Skip to main content
Log in

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of esophageal cancer patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, toxicity profile, and dosimetric results of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients. A total of 68 patients were treated with VMAT between March 2014 and March 2018 (44% vs 56% for definitive and neoadjuvant settings, respectively). Dose prescription differed depending on the clinical scenario (54–60 Gy in 30 fractions for definitive treatments; 41.4/45 Gy in 23–25 fractions in the pre-operative setting). Most of the patients were given concurrent chemotherapy. Two coplanar and one non-coplanar arcs were employed for VMAT delivery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Acute toxicity was generally mild. In patients treated with definitive intent, ≥ G3 toxicities were observed for esophagitis (30%), anorexia (26.7%), fatigue (26.7%), nausea (6.7%), and vomiting (3.3%). In patients treated within a neoadjuvant approach, ≥ G3 anorexia (21%), esophagitis (15.8%), fatigue (13.3%), nausea (5.3%), and vomiting (2.6%) were observed. Dosimetric results were consistent in term of both target coverage and normal tissue sparing. In conclusion, VMAT proved to be a feasible, safe, and effective strategy to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin-Richard M, Diaz Beveridge R, Arrazubi V, Alsina M, Galan Guzman M, Custodio AB, et al. SEOM clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18:1179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannova R, Arnold D, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v50–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Castro C, Bosetti C, Malvezzi M, et al. Patterns and trends in esophageal cancer mortality and incidence in Europe (1980–2011) and predictions to 2015. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:283–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Oyama T, Kato H, Kitagawa Y, Kusano M, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus. 2015;12:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sohda M, Kurwano H. Current status and future prospects for esophageal cancer treatment. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franco P, Fiorentino A, Dionisi F, et al. Combined modality therapy for thoracic and head and neck cancer: a review of updated literature based on a consensus meeting. Tumori. 2016;102:459–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amini A, Ajani J, Komaki R, Allen PK, Minsky BD. Blum M, et al. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:306–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Munch S, Alchmeier S, Hapfelmeir A, Duma MN, Oechsner M, Felth M, et al. Comparison of dosimetric parameters and toxicity in esophageal cancer patients undergoing 3D conformal radiotherapy or VMAT. Strahlenther Onkol. 2016;192:722–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:967–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, Mistrangelo M, Cassoni P, Munoz F, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer patients. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iorio GC, Franco P, Gallio E, Martini S, Arcadipane F, Bartoncini S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver nodal irradiation in breast cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2018;35:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin L, Wu H, Gong J, Geng JH, Jiang F, Shi AH, et al. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5266–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gong G, Wang R, Guo Y, Zhai D, Liu T, Lu J, et al. Reduced lung dose during radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma: VMAT combined with active breathing control for moderate DIBH. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicolini G, Ghosh-Laskar S, Shristava SK, Banerjee S, Chaudhary S, Agarwal JP, et al. Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy with flattening filter-free beams compared with static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:553–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria. http://www.rtog.org. Accessed August 22 2018.

  16. National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Toxiity Criteria for Adverse Events. Version 4.02. http://ctep.cancer.gov. Accessed August 22 2018.

  17. Franco P, Arcadipane F, Strignano P, et al. Pre-operative treatments for adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a review of the current evidence from randomized trials. Med Oncol. 2017;34:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hulshof MC, van Laarhoven HW. Chemoradiotherapy in tumours of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:551–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simens RJ, Devitt P, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:659–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garg PK, Sharma J, Jakhetiya A, Goel A, Gaur MK. Preoperative therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:8750–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Benthuysen L, Hales L, Podgorsak MB. Volumetric modulated arc therapy vs IMRT for the treatment of distal esophageal cancer. Med Dosim. 2011;36:404–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fenkell L, Kaminsky I, Breen S, Huang S, Van Prooijen M, Ringash J. Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fakhrian K, Oechsner M, Kampfer S, Schuster T, Molls M, Geinitz H. Advanced techniques in neoadjuvant radiotherapy allow dose escalation without increased dose to organs ar risk: planning study in esophageal carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013;189:293–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Roeder F, Nicolay NH, Nguyen T, Saleh-Ebrahimi L, Askoxylakis V, Bostel T, et al. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, Mistrangelo M, Cassoni P, Racca P, et al. Hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients during combined chemo-radiation: a radiation oncologist perspective. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:335–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, Lesca A, Gallio E, Mistragelo M, et al. Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2016;33:72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei X, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Wang S, Mohan R, Cox JD, et al. Risk factors for pericardial effusion in inoperable esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:707–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawkins MA, Bedford JL, Warrington AP, Tait DM. Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:44–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin SH, Zhang N, Godby J, Wang J, Marsh GD, Liao Z, et al. Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:917–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwa SL, Lebesque JV, Theuws JC, Marks LB, Munley MT, Bentel G, et al. Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: an analysis of pooled data of 540 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee HK, Vaporcyan AA, Cox JD, Tucker SL, Putman JB Jr, Ajani JA, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications after preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal carcinoma: correlation with pulmonary dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1317–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fiandra C, Filippi AR, Catuzzo P, Botticella A, Ciammella A, Franco P, et al. Different IMRT solutions vs 3D-conformal radiotherapy in early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: dosimetric comparison and clinical considerations. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierfrancesco Franco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we do not have any conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The present study has been reviewed and approved by the Internal Review Board of the Department of Oncology of the University of Turin at AOU Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martini, S., Arcadipane, F., Strignano, P. et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of esophageal cancer patients. Med Oncol 35, 150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1211-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1211-7

Keywords

Navigation