Skip to main content
Log in

Bulk modulus of second-order pressure derivative for nanomaterials

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high-pressure compression behaviour of titanium dioxide (TiO2) (Rutile phase), iron oxide (\(\gamma\)-Fe2O3), magnesium oxide (MgO) and copper oxide (CuO) nanomaterials are studied by several theoretical equation of state (EOS) model and compared with experimental results. In given theoretical EOS models, the pressure is considered as relative changes of volume and experimental data in terms of pressure. Moreover, the present EOS model specifies close conformity with the experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ye C, Pan S S, Teng X M and Li G H 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma U D and Kumar M 2010 Physica B 405 2820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashok C H, Venkateswara R K and Shilpa Chakra C H 2015 J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 6 1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kholiya K, Chandra J and Verma S 2014 Sci. World J. 2014 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen J S, Gerard L and Jiang J Z 2002 High Press. Res. 22 385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark S M, Prilliman S G, Erdonmez C K and Alivisatos A P 2005 Nanotechnology 16 2813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao J, Guo L, Liu J, Yang Y, Che R Z and Zhou L 2000 Chin. Phys. Lett. 17 126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kholiya K and Chandra J 2014 J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 8 137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tolbert S H and Alivisatos A P 1995 J. Chem. Phys. 102 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou O, Vaughan G B M, Zhu Q, Fischer J E, Heiner P A, Counsel N et al 1992 Science 255 833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ludwig H A, Fietz W H, Hornung F W, Grube K, Renker B and Burkhart G J 1994 Physica C 234 45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen B, Penwell D and Kruger M B 2000 Solid State Commun. 115 191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Jin C, Chen J and Hu J 2004 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 87 2291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Born M and Huang K 1955 in Dynamical theory of crystals lattice (Oxford: Oxford University Press) vol 8, p 444

  15. Wang Z, Tait K, Zhao Y, Schiferl D, Zha C, Uchida H et al 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 11506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson O L 1995 in Equation of state for geophysics and ceramic sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press) vol 1, p 405

  17. Birch F 1952 J. Geophys. Res. 57 227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vinet P, Ferrente J, Smith J R and Rose J H 1986 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19 467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rekhi S, Saxena S K, Atlas Z D and Hu J 2000 Solid State Commun. 117 33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z, Pischedda V, Saxena S K and Lazor P 2002 Solid State Commun. 121 275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Gupta, M. Bulk modulus of second-order pressure derivative for nanomaterials. Bull Mater Sci 44, 218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02503-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02503-5

Keywords

Navigation