Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of sintering temperature and time on the mechanical properties of Co–Cr–Mo/58S bioglass porous nano-composite

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, Co–Cr–Mo/58S bioglass porous nano-composite samples were successfully produced using 30 wt% carbonate hydrogen ammonium and polyvinyl alcohol solution as space holder and binder, respectively. The cold compacted samples were heated at 175°C for 2 h and then were heated to sinter at 1100, 1150, 1200 and 1250°C for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. True porosity of samples was measured and the samples were characterized using the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and compressive test. Although the results of compression test for samples sintered at 1200 and 1250°C showed that the shape of stress–strain curves were similar to each other, compacted powders sintered at 1100 and 1150°C exhibited some fluctuations. Moreover, the compressive strength increased by decreasing the true porosity, indicating the role of high temperature on the sintering process. In addition, volume diffusion was predominant mechanism for these samples at sintering temperature of 1250°C. SEM images of the porous sample sintered at 1250°C for 3 h showed an appropriate range of pore sizes and interconnectivity. The XRD results showed that there are no contaminations and new phase is detectable in the sintered porous samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ping Li J, de Wijn J R, Van Blitterswijk C A and de Groot K 2006 Biomaterials 27 1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dourandish M, Godlinski D, Simchi A and Firouzdor V 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 472 338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacchi J V, Morando C N, Fornaro O and Palacio H A 2011 Mater. Charact. 62 53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lashgari H R, Zangeneh S., Hasanabadi F and Saghafi M 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 4082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greiner C, Oppenheimer S M and Dunand D C 2005 Acta Biomater. 1 705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bansiddhi A and Dunand D C 2008 Acta Biomater. 4 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krishna B V, Bose S and Bandyopadhyay A 2007 Acta Biomater. 3 997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ye B and Dunand D C 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jha N, Mondal D P, Majumdar J D, Badkul A, Jha A K and Khare A K 2013 Mater. Des. 47 810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider E, Kinast C, Eulenberger J, Wyder D, Eskilsson G and Perren S M 1989 Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 248 200

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao Y Y and Sun D X 2001 Scr. Mater. 44 105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan G, Pandit A and Apatsidis D P 2006 Biomaterials 27 2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong J Y, Li Y C, Wang X J, Hodgson P D and Wen C E 2008 J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 1 269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Esen Z and Bor S 2007 Scr. Mater. 56 341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Balamurugan A, Sockalingum G, Michel J, Fauré J, Banchet V, Wortham L, Bouthors S, Laurent-Maquin D and Balossier G 2006 Mater. Lett. 60 3752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Z, Li Q, He F, Huang Y and Wan Y 2012 Mater. Des. 42 13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y H, Chen R B, Qi G X, Wang Z T and Deng Z Y 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 485 215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mansourighasri A, Muhamad N and Sulong A B 2012 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212 83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad S, Muhamad N, Muchtar A, Sahari J, Ibrahim M H I, Jamaludin K R and Nor N H M 2010 Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 5 244

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dewidar M M and Lim J K 2008 J. Alloys Compd. 454 442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Waje S B, Hashim M, Yusoff W D W and Abbas Z 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olevsky E A, Shoales G A and German R M 2001 Mater. Res. Bull. 36 449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lenel F V 1964 Poroshk. Metall. 6 101

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rockland J G R 1967 Acta Met. 15 277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu H C, Wu S C, Hsu S K, Chang T Y and Ho W F 2014 J. Alloys Compd. 582 793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boer J D, Blitterswijk C V, Thomsen P, Hubbell J, Cancedda R, de Bruijn J D, Lindahl A, Sohier J and Williams D F 2008 In Tissue engineering (eds) D Hutmacher, T Woodfield, P Dalton and J Lewis (Canada: Academic Press)

  27. Li J P, Habibovic P, van den Doel M, Wilson C E, de Wijn J R, Van Blitterswijk C A and de Groot K 2007 Biomaterials 28 2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xue W, Krishna B V, Bandyopadhyay A and Bose S 2007 Acta Biomater. 3 1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Giacchi J V, Fornaro O and Palacio H 2012 Mater. Charact. 68 49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hollander R and Wulff J 1975 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 9 367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mancha H, Carranza E, Escalante J I, Mendoza G, Mendez M, Cepeda F and Valdes E 2001 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32A 979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Clemow A J and Daniell B L 1979 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 13 265

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MAJID TAGHIAN DEHAGHANI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DEHAGHANI, M.T., AHMADIAN, M. Effect of sintering temperature and time on the mechanical properties of Co–Cr–Mo/58S bioglass porous nano-composite. Bull Mater Sci 38, 1239–1246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-015-1005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-015-1005-x

Keywords

Navigation