Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 177–181 | Cite as

Preparation and characterization of a novel bone graft composite containing bone ash and egg shell powder



Egg shells which were hitherto discarded as wastes were collected, purified and powdered into a particle size in the range of 5–50 μm. A composite bone graft material in cylindrical form was prepared using egg shell powder (ESP), bone ash (BA) and gelatin. These bone grafts were characterized for their FT–IR, TGA, XRD, SEM and mechanical properties. The mechanical studies indicate that the composite having a stoichiometric ratio of BA (3 g) and ESP (7 g) has shown better mechanical properties. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data indicated the crystallographic nature of BA is akin to hydroxyapatite (HA) and both BA and ESP did not lose their crystalline nature when bone grafts were prepared. This revealed that ESP may be used as a component in bone graft utilizing the solid waste from the poultry industry.


Egg shell powder; bone ash; bone graft; gelatin; poultry industry; solid waste. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed Samina and Ahsan Mainul 2008 Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 43 501Google Scholar
  2. Balliga M, Davies P and Dupoirieux L 1998 Rev. Stomatol. chir Maxillofac. 99 86Google Scholar
  3. Best S M, Porter A E, Thian E S and Huang J 2008 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28 1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasgupta P, Singh A, Adak S and Purohit K M 2004 International symposium of research students on materials science and engineering, Chennai, 1 Google Scholar
  5. Dupoirieux L 1999 J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 37 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D and Souyris F 1995 J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 23 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dupoirieux L, Neves M and Pourquier D 2000 J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 58 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Neves M and Teot L 2001 J. Craniofac. Surg. 12 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler B O 1974 Inorg. Chem. 13 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory Lee Y, Ajay S, Darryl D’Lima D, Pamela Pulido A and Clifford Colwell W 2005 J. Arthroplasty 20 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liji Sobhana S S, Sundaraseelan J, Sekar S, Sastry T P and Mandal A B 2009 J. Nanopart. Res. 11 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Monma H and Kamiya V 1987 J. Mater. Sci. 22 4247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakano T, Ikawa N I and Ozimek L 2003 Poult. Sci. 82 510Google Scholar
  14. Noorjahan S E and Sastry T P 2005 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B75 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park Jin-Woo, Bae Sang-Ryul, Suh Jo-Young, Lee Dong-Hee, Kim Sang-Hyun, Kim Hyungiun and Lee Chong-Soo 2007 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 87 203Google Scholar
  16. Prabakaran K, Balamurugan A and Rajeshwari S 2005 Bull. Mater. Sci. 28 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rivera E M, Araiza M, Brostow W, Castano V M, Diaz-Estrada J R and Rogelio Rodriguez 1990 J. Mater. Lett. 41 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sasikumar S and Vijayaraghavan R 2006 Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 19 70Google Scholar
  19. Schaafsma A, Pakan I, Hofstede G J H, Muskiet F A J, Van Der Veer E and De Vries P J F 2000 Poultry Sci. 79 1833Google Scholar
  20. Shiny V, Ramesh P, Sunny M C and Varma H K 2000 Mater. Lett. 46 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sundaraseelan J and Sastry T P 2007 J. Biomed. Nanotech. 3 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wafaa I A F, Osiris W G, Shamael S M and Khalil M R 1994 Biomaterials 20 475Google Scholar
  23. Yoshio M, Kazuo M and Sumio S 1990 J. Ceram. Soc. Jap. 98 1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zang S M, Cui F Z, Liao S S, Zhu Y and Han L 2003 J. Mater. Sci. 14 641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations