunoprecipitation (α in Fig. 6a and lane 5 in Fig. 6b); alternatively, the PK-treated PrP fraction was used for the subsequent immunoprecipitation (β in Fig. 6a and lanes 2 and 6 in Fig. 6b). Both fractions were incubated with R3 anti-AGEs antibody-coated magnetic beads. The R3 immune complexes were washed, eluted, and neutralized using the same buffers as described in the purification procedure to isolate PrPSc. Both purified fractions were used for Dot blot or Western blot (Fig. 6).
Results
CML Co-localizes with PrP in Tyrosine Hydroxylase-Positive Neurons
We first investigated the localization of PrP and CML in control and 263K prion-infected brains. Both NF-1G IgG-positive CML and CMS-10 IgG-positive CML co-localized with the PK-resistant prion isoform in the thalamic regions of PK-treated infected brain, indicating co-localization of CML with PrPSc in the same cells (Fig. 1 and upper panels in Fig. 2). Both PrP and CML exhibited much lower abundance in the thalamic regions of control brains compared to infected brains, indicating few or no PrP and CML deposits in control brains (Fig. 1). Moreover, both PrP and CML localized within tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive cells of the thalamic regions in infected brains (lower panels in Figs. 2 and 3). CML was co-localized with PK-resistant prion isoform in the parietal cortex and hippocampus of infected brains (Supplementary Fig. 1).
CML-Positive Proteins Are Present in the PrPSc-Enriched Insoluble Fraction
We next determined whether CML was associated with the PrPSc deposits found in infected brains. Initially, PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction from infected brains was isolated using ultracentrifugation (Fig. 4a). The PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction (PU2nd) was isolated from the infected brains using ultracentrifugation with a sucrose cushion. A portion of the PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction was treated with PK, followed by an additional ultracentrifugation using a sucrose cushion and yielding supernatant SU3rd and pellet PU3rd. The proteins in the three fractions were separated and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G 250. As shown in Fig. 4a, the PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction isolated from the infected brains (PU2nd) contained numerous proteins, including several proteins that likely represent PrPSc isoforms with molecular weights of less than 35 kDa; however, although several PK-resistant PrPSc isoforms were present in the PK-treated insoluble fraction following the limited proteolysis (PU3rd), they were not present in the supernatant (SU3rd). Next, we identified the full-length and truncated PrPSc isoforms in the PU2nd and PU3rd fractions. We identified three R3 anti-AGEs antibody-positive proteins in the PU2nd fraction (Fig. 4b), as observed in a previous report [27]. PrP positivity was not observed in the insoluble fraction isolated from control brain, indicating that normal PrPC was not precipitated by the ultracentrifugation (Fig. 4b). We next identified whether CML positivity was present in the PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction. Using NF-1G anti-CML IgG, we found five proteins containing CML adduct on their Lys residue(s) in the insoluble fraction isolated from infected brains but not in the insoluble fraction from the control brains (the first through the third lanes from the left in Fig. 4c). Four CML-linked proteins were identified even in the PK-digested insoluble fraction (PU3rd) of infected brains. These proteins exhibited apparent molecular masses that were nearly identical to those of the truncated PrPSc isoforms following PK proteolysis in SDS-PAGE analysis (the first lane from the right in Fig. 4c). The three R3-positive AGEs-linked proteins were only detected in the insoluble fraction that was not digested with PK (Fig. 4b, d). In contrast, no differential AGE positivity was seen in soluble fractions (Ho) of control and infected brains (Fig. 4d).
Pathogenic Prion Isoforms Are Modified by CML at One or More Lys Residues
Next, we ascertained whether the pathogenic prion isoform is modified with CML. An immunoprecipitation analysis using NF-1G anti-CML IgG and the 78295 anti-PrP antibody identified CML-positive protein associated with each PrPSc isoform (Fig. 5a). Therefore, at least one Lys residue in the PK-resistant core region of the PrPSc isoform was modified with CML. No such effect was observed in control brains. Moreover, in Fig. 5b, we observed that the CML-positive immune complexes that were immunoprecipitated by NF-1G anti-CML IgG using the non-PK-treated insoluble fraction of the infected brains were detected by the R3 anti-AGEs antibody (the first and the third lanes from the left in Fig. 5b). Immune complexes were not seen using the PK-treated insoluble fractions (the second and the fourth lanes from the left in Fig. 5b). No positivity was observed for immunoprecipitation without an antibody (NA), excluding the possibility that PrPSc is nonspecifically bound to the magnetic beads (Fig. 5a, b, first lane from the right, respectively). The immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that at least one Lys residue in each of the three glycosylated (di-, mono-, and non-) types of the pathogenic prion isoforms was modified with CML.
CML Is an N-Terminal AGE of PrPSc
We previously showed that AGEs are linked to PrPSc at one or more Lys residues at 23, 24, and 27 in the N-terminal region of PrPSc [27]. To clarify whether the N-terminal AGEs of PrPSc are CMLs, we affinity-purified the R3 anti-AGEs antibody-positive species that were immunoprecipitated by 3F4. Subsequently, these immunoprecipitates were eluted from the supernatant fraction, in which soluble forms of proteins and the truncated non-insoluble amino acid residues by PK proteolysis reside, after PK digestion and ultracentrifugation (Fig. 6a, α) or from the PK-treated PrP fraction (Fig. 6a, β) following the purification of PrPSc from the insoluble fraction with 3F4-coated magnetic beads. CML immunoreactivity was increased for both of the eluates sequentially purified from the 3F4-beads and the R3-bead immune complexes in a loaded volume-dependent manner (Fig. 6a). No prion isoforms were found in either of the eluates purified by 3F4 and R3 antibodies (the fifth and the sixth lanes from the left in Fig. 6b), whereas the prion isoforms were detected in the eluates from the 3F4-bead immune complexes used as positive controls (the third and the fourth lanes from the left in Fig. 6b). These results indicate that neither of the CML-positive eluates purified by the 3F4 and R3 antibodies contained the proteolytically truncated PrPSc; rather, they contained at least one CML-linked Lys residue or a CML-linked peptide fragment(s) proteolytically dissociated from the N-terminus of PrPSc due to PK treatment that digests the N-terminal region (23–89) of PrPSc in 263K-infected hamster whereas leaves the truncated PK-resistant PrPSc isoform (PrP 90–231) [1]. In addition, nonspecific binding of the proteolytically truncated PrPSc to the R3 anti-AGEs antibody-coated magnetic beads was not observed (the first lane from right in Fig. 6b). These findings indicate that at least one of the three Lys residues at positions 23, 24, and 27 at the N-terminus of PrPSc was linked with CML. Alternatively, at least one Lys residue might be involved in the formation of other complex AGE structures containing a CML moiety.
CML-Linked PrPSc Localizes in the Cellular Compartments of Neurons
Next, we performed a TEM analysis to identify the localization of CML-linked PrPSc within cells of the infected brain (Fig. 7). The co-localization of PrP and AGEs was observed in the plasma membrane, mitochondria, and cytosol within the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei of the infected brains, whereas no co-localization was observed in the control brains (Fig. 7a–d). PrP co-localized with CML in the nuclear membrane and in the cytosol within the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei of the infected brains but not in these regions of control brains (Fig. 7e–h). In addition, AGEs co-localized with CML in the mitochondria and cytosol within the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei of the infected brains but not those of the control brains (Fig. 7i–l). These observations indicate that both glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored and intracellular PrP isoforms (which are likely to be PrPSc) were modified with CML in the plasma membrane and in specific intracellular regions of the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei.
Discussion
In this study, we observed that CML and the prion isoform (PrPSc) were deposited in numerous brain areas (data not shown), including the parietal cortex and hippocampus in 263K prion-infected hamsters; however, few or no deposits of CML or PrP were observed in the controls. CML was shown to be extensively co-localized with PrPSc in the thalamic regions of the infected brains, and the CML was linked to at least one Lys residue at the N-terminus of PrPSc as well as to at least one of eight Lys residues on the PK-resistant core region of PrPSc. The CML linkage to PrPSc (i.e., the modification of PrPSc with CML) occurred in the TH-positive neurons within the thalamic regions of infected brains. The current study found that TH, which is the rate-limiting enzyme of dopamine biosynthesis in the dopaminergic neurons of the basal ganglia and nigrostriatal system, was localized in numerous thalamic nuclei of the infected brains; previous studies have reported similar results [32–34]. Thus, we assume that both the prion isoform- and the CML-positive cells would be TH-positive dopamine-like neurons in the thalamic regions of the infected brains. Although numerous PrP-positive cells were TH-positive in most of the thalamic regions of the infected brains (data not shown), certain 3F4-positive PrP isoforms were only localized in a number of TH-positive neurons, particularly in the “zona incerta, dorsal parts” and the “zona incerta, ventral parts” of the thalamic region in infected brains (but not in all TH-positive neurons; see Fig. 2). Although the infected brains were harvested at the terminal stage, not all TH-positive neurons in the thalamic region of the infected brains expressed PrP isoforms (see Fig. 2). In addition, the PrP isoform within certain TH-positive neurons in the infected brains must have been PrPSc constituting prions because the normal prion isoform (PrPC) was expressed at basal levels. These neurons were observed less often in the control brains (see Fig. 1). These observations indicate that prion conversion occurred in numerous, but not all, TH-positive dopamine-like neurons within the thalamic regions of the infected brains, suggesting the co-localization of the prion protein and TH since a recent study has reported an interaction between the prion protein and TH [35].
The NF-1G anti-CML IgG used in this study detected several CML-positive proteins with molecular weights of less than 27 kDa, whereas the R3 and 6D12, anti-AGEs antibodies, which were used in a previous study, did not (Fig. 4c) [27]. Our finding indicates that the specific PrPSc isoforms with molecular weights of less than 27 kDa in infected brains may be modified with CML. In a previous study, R3 detected three AGEs-modified pathogenic prion isoforms in the non-PK-treated PrPSc-enriched insoluble fraction at the positions identical to di-, mono-, and non-glycosylated prion isoforms, whereas 6D12 detected two AGE-modified pathogenic prion isoforms at the positions identical to di- and mono-glycosylated prion isoforms [27]. However, neither R3 nor 6D12 anti-AGEs antibodies were able to detect any isoform of the pathogenic prion protein in the PK-treated insoluble fraction, indicating that both anti-AGEs antibodies detected AGE structures located only at the PK-sensitive N-terminal portion of the pathogenic prion isoform. The CML-positive proteins, which appear as truncated PrPSc isoforms after PK proteolysis, were detected in the insoluble fraction isolated from the infected brains even after PK proteolysis (see Fig. 4c). This observation indicates a linkage between Nε-carboxymethyl and at least one of the eight Lys residues on the PK-resistant core region of PrPSc from infected hamster brain. Eight Lys residues are present in the PK-resistant core region of the golden hamster prion protein at positions 101, 104, 106, 110, 185, 194, 204, and 220 (P04273 in UniprotKB).
