Advertisement

Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 575–583 | Cite as

Optimization of mechanical properties of non-woven short sisal fibre-reinforced vinyl ester composite using factorial design and GA method

  • S VELUMANIEmail author
  • P NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN
  • S JAYABAL
  • D S ROBINSON SMART
Article

Abstract

This work presents a systematic approach to evaluate and study the effect of process parameters on tensile, flexural and impact strength of untreated short sisal fibre-reinforced vinyl ester polymer-based composites and predicts the optimum properties of random natural fibre-reinforced composites. The natural fibre of sisal at lengths of 10, 30 and 50 mm and vinyl ester resin at loadings of 15, 30 and 45 (wt%) were prepared. The composite panel was then fabricated using hand lay method in cold process of size 180×160 mm2. Samples were then cut from the panel and subjected to mechanical properties testing such as tensile, flexural and impact strengths. The average tensile strength ranges between 27·1 and 43·9 MPa. The flexural strength ranged between 26·9 and 49·5 MPa and the impact strength ranged between 16 and 93 J/m. The strength values were optimized using factorial design and genetic algorithm (GA) method. The predicted optimum process parameter values are in good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

Sisal fibre composites polymer matrix mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of Mr G Tharanidharan and S Gnanakumar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, to carry out mechanical testing.

References

  1. Cruz-Ramos and Carlos A 1986 Mechanical properties of reinforced thermoplastics (Springer) p. 65Google Scholar
  2. Goldberg D E 1989 Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning (Addison-Wesley)Google Scholar
  3. Jayabal S and Natarajan U 2011 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 54 639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jayabal S, Natarajan U and Sekar U 2011 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 55 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Joly C, Gauthier R and Escouben M 1996 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 61 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph P V, Kuruvilla Joseph and Sabu Thomas 1999 Compos. Sci. Technol. 59 1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Noorunnisa Khanam P, Abdul Khalil H P S, Jawaid M, Ramachandra Reddy G, Surya Narayana C and Venkata Naidu S 2010 J. Polym. Environ. 18 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pavithran C, Mukherjee P S, Brahmakumar M and Damodaran A D 1987 J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6 882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rajasekaran S and Vijayalakshmi Pai G A 2005 Neural networks, fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms (New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India) p. 228Google Scholar
  10. Sotton M and Ferrari M 1989 L’industrie Textile 1197 58Google Scholar
  11. Woodhams R T, Thomas G and Rodgers D K 1984 Polym. Eng. Sci. 24 1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yadav Ranjana, Devi Archana, Tripathi Garima and Srivastava Deepak 2007 Euro. Polym. J. 43 3531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang S and Horrocks A R 2003 Prog. Polym. Sci. 28 1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhong J B, Lv J and Wei C 2007 Express Polym. Lett. 10 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S VELUMANI
    • 1
    Email author
  • P NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN
    • 2
  • S JAYABAL
    • 3
  • D S ROBINSON SMART
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVelalar College of Engineering and TechnologyErodeIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKongu Engineering CollegePerunduraiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringA.C. College of Engineering and TechnologyKaraikudiIndia
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKarunya UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations