Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of axitinib and sunitinib as first-line therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world multicenter analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to compare oncological outcomes and safety of axitinib and sunitinib in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We retrospectively evaluated 169 patients with mRCC who were treated with axitinib or sunitinib as the first-line therapy in five hospitals between October 2008 and August 2018. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between axitinib (n = 68) and sunitinib (n = 101) groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate effects of first-line therapies on progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Patients in the axitinib group were significantly older (66 vs. 72 years) than those in the sunitinib group. Median relative dose intensity was significantly higher in the axitinib group (94 ± 62%) than in the sunitinib group (65 ± 20%; P = 0.001). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the axitinib group (21%) than in the sunitinib group (10%; P = 0.042). IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed significant differences in CSS and OS but not in PFS between the two groups. Safety in terms of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly different between the axitinib (34%) and sunitinib (55%) groups (P = 0.006). Compared with sunitinib, axitinib significantly prolonged CSS and OS and showed a safer profile as the first-line therapy for treatment-naïve mRCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

mRCC:

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

TKIs:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

ECOG PS:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status

IMDC:

International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

PD:

Progressive disease

PFS:

Progression-free survival

CSS:

Cancer-specific survival

OS:

Overall survival

IPTW:

Inverse probability of treatment weighted

HR:

Hazard ratio

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

IQR:

Interquartile range

RDI:

Relative dose intensity

mTORi:

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor

References

  1. Hutson TE, Lesovoy V, Al-Shukri S, Stus VP, Lipatov ON, Bair AH, et al. Axitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1287–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70465-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutson TE, Al-Shukri S, Stus VP, Lipatov ON, Shparyk Y, Bair AH, et al. Axitinib versus sorafenib in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma: overall survival from a randomized phase III trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(1):72–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pal SK, Signorovitch JE, Li N, Zichlin ML, Liu Z, Ghate SR, et al. Patterns of care among patients receiving sequential targeted therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective chart review in the USA. Int J Urol. 2017;24(4):272–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shinohara N, Abe T. Prognostic factors and risk classifications for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2015;22(10):888–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomita Y. Treatment strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a new paradigm for surgical treatment. Int J Urol. 2016;23(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JL, Kim MK, Park I, Ahn JH, Lee DH, Ryoo HM, et al. RandomizEd phase II trial of sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off versus two weeks on and one week off in metastatic clear-cell type REnal cell carcinoma: restore trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(11):2300–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwamoto K, Ishihara H, Takagi T, Kondo T, Yoshida K, Iizuka J, et al. Evaluation of relative dose intensity during the early phase of first-line sunitinib treatment using a 2-week-on/1-week-off regimen for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2018;35(6):78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1139-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawashima A, Uemura M, Kato T, Ujike T, Nagahara A, Fujita K, et al. Results of weekday-on and weekend-off administration schedule of sunitinib therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1332-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouillet G, Paillard MJ, Maurina T, Vernerey D, Nguyen Tan Hon T, Almotlak H, et al. Open-label, randomized multicentre phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib by dose administration regimen (dose modification or dose interruptions) in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: study protocol of the SURF trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2613-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Guida FM, Santoni M, Conti A, Burattini L, Savini A, Zeppola T, et al. Alternative dosing schedules for sunitinib as a treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;92(3):208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondo T, Takagi T, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Nozaki T, Hashimoto Y, et al. Superior tolerability of altered dosing schedule of sunitinib with 2-weeks-on and 1-week-off in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma–comparison to standard dosing schedule of 4-weeks-on and 2-weeks-off. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(3):270–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyt232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, et al. Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9807):1931–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61613-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ambring A, Bjorholt I, Lesen E, Stierner U, Oden A. Treatment with sorafenib and sunitinib in renal cell cancer: a Swedish register-based study. Med Oncol. 2013;30(1):331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0331-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichelberg C, Vervenne WL, De Santis M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goebell PJ, Lerchenmuller C, et al. SWITCH: a randomised, sequential, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib-sunitinib versus sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):837–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oya M, Tomita Y, Fukasawa S, Shinohara N, Habuchi T, Rini BI, et al. Overall survival of first-line axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Japanese subgroup analysis from phase II study. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(6):1231–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Horiguchi H, Yoneyama T, Hatakeyama S, Tokui N, Sato T, Fujita N, et al. Impact of bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy of upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ: comparison of oncological outcomes with radical nephroureterectomy. Med Oncol. 2018;35(4):41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1102-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kido K, Hatakeyama S, Fujita N, Yamamoto H, Tobisawa Y, Yoneyama T, et al. Oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1248-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Momota M, Hatakeyama S, Tokui N, Sato T, Yamamoto H, Tobisawa Y, et al. The impact of preoperative severe renal insufficiency on poor postsurgical oncological prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamano I, Hatakeyama S, Iwamurau H, Fujita N, Fukushi K, Narita T, et al. Preoperative chronic kidney disease predicts poor oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(37):61404–14. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosogoe S, Hatakeyama S, Kusaka A, Hamano I, Iwamura H, Fujita N, et al. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2017:231–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.013.