The result shown in Fig. 5b suggests the following regarding the position of the Nε-carboxymethyl modification of PrPSc isoforms in the infected brains: One or more PK-sensitive N-terminal CML moieties on the PrPSc isoform were immunoprecipitated and then positively immunoreacted with the R3 anti-AGEs antibody. This observation suggests that Nε-carboxymethyl is linked to the side chain of at least one PK-sensitive N-terminal Lys residue. Additionally, the specific PrPSc isoform modified with CML at one or more Lys residues in the PK-resistant core region may also be modified with AGEs (i.e., CML) at its N-terminus. Notably, the R3 anti-AGEs antibody does not detect the CML moiety on the PK-resistant core of the specific PrPSc but can detect CML moieties in AGE structure(s) on the N-terminus. This finding suggests the possible following scenarios: the CML structure is linked at the PK-sensitive N-terminus of specific PrPSc isoforms; however, this “CML” might actually be a CML-like structure(s) containing a CML moiety, which differs slightly from the structure of CML. The prion protein contains two consecutive Lys residues at positions 23 and 24 in the PK-sensitive N-terminus that may be linked to a more complex AGE structure containing a CML moiety via nonenzymatic glycation of the individual amino groups of side chains. Thus, the R3 anti-AGEs antibody may detect a more complex CML moiety-containing AGE structure on the side chains of Lys 23 and Lys 24, as well as CML on Lys 27. This interpretation suggests that the N-terminal AGE structure of PrPSc is a CML or a more complex structure containing a CML moiety produced by glycation of the consecutive Lys residues’ side amino groups including the N-terminal amine of Lys 23; this structure may be similar to the methylglyoxal-lysine dimer or glyoxallysine dimer, which are Lys–Lys cross-linked AGEs [36]. As suggested, the lack of an experimentally determined structure of PrPSc may be due to the variants of PrPSc that undergo kaleidoscopic changes in in vivo cells or tissues [3]. Thus, the CML-modified PrPSc isoforms may represent a variant of PrPSc. More elaborate techniques must be developed to isolate the PK-sensitive N-terminal AGE structure of PrPSc (e.g., developing a protease[s] that specifically cleaves the peptide bond between Lys and Lys, between Lys and Arg, or between Pro and Lys in the N-terminal sequence (23KKRPKP28) of prion proteins; this N-terminal sequence is identical in nearly all mammalian species).
AGEs can be formed by a series of reactions, called nonenzymatic glycation, between amino groups of amino acids (particularly Lys or Arg) and carbohydrates in vitro and in vivo, thereby affecting the aging process and neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease [20, 36, 37]. A TBS–sucrose cushion buffer was used in the second and third ultracentrifugation procedures to isolate the PrPSc-enriched insoluble fractions in this study. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether the CML modification of PrPSc occurs via the glycation between PrPSc and sucrose during the in vitro ultracentrifugation procedures using a sucrose cushion. We determined that the PrPSc isoform of 263K prion-infected brains was not nonenzymatically glycated with sucrose (or glucose) via in vitro glycation of the PrPSc-containing PU1st (the pellet fraction isolated following the first ultracentrifugation) (unpublished data). Neither sucrose nor glucose induced AGEs modification of the pathogenic prion isoform in vitro. Therefore, the CML-linked (or AGEs-linked) prion protein was produced in infected brains. In addition, a previous study showed that the NF-1G anti-CML antibody was specific to CML that had been produced from the nonenzymatic glycation between amino acid Lys in the presence of a reducing agent (NaCNBH3) or from bovine serum albumin-derived AGEs in the presence of the reducing agent [38].
The current study showed that at least one Lys residue at the PK-sensitive N-terminus of PrPSc was modified with CML, and there is CML on at least one of the eight Lys residues on the PK-resistant core of PrPSc. In addition, CML modification of PrPSc appeared to occur primarily in the plasma membrane, nuclear membrane, mitochondria, and cytosol of the prion-affected cells, especially in TH-expressing cells in thalamic and hypothalamic regions, parietal cortex, and hippocampus. The role(s) of the AGEs-modified pathogenic prion isoform in prion-infected brains must be elucidated further.
References
Prusiner SB (1998) Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:13363–13383
Prusiner SB (1982) Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216:136–144
Requena JR, Wille H (2014) The structure of the infectious prion protein: experimental data and molecular models. Prion 8:60–66
Amenitsch H, Benetti F, Ramos A, Legname G, Requena JR (2013) SAXS structural study of PrPSc reveals ~11 nm diameter of basic double intertwined fibers. Prion 7:496–500
Biasini E, Seegulam ME, Patti BN, Solforosi L, Medrano AZ, Christensen HM, Senatore A, Chiesa R, Williamson RA, Harris DA (2008) Non-infectious aggregates of the prion protein react with several PrPSc-directed antibodies. J Neurochem 105:2190–2204
Caughey BW, Dong A, Bhat KS, Ernst D, Hayes SF, Caughey WS (1991) Secondary structure analysis of the scrapie-associated protein PrP 27–30 in water by infrared spectroscopy. Biochemistry 30:7672–7680
Gong B, Ramos A, Vázquez-Fernández E, Silva CJ, Alonso J, Liu Z, Requena JR (2011) Probing structural differences between PrPC and PrPSc by surface nitration and acetylation: evidence of conformational change in the C-terminus. Biochemistry 50:4963–4972
Merz PA, Somerville RA, Wisniewski HM, Iqbal K (1981) Abnormal fibrils from scrapie-infected brain. Acta Neuropathol 54:63–74
Nguyen JT, Inouye H, Baldwin MA, Fletterick RJ, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB, Kirschner DA (1995) X-ray diffraction of scrapie prion rods and PrP peptides. J Mol Biol 252:412–422
Pan KM, Baldwin M, Nguyen J, Gasset M, Serban A, Groth D, Mehlhorn I, Huang Z, Fletterick RJ, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB (1993) Conversion of alpha-helices into beta-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:10962–10966
Paramithiotis E, Pinard M, Lawton T, LaBoissiere S, Leathers VL, Zou WQ et al (2003) A prion protein epitope selective for the pathologically misfolded conformation. Nat Med 9:893–899
Prusiner SB, McKinley MP, Bowman KA, Bolton DC, Bendheim PE, Groth DF, Glenner GG (1983) Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods. Cell 35:349–358
Riek R, Hornemann S, Wider G, Billeter M, Glockshuber R, Wüthrich K (1996) NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121–231). Nature 382:180–182
Safar J, Roller PP, Gajdusek DC, Gibbs CJ Jr (1993) Conformational transitions, dissociation, and unfolding of scrapie amyloid (prion) protein. J Biol Chem 268:20276–20284
Silva CJ (2012) Using small molecule reagents to selectively modify epitopes based on their conformation. Prion 6:163–173
Smirnovas V, Baron GS, Offerdahl DK, Raymond GJ, Caughey B, Surewicz WK (2011) Structural organization of brain-derived mammalian prions examined by hydrogen–deuterium exchange. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:504–506
Vázquez-Fernández E, Alonso J, Pastrana MA, Ramos A, Stitz L, Vidal E, Dynin I, Petsch B, Silva CJ, Requena JR (2012) Structural organization of mammalian prions as probed by limited proteolysis. PLoS One 7, e50111
Wille H, Michelitsch MD, Guenebaut V, Supattapone S, Serban A, Cohen FE, Agard DA, Prusiner SB (2002) Structural studies of the scrapie prion protein by electron crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3563–3568
Supattapone S (2004) Prion protein conversion in vitro. J Mol Med (Berl) 82:348–356
Ulrich P, Cerami A (2001) Protein glycation, diabetes, and aging. Recent Prog Horm Res 56:1–21
Horiuchi S, Araki N, Morino Y (1991) Immunochemical approach to characterize advanced glycation end products of the Maillard reaction. Evidence for the presence of a common structure. J Biol Chem 266:7329–7332
Jono T, Nagai R, Lin X, Ahmed N, Thornalley PJ, Takeya M, Horiuchi S (2004) Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine and 3-DG-imidazolone are major AGE structures in protein modification by 3-deoxyglucosone. J Biochem 136:351–358
Koito W, Araki T, Horiuchi S, Nagai R (2004) Conventional antibody against Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) shows cross-reaction to Nε-(carboxyethyl)lysine (CEL): immunochemical quantification of CML with a specific antibody. J Biochem 136:831–837
Nagai R, Hayashi CM, Xia L, Takeya M, Horiuchi S (2002) Identification in human atherosclerotic lesions of GA-pyridine, a novel structure derived from glycoaldehyde-modified proteins. J Biol Chem 277:48905–48912
Jono T, Kimura T, Takamatsu J, Nagai R, Miyazaki K, Yuzuriha T, Kitamura T, Horiuchi S (2002) Accumulation of imidazolone, pentosidine and Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine in hippocampal CA4 pyramidal neurons of aged human brain. Pathol Int 52:563–571
Seki N, Hashimoto N, Taira M, Yagi S, Yoshida Y, Ishikawa K et al (2007) Regulation of Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase by advanced glycation end products: the role on atherosclerosis in diabetes. Metabolism 56:1591–1598
Choi YG, Kim JI, Jeon YC, Park SJ, Choi EK, Rubenstein R, Kascsak RJ, Carp RI, Kim YS (2004) Nonenzymatic glycation at the N terminus of pathogenic prion protein in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. J Biol Chem 279:30402–30409
Kascsak RJ, Rubenstein R, Merz PA, Tonna-DeMasi M, Fersko R, Carp RI, Wisniewski HM, Diringer H (1987) Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins. J Virol 61:3688–3693
Choi JK, Park SJ, Jun YC, Oh JM, Jeong BH, Lee HP, Park SN, Carp RI, Kim YS (2006) Generation of monoclonal antibody recognized by the GXXXG motif (glycine zipper) of prion protein. Hybridoma (Larchmt) 25:271–277
Kascsak RJ, Fersko R, Pulgiano D, Rubenstein R, Carp RI (1997) Immunodiagnosis of prion disease. Immunol Invest 26:259–268
Bossers A, Belt PBGM, Raymond GJ, Caughey B, de Vries R, Smits MA (1997) Scrapie susceptibility-linked polymorphisms modulate the in vitro conversion of sheep prion protein to protease-resistant forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:4931–4936
Asmus SE, Newman SW (1993) Tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA-containing neurons in the medial amygdaloid nucleus and the reticular nucleus of the thalamus in the Syrian hamster. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 20:267–273
Kitahama K, Okamura H, Goldstein M, Nagatsu I, Bérod A, Jouvet M (1989) A new group of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons in the cat thalamus. Brain Res 478:156–160
Yeo S, Choi YG, Hong YM, Lim S (2013) Neuroprotective changes of thalamic degeneration-related gene expression by acupuncture in an MPTP mouse model of parkinsonism: microarray analysis. Gene 515:329–338
Vicario M, Zagari A, Granata V, Munari F, Mammi S, Bubacco L, Skaper SD, Negro A (2014) A novel prion protein–tyrosine hydroxylase interaction. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 13:896–908
Grillo MA, Colombatto S (2008) Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs): involvement in aging and in neurodegenerative diseases. Amino Acids 35:29–36
Smith MA, Taneda S, Richey PL, Miyata S, Yan SD, Stern D, Sayre LM, Monnier VM, Perry G (1994) Advanced Maillard reaction end products are associated with Alzheimer disease pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:5710–5714
Choi YG, Lim S (2009) Characterization of anti-advanced glycation end product antibodies to nonenzymatically lysine-derived and arginine-derived glycated products. J Immunoass Immunochem 30:386–399
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant, funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2011-619-E0001).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
CML is localized in the PrP-positive cells in the parietal cortex and hippocampus of the 263K prion-infected brains. The parietal cortex (upper panels) and hippocampus (lower panels) in the 263K prion-infected brains that were treated with PK (50 μg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature were sequentially immunostained with 3F4 anti-PrP IgG (left panels, green) and NF-1G anti-CML IgG (central panels, red), and the images were observed and merged (right panels, yellow). The arrows indicate the co-localization of PrP and CML. Each bar indicates 20 μm. (GIF 316 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, YG., Shin, HY., Kim, JI. et al. Nε-Carboxymethyl Modification of Lysine Residues in Pathogenic Prion Isoforms. Mol Neurobiol 53, 3102–3112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9200-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9200-8