Improvement of the chemical, thermal, mechanical and morphological properties of polyethylene terephthalate–graphene particle composites

  • Sameer A Awad
  • Eman M Khalaf


The graphene powder was used as a reinforcement in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with various weight percentages 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 wt%. To prepare PET/graphene powder composites, melt-mixing process was followed. The crosslinking degree between PET and functionalized graphene increased, which was indicated by carbonyl indexes (Fourier transform infrared spectra) when interfaced with PET. The results of thermal properties showed that adding 2 wt% of graphene composites improved the thermal stability, transition glass temperature \(T_\mathrm{g}\), crystallinity temperature point and chemical properties of PET. The results of thermal gravimetric analysis showed that the highest addition of graphene (2 wt%) into the PET slightly improves both the residue yields and thermal stability. The tensile strength of PET was highly increased with the increased loading of graphene, and the elongation was reduced, compared with PET without filler. The results of X-ray diffraction curves showed that 2% incorporation of graphene into PET has good interfacial interaction and higher intensity. The scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed a high compatibility between the pure PET and graphene composite chains.


Polyethylene terephthalate graphene composite thermal stability crystallinity tensile strength 



I would like to acknowledge The University of Al-Anbar-Iraq, Al-Anbar Technical Institute, and the University of Technology, Iraq, for the support and help to my research work.


  1. 1.
    Abdul Razak N, Inuwa I, Hassan A S and Samsudin S 2013 Compos. Interfaces 20 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ávila Córdoba L, Martínez-Barrera G, Barrera Díaz C, Ureña Nuñez F and Loza Yañez A 2013 Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013 Article ID 763276Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koysuren O, Yesil S and Bayram G 2010 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 118 3041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim S and Chow W 2012 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 123 3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu W, Tian X, Cui P, Li Y, Zheng K and Yang Y 2004 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 91 1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moniruzzaman M and Winey K I 2006 Macromolecules 39 5194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen H, Li Y, Zhang F, Zhang G and Fan X 2011 J. Mater. Chem. B 21 17658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen Z 2013 The crystallization of poly (ethylene terephthalate) studied by thermal analysis and FTIR spectroscopy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dideykin A, Aleksenskiy A, Kirilenko D, Brunkov P, Goncharov V, Baidakova M et al 2011 Diamond Relat. Mater. 20 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu K, Kulkarni D D, Choi I and Tsukruk V V 2014 Prog. Polym. Sci. 39 1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang L, Zhan R and Lu Y 2006 J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 25 1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang X, Qi X, Boey F and Zhang H 2012 Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang C H, Xu X B and Li Z M 2007 J. Macromol. Sci. B 47 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joon Choi W, Kim H J K, Han Yoon K, Hyeong Kwon O and Hwang C I K 2006 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 100 4875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalaf E and Awad S 2017 JACS 3 426Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santos P and Pezzin S H 2003 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 143 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, College of Education for Pure ScienceUniversity of Al-AnbarRamadiIraq

Personalised recommendations