Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glioblastoma recurrent cells switch between ATM and ATR pathway as an alternative strategy to survive radiation stress

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary treatment modality for glioblastoma (GBM) post-surgery is radiation therapy. Due to increased DNA damage repair capacity of resistant residual GBM cells, recurrence is inevitable in glioblastoma and unfortunately the recurrent tumours are resistant to the conventional therapy. Here we used our previously described in vitro radiation survival model generated from primary GBM patient samples and cell lines, which recapitulates the clinical scenario of therapy resistance and relapse. Using the parent and recurrent GBM cells from these models, we show that similar to parent GBM, the recurrent GBM cells also elicit a competent DNA damage response (DDR) post irradiation. However, the use of apical DNA damage repair sensory kinase (ATM and/or ATR) is different in the recurrent cells compared to parent cells. Consistently, we demonstrate that there is a differential clonogenic response of parent and recurrent GBM cells to the ATM and ATR kinase inhibitors with recurrent samples switching between these sensory kinases for survival emphasizing on the underlying heterogeneity within and across GBM samples. Taken together, here we report that recurrent tumours utilize an alternate DDR kinase to overcome radiation induced DNA damage. Since there is no effective treatment specifically for recurred GBM patients, these findings provide a rationale for developing newer treatment option to sensitize recurrent GBM samples by detecting in clinics the ability of cells to activate a DNA damage repair kinase different from their parent counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2

References

  1. Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell. 2012;47(4):497–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta A, Haber JE. Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(9):a016428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornforth MN. Radiation-induced damage and the formation of chromosomal aberrations. In: Nickoloff JA, Hoekstra MF, editors. DNA damage and repair: volume 2: DNA repair in higher eukaryotes. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1998. p. 559–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1071–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McKinnon PJ. DNA repair deficiency and neurological disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(2):100–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogakou EP, et al. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lukas J, Lukas C, Bartek J. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(10):1161–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burma S, et al. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(45):42462–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stiff T, et al. ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2004;64(7):2390–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ward IM, Chen J. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(51):47759–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell. 2007;28(5):739–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meek K, Dang V, Lees-Miller SP. DNA-PK: the means to justify the ends? Adv Immunol. 2008;99:33–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cimprich KA, Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(8):616–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward IM, et al. Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphorylated histone H2AX. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(22):19579–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Celeste A, et al. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5(7):675–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Paull TT, et al. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2000;10(15):886–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn JY, et al. Threonine 68 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2000;60(21):5934–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith J, et al. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2010;108:73–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bensimon A, Aebersold R, Shiloh Y. Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(11):1625–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis ME. Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20(5 Suppl):S2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Witthayanuwat S, et al. Survival Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(9):2613–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur E, et al. Radiation-induced homotypic cell fusions of innately resistant glioblastoma cells mediate their sustained survival and recurrence. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(6):685–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaur E, et al. Inhibition of SETMAR-H3K36me2-NHEJ repair axis in residual disease cells prevents glioblastoma recurrence. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(12):1785–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaur E, et al. Molecular features unique to glioblastoma radiation resistant residual cells may affect patient outcome - a short report. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2019;42(1):107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaur E, et al. Molecular features unique to glioblastoma radiation resistant residual cells may affect patient outcome - a short report. Cell Oncol. 2019;42(1):107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghorai A, et al. Sustained inhibition of PARP-1 activity delays glioblastoma recurrence by enhancing radiation-induced senescence. Cancer Lett. 2020;490:44–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jucaite A, et al. Brain exposure of the ATM inhibitor AZD1390 in humans-a positron emission tomography study. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(4):687–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yap TA, et al. Abstract PR14: Phase I trial of first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor VX-970 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with carboplatin (CP) in advanced cancer patients (pts) with preliminary evidence of target modulation and antitumor activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-15-PR14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Majd NK, et al. The promise of DNA damage response inhibitors for the treatment of glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology Advances. 2021;3(1):vdabo15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR4020/MED/30/792/2012) to SD. EK is Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Fellow. Immunofluorescence images were captured with the help from ACTREC Digital Imaging facility (ADIF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SD and EK conceptualized and designed the experiments. EK and MK performed the experiments. EK, MK and SD analysed data and prepared the manuscript. SD supervised research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpee Dutt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

GBM tissues were obtained after approval from the Tata Memorial Centre Institutional Ethics Committee (TMC-IEC III) DCGI registration number: IEC III: ECR/149/Inst/MH/2013 and after obtaining a written consent form in the language understood by the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 703 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, E., Ketkar, M. & Dutt, S. Glioblastoma recurrent cells switch between ATM and ATR pathway as an alternative strategy to survive radiation stress. Med Oncol 39, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01657-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01657-4

Keywords

Navigation