  21. Kodama H, Hatakeyama S, Fujita N, Iwamura H, Anan G, Fukushi K, et al. Preoperative chronic kidney disease predicts poor oncological outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(47):83183–94. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kubota Y, Hatakeyama S, Tanaka T, Fujita N, Iwamura H, Mikami J, et al. Oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter study. Oncotarget. 2017;8(60):101500–8. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kusaka A, Hatakeyama S, Hosogoe S, Hamano I, Iwamura H, Fujita N, et al. Detecting asymptomatic recurrence after radical cystectomy contributes to better prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Med Oncol. 2017;34(5):90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-0955-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koie T, Ohyama C, Okamoto A, Yamamoto H, Imai A, Hatakeyama S, et al. Presurgical therapy with axitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:484. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Koie T, Ohyama C, Yoneyama T, Yamamoto H, Imai A, Hatakeyama S, et al. Feasibly of axitinib as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience in Japan. BMC Urol. 2015;15:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0027-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheng X, Bi F, Ren X, Cheng Y, Wang J, Rosbrook B, et al. First-line axitinib versus sorafenib in Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: exploratory subgroup analyses of Phase III data. Future Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka Y, Hatakeyama S, Hosogoe S, Tanaka T, Hamano I, Kusaka A, et al. Presurgical axitinib therapy increases fibrotic reactions within tumor thrombus in renal cell carcinoma with thrombus extending to the inferior vena cava. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(1):134–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1169-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosogoe S, Hatakeyama S, Kusaka A, Hamano I, Tanaka Y, Hagiwara K, et al. Contrast media enhancement reduction predicts tumor response to presurgical molecular-targeting therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KH, Kim HY, Kim HR, Sun JM, Lim HY, Lee HJ, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with renal insufficiency. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(4):746–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Choueiri TK, Larkin J, Oya M, Thistlethwaite F, Martignoni M, Nathan P, et al. Preliminary results for avelumab plus axitinib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Renal 100): an open-label, dose-finding and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(4):451–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30107-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Takuma Narita, Teppei Okamoto, Itsuto Hamano, Hirotaka Horiguchi, Masaaki Oikawa, Daisuke Noro, Kazuhisa Hagiwara, Yuki Fujita, Yukie Nishizawa, and Satomi Sakamoto for their invaluable support in data collection. The authors would also like to thank Enago (http://www.enago.jp) for English language review.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Nos. 17K11118, 17K11119, 17K16768, 17K16770, 17K167711, 18K16681, 18K16682, 18K16717, 18K16718, 18K16719, and 18K09157) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shingo Hatakeyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konishi, S., Hatakeyama, S., Tanaka, T. et al. Comparison of axitinib and sunitinib as first-line therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world multicenter analysis. Med Oncol 36, 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1231-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1231-3

Keywords

Navigation