Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the crystal structure stability of UO2 upon applying pressure using an evolutionary algorithm. UO2 exhibits face-centred cubic crystal structure with space group \(Fm\overline{3}m\) (S.G. No. 225) in the ambient pressure, and above 82 GPa transforms to an orthorhombic structure with space group Pnma (S.G. No. 62). The first-order structural phase transition is accompanied by a 5.4% volume collapse. The lattice parameters of both the cubic and orthorhombic phases decrease with the applied pressure. The bulk modulus (\({B}_{\mathrm{o}}\)) and the pressure derivative of bulk modulus (\({B}_{\mathrm{o}}^{{\prime}}\)) values of the cubic phase were found to be 210.41 ± 0.22 GPa and 3.60 ± 0.01, respectively. The \({B}_{\mathrm{o}}\) and \({B}_{\mathrm{o}}^{{{\prime}} }\) values of the orthorhombic phase were found to be 218.09 ± 3.29 GPa and 3.64 ± 0.03, respectively. The enthalpy of formation linearly increases with the applied pressure for both the cubic and orthorhombic phases, and at 82 GPa the enthalpy of the orthorhombic phase is found to be lower than the cubic phase indicating the structural phase transition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Website of World Nuclear Association December 2021 https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/facts-and-figures/world-nuclear-power-reactors-and-uranium-requireme.aspx
Sengupta A K, Khan K B, Panakkal J, Kamath H S and Banerjee S 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 385 173
MacDonald P E and Lee C B 2004 Nucl. Tech. 147 18
Jae-Young Oh, Koo Yang-Hyun and Lee Byung-Ho 2009 Nucl. Eng. Tech. 41 1109
Benedict U, Andreetti G D, Fournier J M and Waintal A 1982 J. Phys. Lett. 43 171
Idiri M, Le Bihan T L, Heathman S and Rebizant J 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 014113
Geng H Y, Chen Y, Kaneta Y and Kinoshita M 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 054111
Gréaux S, Gautron L, Andrault D, Bolfan-Casanova N, Guignot N and Haines J 2008 Am. Mineralogist 93 1090
Tian X, Wang Y, Ge L, Dong W, You Z, Ding P et al 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 169 109124
Fossati C M P, Van Brutzel Laurent and Chartier Alain 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 214112
Wang B-T, Zhang P, Lizárraga R, Di Marco I and Eriksson O 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 104107
Oganov A R and Glass C W 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 124 244704
Colin W G, Oganov A R and Hansen N 2006 Comp. Phys. Commun. 175 713
Lyakhov A O, Oganov A R, Stokes H T and Zhu Q 2013 Comp. Phys. Commun. 184 1172
Oganov A R, Lyakhov A O and Valle M 2011 Accts. Chem. Res. 44 227
Buckingham R A 1938 Proc. R Soc. Lond. A 168 264
Hung V V, Thanh L T M and Jindo K M 2010 Comput. Mater. Sci. 49 S355
Levy M R 2005 PhD Thesis (University of London)
Fowler P W, Knowles P J and Pyper N C 1985 Mol. Phys. 56 83
Jha P K, Troper A, da Cunha Lima I C, Talati M and Sanyal S P 2005 Physica B 366 153
Thompson A E, Meredig B, Stan M and Wolverton C 2014 J. Nucl. Mater. 446 155
Potashnikov S I, Boyarchenkov A S, Nekrasov K A and Kupryazhkin A Y 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 419 217
Murnaghan F D 1944 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 30 244
Birch Francis 1947 Phys. Rev. 71 809
Shamba P, Debnath J C, Wang J L and Gu Q F 2019 Physica B: Cond. Mat. 554 5
Acknowledgements
I sincerely thank Dr S Raju, Dr N V Chandra Shekar, Dr Awadesh Mani and Dr N R Sanjay Kumar for their constant support and encouragement during this work. I am thankful to Dr N Subramanian for introducing the USPEX code. I also thank the computer division of IGCAR for providing the computational facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Special issue on ‘High pressure materials science: recent trends’.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sornadurai, D. High pressure structural stability of UO2 by evolutionary algorithm. Bull Mater Sci 45, 228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-022-02819-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-022-02819-w