Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

NbCl5 and CrCl3 catalysts effect on synthesis and hydrogen storage performance of Mg–Ni–NiO composites

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two kinds of novel materials, Mg–1·6 mol%Ni–0·4 mol%NiO–2 mol%MCl (MCl = NbCl 5 , CrCl 3 ), along with Mg–1·6 mol%Ni–0·4 mol%NiO for comparison, were examined for their potential use in hydrogen storage applications, having been fabricated via cryomilling. The effects of NbCl 5 and CrCl 3 on hydrogen storage performance were investigated. A microstructure analysis showed that besides the main Mg and Ni phases, NiO and Mg 2 Ni phases were present in all samples. MgCl 2 was only found in halide-doped samples and NbO was only found in NbCl 5 -doped samples after ball milling. The particle size decreased significantly after 7 h of cryomilling. MgH 2 , Mg 2 NiH 4 and Mg 2 NiH0·3 were present in all the samples, while NbH 2 was only observed in the NbCl 5 -doped sample afterabsorption. The NbCl 5 -containing composite exhibited a low onset absorption temperature of 323 K, which was 10 K lower than that of the no-halide doped catalyst. It absorbed 5·32 wt% of hydrogen in 370 s at 623 K under 4 MPa hydrogen pressure and can absorb 90% of its full hydrogen capacity in 50 s. Having an onset desorption temperature of 483 K in vacuum, the NbCl 5 -containing composite desorbed hydrogen faster than the no-halide doped sample. The hydriding–dehydriding kinetics performance of the CrCl 3 -doped sample did not improve, but it did exhibit a lower onset desorption temperature of 543 K under 0·1 MPa, which was 20 K lower than that of the no-halide doped sample. NbO, NiO and NbH 2 played important roles in improving absorption and desorption performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguey-Zinsou K-F and Ares-Fernández J-R 2008 Chem. Mater. 20 376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbir F 2009 Energy 34 308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhordarian G, Klassen T and Bormann R 2003 Scr. Mater. 49 213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry G D, Pasternak A D, Rambach G D, Smith J R and Schock R N 1995 Energy 21 289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czujko T, Varin R A, Chiu C and Wronski Z 2006 J. Alloys Compd 414 240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan M Q, Liu S S, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Sun L X and Xu F 2010 Energy 35 3417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster V, Urretavizcaya G and Castro F J 2009 J. Alloys Compd 481 673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausdorf S, Balitalow F, Wolf G and Mertens F 2008 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S H, Na Y S, Kwon S N, Bae J S and SongMY 2008 J. Alloys Compd 465 512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail M, Zhao Y, Yu X B, Nevirkovets I P and Dou S X 2011 J. Alloys Compd 36 8327

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain I P 2009 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34 7368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain I P, Chhagan Lal and Ankur Jain 2010 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 5133

  • Jiang Kun, Xiao Xuezhang, Lixin Chen, Han Leyuan, Shouquan Li and Hongwei Ge 2012 J. Alloys Compd 539 103

  • Jin Seon-Ah, Shim Jae-Hyeok, Cho Young Whan and Yi Kyung- Woo 2007 J. Power Sources 172 859

  • Kalidindi Suresh Babu and Jagirdar Balaji R 2009 Inorg. Chem. 48 4524

  • Kalisvaart W P, Harrower C T, Haagsma J, Zahiri B, Luber E J and Ophus C 2010 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon S N, Baek S H, Mumm D R, Hong S H and Song M Y 2008 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 4586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Peng P, Zhou D W and Wan L 2011 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 14512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L P, Kang X D, Dai H B, Liang Y, Fang Z Z, Wang P J and Cheng H M 2009 Acta Mater. 57 2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malka I E, Czujko T and Bystrzycki J 2010 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 25 1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J, Guo Z, Yu X, Liu H, Wu Z and Ni J 2010 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 4569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neef H J 2009 Energy 34 327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Principi G, Agresti F, Massalena A and Russo S L 2009 Energy 34 2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakintuna B, Lamari-Darkrim F and Hirscher M 2007 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonus F, Fuster V, Urretavizcaya G, Castro F J and Bobet J L 2009 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34 3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varin R A and Jang M 2011 J. Alloys Compd 509 7134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varin R A and Parviz R 2012 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 9088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Li P, Xie D H, Zheng X P, Zheng C X and Qu X H 2009 Rare Metal Mat. Eng. 38 365

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai Fuqiang et al 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 11939

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB). (AV) acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PING LI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

WAN, Q., LI, P., WANG, T. et al. NbCl5 and CrCl3 catalysts effect on synthesis and hydrogen storage performance of Mg–Ni–NiO composites. Bull Mater Sci 37, 77–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-014-0631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-014-0631-z

Keywords

Navigation